>>55710 She lives in Seattle and I've met her a couple times. Really chill person, and she's super cute too. I changed her diaper at an ABDL event.

>>55732 Know what? I never thought of it that way. I've just been taking out all of my anger against innocent people. Listening to you really puts it all into perspective. Like what am I really doing with my life? Until today I have been acting like immature. Realizing this I am honestly ashamed of myself. Starting today I am turning over a new leaf. Everyone deserves to be treated with respect no matter who they are. Love always wins in the end, and I will work to do better. Finally, thanks anon for putting this all into perspective and helping me be a better person.

>>55731 >>55732 >>55734 >>55735 BO just cleaned up this mess, samefag. You can spam this thread up to the bump limit again, but you still fail to realize that YOU are the cringe. >Plus, a ton of content in cringe threads gets posted without the person’s permission. If they posted something to their public social media, permission is a moot point. >Everyone deserves to be treated with respect no matter who they are. Yeah, sure, I'll definitely treat Pamperchu and Deeker with respect. Have we made mistakes in this thread? Sure. Does that mean we should love and accept all the nonces and bad actors in our community? Fuck no. This thread's for laughing at diapered douchebags. You can either continue being the clown, or just fuck off.

>>55732 >>55734 >>55735 >All in all, cringe threads kinda normalize being mean for sport Yes, that is the goal. Schadenfreude is another way of using the word. It is acceptable to shame those who fuck things up for others. Their actions aren't harmless, the bill comes due. schadenfreude /shäd′n-froi″də/ noun 1. Pleasure derived from the misfortunes of others. 2. Malicious enjoyment derived from observing someone else's misfortune. 3. Delight in another person's misfortune. If I rolled my car over and walked around the scene in a babydoll and a diaper, it would not be a surprise for that to be posted online. It would suck, but I would at least know I earned the scorn. Better to not play dressup like that out in public (can always change in a bathroom or spare room before going in to an event - for instance an abdl party). Our community is tarnished with a handful of people doing shit that doesn't represent the majority. Those few deserve the scorn. Your little schizo self-congratulatory jerk-off of messages doesn't fool anyone. Save the sermons for someone who gives a fuck. "To feel envy is human, to savor schadenfreude is diabolic." ---- Schopenhauer

Didn't want to respond to all of this, but might as well. The main thing is that, regardless of the legality of sharing publicly available information, the obsessive focus on finding twisted humor in the shameful activities of another is not "normal" or "healthy" behavior. If you mentioned one of the people covered in this thread to someone on the street, they'd probably laugh along at first, but then they'd grow visibly uncomfortable with the way you want to continue to dwell on things. In the area where I live, embarrassing behavior in a public place is the kind of thing you ignore and shun. The instinct isn't continually immerse yourself in it but to get back to normal life as quickly as possible. At the end of the day it's the moral grandstanding in the cringe threads (e.g., they perform a healthy social function of encouraging better behavior from undesireables, "Self-policing the community," etc.) that is ridiculous. You do have the right to participate in cringe threads and to laugh at people, but you should be honest about the fact that it is for your own gratification. Man is free to act, even when it is immoral. It's mostly the self-righteousness about it that pisses me off nowadays; the activity itself is wrong, yeah, but again people have free will. At the end of the day the whole lolcow phenomenon just isn't something that "normal" people whom people are allegedly representing get caught up with. The average family man who would fully agree with you on the cringe-worthiness and shame of the people involved would still not be comfortable in a thread based entirely on it.

>>55735 >>55736 >>55739 Can people not into sarcasm, or remember to read the first letter of the sentences anymore? Anyway, yeah that whole thing with that faggot https://x.com/TheDLTrooper that turned over his vehicle while high in the sissy abdl getup was pretty fucked up. Too bad he never learned his lesson and is still showing off his diapers in public for a humiliation kick while dressed like a faggot.

>>55754 No instead you spend your entire day patrolling this one thread. But I dont know why you are trying to defend that guy, since his views would be the kind you hate and make fun of

>>55757 >>55758 Here is some cringe you can appreciate.

>>55761 This is the cringe thread, the politics thread is: >>>25836 Staying on topic this cringe from when that guy got arrested for wearing a onesie and diapers at a children's playground.

>>55765 Damn, defending a pedophile exposing himself to children while claiming they are against pedophiles. How classically hypocritical.

>>55757 Doxxing is okay with this tranny because he almost committed a felony while driving under DUI, this nigger deserves to be put away

>>55622 Jesus fucking Christ, this fucking faggot really do not have any self aware. How he didn't get arrested was beyond fuck up

>>55710 All of this because of jealousy over a handicapped sister, even fucking wearing a diaper in a fucking public space. This tranny is a fucking dead end and this is a reason why diaper fetish community always getting look down upon. These niggers deserve no ounce of respect or sympathy and should be locked away behind a mental asylum

Can we please stop obessing with the white hosue and go back to actual abdl cringe like tygre or something silly Unless you wanna make a thread focusing on diapered presidents or diapered horse vs elephant No one cares ok

>>55791 Kiwifarms? The fuck you on about kiwifarms I'm just staying there already places for politics in 4chan area Or just go to mlpol if your that obsessed

>>55790 Same, but we have obsessed spammer fag pissed off there is a cringe thread while the BO only does anything about it after it's been going on for weeks with repeat complaints and reports to do something. As has been repeatedly pointed out this thread wouldn't have much activity at all if not for polititard spammer/sage anon. No concept at all of the Streisand effect apparently with that one. If spammer fag actually cares as he claims he'd ignore the thread and do something more productive. Polititard spammer/sage anon is just a petty moronic keyboard warrior with a personal vendetta against this board and previous BO specifically which is made worse by the current BO ignoring spam and reports for weeks at a time. Just looking at the logs most of the work is done by GMs and BO only bothers cleaning the board when people directly call him out on it. Not the first or even second time this has happened

>cringe threads are dead keeps it alive by spamming it ironically' merely pretending to be retarded the cringe is coming from inside the house

Can we just talk about diapers?

>>55831 I mean, yeah, this is rather annoying about our culture. TBH 16 seems like a more reasonable age for consent. Plenty of countries do have it at 16. I still find it weird someone can be old enough to join the army, drive a car, or consent to sex, but not be old enough to drink or smoke. A lot of the world's laws on specific age are kinda arbitrary and culture surrounding is irrational and emotional. It's concerning it is possible a couple underage teenagers can be arrested for having sex with each other in some places. It's bizarre people freak out over finding a 16-17 year old attractive when that is the age of consent in various Asian and European countries. I don't even think we should be forcing teenagers to stay in highschool until 18. Historically apprenticeships and higher education started younger than that. Plus there's a real issue in some professions of how many years of training is required. Also annoying the double standard of this for sex. People freak out way more if a man is the older one, but people don't care and are more willing to ignore it if it's a woman as the older. Doesn't help at all the media industry sexualizes teenagers all the time (not even getting into how many child and teenage actors end up with issues because of being raised within the entertainment industry), both fictional and real, but people act like you're a perverted monster if you point this out. TLDR; I agree a lot of our laws surrounding age of consent are inconsistent, illogical, and arbitrary. Side note, I also suspect a lot of our modern definitions and ideas of childhood have contributed to ABDL's prevalence and so.e psychological problems we have now. Again, historically, children tended to be viewed more as miniature adults and there wasn't really a concept of shielding kids from the realities of how fucked up the world can be. I really think the safetyism and "think of the children" logic has messed up a lot of people by the time they reach adulthood.

>>55833 Young people are completely screwed in today's world and allowing them to "consent" to sex earlier isn't going to help in any way.

>>55834 >>55836 >>55837 He's not entirely wrong though. Various European and East Asian countries do have it at 16 without it causing major issues. I do find it funny moralfag midwits will screech about finding someone who's a month from 18 attractive and act like it's a sex crime. It's why I roll my eyes every time fan art or fan works have a disclaimer of "All the characters are totally at least 18. Trust me. It would be the worst thing ever to be called a pervert online over fictional characters." even if it's clear within the story they aren't. Also I agree with that last point that our modern conceptions of youth and childhood and how society has gotten increasingly infantilized is a contributor to ABLD fetish getting more common and creating psychological issues. I can't be the only here who had the experience of parents who oversheltered them and didn't really adequately prepare them for the real world at all followed by some form of "Figure it out on your own. Not our fault we did a poor job prepping you for this." when turning 18.

>>55839 Here in uk the rules aren't even clear on certain details Like there no age gap rule (so legally 16 can date a 30 year old) but there no rule about 15 dating a 16 And about getting teens into abdl is same problem people have with queer stuff and don't mean about being gay but talking about wanting to transition and discuss maybe changing your gender without actually having a conversation And is worst when kids are on say vrchat and there q chance they might see something that they shouldn't Like i was in a public lobby and heard a child and everyone else confirm they were adult and this child was 6 So i chat with him saying he shouldn't be on vrchat until he actually older at least 13 and i asked if he promised to wait and go on other places that are kid appropriate like rec room as rec room is aimed towards kids Also here something i find creepy So i have different kinds of fetishes and of course i have private YouTube playlists that collect fetish content For 8 years my playlist been flagged as "child endangerment" and i lose my playlist And yet you search abdl there are 2 playlists that are old and still up which yes had abdl but also literal children in diapers Which despite my flagging YouTube apparently don't see as child endangerment and these are public playlists Wanna know what i have? Inflation,fat and diaper videos not one irl child featured YouTube thinks me having a collection of Inflation cartoon videos is bad yet a diaper playlist which has multiple irl children in the playlist isn't creepy? And on that note who keep uploading family baby videos as they should be kept to yourself especially when your doing stuff like changing a diaper as Sorry that's something pedobears want to see and jerk off to Is like adults don't wanna keep children safe and legit discuss the topic properly instead just go "I'm angry and want change" "Ok what change?" "Um...i just want change" while there kid browsing the internet learning to make DIY hormoan blockers cause keffles was showing them femboy lolis and saying "you know this is what you can be in my harem"

So spammer fag apparently is one of those idiots that thinks you can rape an underage but completely fictional character and is the sort to consider sex even one day before eighteen as evil. He repeatedly confirms his points are regurgitation of what he's been told with no criticism or thinking behind his political spergery. He'd just be part of previous nonsensical moral panics if born earlier.

>>55855 >>55839 Can't believe I'm agreeing with spammerfag on something. Just because the underage character is fictional doesn't make me any less uncomfortable to see them drawn in sexual situations. Seeing them diapered is one thing, but "what are we gonna do on the bed, onii-chan?" is another.

>>55855 Nice post number. >>55860 Spammerfag's text responses are half chatbot generated. You're agreeing with what the soviets called a "useful idiot" who is using a corpo made chatbot essentially to spam. You may as well be saying "I support current thing." The post above you is very obviously LLM generated. Also 8chan does not give a shit about moralfagging over loli and shota. We have loli, shota, and age regression threads on this board. There are multiple entire boards here for loli and shota. /delicious/, /loli/, and /sm/ are top boards on the front page for fucks sake. If you're gonna bitch about purely fictional porn this is very obviously not the place for it.

>>55862 >We have loli, shota, and age regression threads on this board I am aware, but for the most part our threads aren't always sexual in the traditional sense. As I said before, seeing them diapered and babied is cute, but I'm uncomfortable when it gets explicitly sexual. I'm not gonna say it should be illegal or anything, I'm just saying it's not my preference.

>>55889 >go on thanksgiving break >come back to no more spammerfag Well I guess that is that, anyway back to the regularly scheduled cringe.

>>56285 what even is happening there?

>>56292 sous vide is a method of cooking using vacuum sealed food and boiling water someone is using it to heat a diaper

Reminder that the polititard spammer/Sage has admitted to be willing to break GR2 over his petty vendetta with this board. He's hypocritical trash. Not worth bothering to reply directly too.

>>56285 I imagine this is what a rich white collar cocaine fiend version of pamperchu would be doing.

>>56352 with context I think it's satirical

>>56352 >I imagine this is what a rich white collar cocaine fiend version of pamperchu would be doing. I cook sous vide a lot! Like several times a week... This legit grosses me out and I'm a cop - I've seen some pretty nasty shit. Fuck my eyes! "I think it's satirical", says >>56355 - I don't, but only because it is an Abena adult diaper. If it were a baby diaper, or a clinical adult diaper brand, maybe, but a used Abena diaper? IMHO, this the higher class of trash version of Pamperchu's microwave, lol.

>>56363 With the caption "Microwaves are so 2009", I definitely think it's more satirical than actually serious. I mean that's just directly referencing pamperchu

>>56327 It looks like Sagenonce recently followed through with that. Best to ignore and report any of his posts. It stopped being funny to provoke responses. He's a disgusting bastard that's likely to get shanked in prison for what's on his computer.

>>56398 I'm inclined to agree that this is a dig at Pamperchu, but I wouldn't be surprised if some of the used diaper people actually have a setup like this just because it doesn't involve melting/irradiating plastic.