>>37861 >even the most minor of tweaks can change a lot about a character I wish more people understood that. Also damn, I haven't visited that account in so many years, I'm happy it's still going, though it seems they aren't as active anymore.

Side mouth looks bad when the camera's in front of Sonic. Center Mouth looks bad when the camera is to the side of Sonic. >>37862 >Sonic >Shadow >Knuckles >Tails Is this the new core 4?

>>37862 >I wish more people understood that. People have the problem of auto assuming people who talk about this are goign full richard kuta, or chris chan blue arms incident, ignoring the context around the discussion. You can talk about these things without being unhinged.

With the new marketing campaign announcement, do you think we'll get an actual update on Crossworlds in the near future?

>>37865 I think all the hype's been killed after the flat Rouge reveal. Now everyone's just wondering how flat her model in Crossworlds & Frontiers 2 will be.

>>37867 krack...

>>37863 >Tails no

>>37870 Core Four.

>>37865 Probably >>37867 The Rouge thing sucks but that's a bit of an exaggeration I think

>>37864 Yes, but between that and the fact that the companies have gotten away with redesigning character in retarded ways for years it's just too easy to ignore arguments. >>37865 It would make sense. Also they are releasing it this year, and we're already almost half way through. >>37867 >flat Rouge reveal Did they shrink down her boobs again? >>37870 I just realized GHZ is in the background, lol. Also I want to go to the Chao park.

>>37877 >Did they shrink down her boobs again? Yes, and even worse than before

>>37877 Is that Green Hill from Prime? Also what is Chao Park?

>>37879 >Also what is Chao Park? A stage from Crossworlds I guess judging from the trailer.

They finally uploaded Chao Tales in a decent resolution. https://youtu.be/EENSzPFeVFQ?si=WJrL3Mr4eXY5QWUK

>>37881 Maybe it would have been slightly more exciting if they just uploaded this video once and that was it. Anyway I haven't seen the last two episodes yet, guess I'll watch them now

>>37882 (Me) Oh wait it was one episode, not two. I wasn't expecting an Eggman fight, that was kinda cool actually. Not super interesting but I liked it and the transformation "plot twist" (if you can call it that). Nothing to discuss though

How does something that has no dialogue have dialogue editors?

>>37873 Cool as always. I like Elise

>>37884 https://youtu.be/8P_AnvUIvJs?t=7

>>37886 Heh

>>37881 A short Shadow/Sonic chao adventure would be fun. At the very least I want some more Shadow chao stuff. I never realized but the Shadow chao has been featured much more predominantly than other character chao, I don't even remember when was the last time they showed a Sonic chao. >>37882 Probably, but I think Youtube is promoting Youtube shorts trash heavily so it may have been more convenient for them to do that to get better positioned and get more views, and everyone knows views and (You)s are all that matters.

>>37888 Fair point. It's a worse experience for us but publishing it as shorts probably made it do better with little children/babies, which are probably the target audience for these anyways

>>37889 >children/babies, which are probably the target audience for these anyways Do you think Sega should take measures to target adults more /sthg/? I know I've spent a ton of money on sonic crap.

>>37890 I think they already are, but it mainly takes the form of cheap nostalgiapandering to keep our attention. It's kinda sad

>>37890 They are, it's selling toys which appeals to adults who have grown up with Sonic and now have relationships and children of their own.

>>37890 Targeting middle ageds to early teens is the best choice in the long run and it benefits every age group. A little bit of dejewsan go a long way in getting everyone invested in an IP

>>37893 >dejewsan depth? Why is that filtered?

>>37894 What's the filtered word

>>37895 it was depth and can together dejewsan?

>>37896 I see, idk why it would be filtered

It blocks pee tee aich see when put together which is an alternate acronym for CSAM.

no new thread?

>>37900 You can create one.

>>37901 Aight, I'll start baking

>>37903 new