/bv/ - /v/ but with /b/ideogames

Mark doesn't own this one

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
+
-
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0 (Temporarily Dead).

Ghost Screen
Celebrating its fifth anniversary all September


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.


Vidya films and TV shows Anonymous 05/24/2025 (Sat) 21:55:24 Id: 835185 No. 611
Very simple question: What do people actually want out of film and TV adaptations of video games? This concept has been tossed around for the past going on almost 40 years, and it seems like no one can really answer what makes something a "good adaptation". The "closest" I've seen is Anons parading around Postal as being the "best" film adaptation of a game ever made, but that movie was terrible. Mortal Kombat is another "good" one, but it changes significant aspects of the game's plot. Some of the one's I've liked, there was Angelina's Tomb Raider, Anderson's RE series, Prince of Persia, Double Dragon, Need for Speed, and The King Of Fighters. What are other Anon's takes on the "good" adaptations that have come out? Or what makes a "good" adaptation?
(238.04 KB 878x1533 dilberte.png)

>>611 >What do people actually want out of film and TV adaptations of video games? "People", want and will eat garbage if it has the name of something they like on it. I don't really want these adaptations in the first place. It's like making a book to adapt a movie. You're going backwards in terms of mediums, taking away interactivity that's core to the experience that the story was originally made for. If I had to decide on something that's "acceptable", for an adaptation, it would be just simply a non-canon story set in the same world where characters are strongly grounded in their source material. It's been a long time since I've seen it, but I think the Devil May Cry anime series of one-shot stories did this decently enough. If you're talking about live action though, that is a sin, and anyone who wants live action adaptations should burn in the pits of Hell.
I want them to not exist, personally, as there's no such thing as a good live adaption, especially not of something as usually fantastic as video games. Maybe make an animated adaption and don't fill it with arbitrary popular voice actors and it won't make me vomit in disgust. I think normalfags just want catchphrases and good graphics, though.
>>622 >Vid Decided to look up people's reactions, and it seems like the only people even doing stupid shit like this are the literal and unironic oversized and above-age children trying to make themselves look cool on Titkok.
>but it changes significant aspects of the game's plot This is always going to happen, you can't fit a good plot into an hour and a half movie. That being said it was still about a tournament to protect earth from outworld, it was high energy and used relatively unknown actors for the roles (which video game movies should ALWAYS do). Mortal Kombat (the first one) will always be the best because the 'plot' of the game (and the characters) is so simplistic making it almost impossible to fuck up. You go in expecting cool fights and fun one liners and that's exactly what you get. Anything more complicated than 'earthlings fight warriors from other realms to keep earth from falling under their control' will ALWAYS get fucked up. Sure we might get the occasional fun movie like Resident Evil: Apocalypse that gave us Jill and S.T.A.R.S but generally if you like that movie (I do) it's because you didn't really care for RE games and don't care about the non-game add in stuff like Alice.


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply