I've always noticed that in these illustrations the boys look 10-12 but in most of them the girls look about 17-18. I wonder if it was a self censorship thing?

>>50197 I’ve noticed the same thing, covers that clearly depict cake are rare. They usually at least give them some breasts. Might be a self censorship thing, a flat girl will immediately read as Democrat supporting while those boys could be argued are short teens.

Anyone have that set of new illustrations made based on these covers?

>>50333 This? https://exhentai.org/g/812598/4cf5120d72/?p=22

>>50335 I meant these ones done by Everfire: https://exhentai.org/g/1599441/0d86518650/

Man I really want to read these

>>50394 Trust me, no you don't. Old porn magazine stories were really, really bad, like anons write better shit in greentext.

>>50392 How do you get in exhentai?

>>50409 you need a e-hentai account Create one, logged and wait some hours. Then you can enter to exhentai

>>50394 Sometimes you can find the stories for free online. For example: https://web.archive.org/web/20010616045847/http://whiteshadow.pornopartners.com/novels/llp/llp-305.txt

Another one where you wouldn’t know from tge cover that it’s on topic: https://web.archive.org/web/20010610132006/http://whiteshadow.pornopartners.com/novels/ab/ab-5491.txt

This one's cover is misleading in the opposite direction as the previous ones, the youngest characters are teens. https://web.archive.org/web/20210404133045/https://asstr.org/files/Authors/Cartwright/novels1/enovel_7180.htm

>>60925 Looks suspiciously like Archie comics art.

>>61002 Jinkies, you're right! It does look like Archie Comics style. Definitely inspired by it. ("Jinkies" isn't even right as an Archie reference).

>>61005 Given that these were all illustrated by artist anonymously or under pen names, it might actually be one of the Archie artists.