>>319 Those deleted by fagmods will always be in the minority. There's still tons of engagement in spite of the meddling.

>>310 For such a short paragraph, you got nine different things completely ass backwards. I'm actually impressed.

>>318 >>320 Go fucking kill yourself mark, stop trying to gayop your own goddamn anons you miserable piece of shit.

>>322 >>322 lol

#Trolled

>>323 Oh its head gayopping. Yeah you know what? Maybe having head make the new /v/ was the most retarded fucking idea ever, if I wasnt so desperate I would have said something. Fucking to hell with it. Just let it all die.

>>325 >Being pessimistic is a gayop I guess I was niggerpill all along.

>>327 Ironic shitposting is still shitposting.

>>328 >Ironic You mean facetious, and it isn't, because I'm genuinely pessimistic. Also, shitposting is cool, yo.

>>329 Your concerns are genuine? Well shit. I just come here to joke around man, but. Well if you are indeed serious. Reply and say exactly that, and you will get an actual response to those concerns. Its april first so I can bend a few rules.

>>330 I do not observe April Fool's day, because I am always a fool. But yes, I think imageboards are probably doomed, but this one is probably the most deplatforming proof, so this is my favored site.

>>331 Check ur trash

>>332 i dunno, i think having a public slapfight might help to shame the fat fuck into realizing what a retard hes being, especially since he has the habit of trying to bury his shame over and over again like nobody will remember it

>>333 >Check ur trash No need, everyone can see deleted posts if they have a thread open before a post is deleted. And I don't see a need for you to delete your post either. This board is half /b/, it doesn't need to be very neat and tidy with certain topics kept hidden away for fear of derails or what have you. If you really want a private conversation for whatever reason, I don't think this is the place for it. >>332 >Codexx and Acid are both Root Ah shit, I always thought just one of them was Root and I just couldn't remember which. I rarely see Codexx capcode though. >Codexx forgot his capcode was on and was just trying to anonymously bitch at mark, he deleted his post cuz his capcode was in fact on. Okay, that's good. My fears of Mark's "everything is gayops" fever infecting the administration are quelled. >Now ask another question Do I have to? If I have to state some other more minor concerns, it would be a bit about transparency. This site is far more transparent than most when it comes to how moderation works, but I think a few tweaks may be necessary, like adding post restorations to the public logs, and I think something needs to be done about the potential shady that shit could be conducted with post editing since absolutely no one can see what was in an edited post as far as I know. Huge potential for sneaky shit, but I do take advantage of it to censor pedo links from deleted posts, so I guess it's a double edged sword? On the non-technical side, I think I've already stated on /site/ what I think of how Acid has handled the new Esther situation. Found it, >>>/site/10107 I really was not expecting any admins to visit this board for any reason, let alone be concerned about me doomposting to an audience of maybe three anons at best.

>>335 Oh, there's something I didn't know about editing posts. Post links retro-actively edited into a post do not generate the reverse link on the referenced post.

>>334 There is something to be said for that for sure. And yeah, a good point. >>335 Well we are never on irc at the same time so here is where it will have to be. Globals are forbidden to namefag or capcode, a policy I am obviously trying to change. Transparency is important. Tbh I think the policy was just to stop kaz sperging and embarrassing everyone, but hes years gone now As for your suggestions, they are excellent, I'll raise them tonight with the guys. Id love restorations to be in the logs, along with a patch or two to prevent unlogged deletions a mod trick kaz taught me, we never found a practical use for it though and forgot about it til recently when codexx asked how was mark fucking with anons and not being logged doing it, fucking jackass that he is, anyway thats already being patched Post editing has yeah, recently shown itself to have some bad uses >>336 Including this one I didn't even know about, yeah ima look into this. >I really was not expecting any admins to visit this board for any reason, let alone be concerned about me doomposting to an audience of maybe three anons at best Yeah but I'm one of the anons, you have no idea how intensely frustrating it is to watch an entire website but not be allowed to actually post with anons because marks a giant cock sucking bastard, who has prolly banned me more than any other anon. So I do appreciate someone giving me a place to interact with the anons I watch out for all day. I don't mind working so you guys have somewhere you can be free, to talk about what the fuck ever, but to do the work and know its pointless.... Well its goddamned demoralizing tbh. So I appreciate you having a board for vidya where I won't get banned just for saying breath of fire 5 is dogshit, and as my earlier post said, zzz blocks me fallout from kaz. He's still angry at me, a shame. I really do think of him as a friend and still miss him so. Where else would I be? I think even Acid would like somewhere to talk about vidya without the kike causing problems So. This is enough stuff to maybe get me in trouble, but idk. I wanna talk too sometimes, and transparency is important. Anyways your boards safe, and you have an advocate, personally, on your side. Just do me a favor and lemme know if /b/ is ever in trouble, I really don't know what I'm doing there I gotta get back to the site now, busy day.

>>337 >Just do me a favor and lemme know if /b/ is ever in trouble, I really don't know what I'm doing there I hardly every look at look at it.

>>338 In fact, I can't recall why I ever took over /b/ in the first place. To shit on LCP and ban niggery? Yeah, that sounds probable.

>>338 Okay then join the board ring. The ring of non aligned boards has only one requirement for entry, and thats adding the other boards to your banner message. [Weapons](/k)|[Queen Grace's Royal Palace](/monarchy)|[Politically Incorrect](/polk)|[Video Games](/abdl)|[Books](/lit)|[Role Playing Games](/tg)|[comfy posting](/comfy) Thats /b/s code I worked out with Chai back in 2020, actually looking at now reminds me I need to update it to active boards, anyways, for obvious reasons you can add your own boards you think are similar in temperament to create cross flow.

>>340 >[Video Games](/abdl)

>>340 >Okay then join the board ring. k done >[Weapons](/k)|[Queen Grace's Royal Palace](/monarchy)|[Politically Incorrect](/polk)|[Video Games](/abdl)|[Books](/lit)|[Role Playing Games](/tg)|[comfy posting](/comfy) Oh, so that's how that works and is formatted.

Was the Nintendo Switch 2 thread really just locked because there was too much criticism of Nintendo?

>>347 Most of the "criticism" was unironically niggerpill IP hopping. That being said, we do have our own thread: >>>/bv/344 (73)

>>349 Yeah it definitely was, but there is legitimate criticism too, I wonder why the niggerpill posts weren’t just deleted? And thanks, I’ll check out the thread.

>>350 And most people can tell the difference between the two. I think Mark does too, but just pretends not to so he can lump all the posts he dislikes with niggerpill and delete them.

>>356 He definitely does, its just a convenient excuse to lump them together.

>>358 and maintain plausible deniability*

A surprise to no one, but Mark's on his dickthrone yet again. He's deleting Switch 2 posts left and right and banning people for "spam". He also had deleted the entire ongoing Gamergate thread with around 62 posts (if I remember correctly) because "GCfag was shitting it up". The "Fuck off, GCfag" replies from him haven't stopped either.

>>375 >He also had deleted the entire ongoing Gamergate thread with around 62 posts (if I remember correctly) because "GCfag was shitting it up". What the hell're you on about? The current GG thread has been up for nearly 24 hours and it has around a hundred posts.

>>378 Checked the logs too, just in case it was deleted then hastily restored. Nothing. You're spouting straight bullshit.

>>378 There was one before that. The newest one is the frozen peas edition. If you notice there are no images in the OP aside of the peas one. And if I remember correctly there was a post (at around the start of the thread) that complained about it. Mark quickly made up something about GCfag and deleted the posts related to it after some time, including his own. If it wasn't, then yeah, I cede that my memory's bad.

>>380 >There was one before that. The newest one is the frozen peas edition. If that's the thread you're talking about, I can attest to that thread being made. However I cannot confirm that drama regarding it because I didn't click on either thread, especially since Mork&Cindy are just accusing anyone and everyone of being "GCfag" for almost any reason.

>>380 >>381 I never saw the thread. I recall the GG thread was locked early and the new and current thread was then made. Don't whole threads with lost of posts show up more conspicuously in logs as "Deleted thread with so and so posts"? Or am I just remembering wrong. There's also not a large gap between the last posts of the old thread and the creation of the current one, which makes me doubt this in-between thread could have reached 60+ posts. There's deleted posts in the meta thread around the same time complaining about the locked thread, too.

>>382 >Don't whole threads with lost of posts show up more conspicuously in logs as "Deleted thread with so and so posts"? The delete thread only had like 10 or so posts from what I saw. Like I said, I didn't participate in it so I don't know the exact details. All I can confirm from watching the overboard is that Mark locked the previous GG thread, someone made a new one about the Trump tariffs and the Switch game prices, then the frozen peas thread was created and the tariff thread deleted.

>>383 Sounds about right. I just doubt everything I don't personally witness.