>>73507
Been thinking about this since you posted it, so apologies for the late reply.
But it made me realize LN/VN discussion places are not exactly dead, but never were properly "born" in the first place as they never really got the proper social contract established like it happened with manga and anime thread.
For example, with anime threads the social code of conduct was talk about the airing episode, or the previous eps, or speculate about future eps, if you read the source material then don't spoil anything.
With manga threads however, everything goes, assume people are caught up to date with the current chapter, talk about things the anime hasn't covered (and may never cover), no point in holding back spoilers.
If anything with the rise of leak culture and people spoiling chapters that are not even up yet came the destruction of the social code of conduct on manga threads which basically made them a complete shitshow, and anime threads already started to suffer from spoilerfags and people shitting out fake spoilers as well.
However with for example LN threads there was no such code of conduct ever made, mostly in part because the stories are fucking long a lot of the time and in the west reading a single book is a massive time investment, let alone 15-20 for the average LN, let alone 50+ for stuff like to aru.
How should people act? Do you only talk about surface level stuff which will bore people caught up with the material? Do you talk about spoilers knowing you will ruin it for people only halfway into the novel and reduce the amount of people in the thread? What about the difference in "current' when it comes to the JP material and the okamalations? What about the fact translations since the early 10s have been effectively abridged parodies and completely different stories, making people reading the EN and JP versions talk about completely different characters?
There's simply no social contract at all, there was one in sites like BT, but surprise surprise, kikes aimed to kill those first.