I will use this place to admit that I have no idea what I'm doing. Brain too smooth.

>>198495 You'n'me both, bruv.

I think things are going ok.

The only solution to the Israel-Palestine conflict is a 0 state solution.

>>198495 Well you've been doing a great job ayway.

>>198805 Based

>>198805 Glass the area, give it back to God.

"Gender Euphoria" is just AGPs projecting their paraphilia onto everyone else.

Let it be remembered that it took two days after this containment thread was made for board staff to nevertheless participate in a long discussion "pertain(ing) to the running of the board" in the general thread. >>200307 If you as a janny don't know whether or not something is breaking the rules, maybe you should follow the example set by the board owner, who has himself >>70730 posted porn jumps with pornographic pictures inside on the general thread.

>>200378 To be fair, that post was from 5 months ago and he's been using the horny thread more recently. Still, I'm not sure what his opinion on porn jumps in the general thread is so I wasn't really sure what to do.

>>200385 Not him (as you can probably tell), but if the horny thread is being used more than you got what you asked for, so don’t change anything.

>>200385 I'm with >>200392 why fix what isn't broken?

All the people arguing for hornyposting in the main thread are being really mean about it. So I think we should ignore them on principle.

>>200394 It is mostly DD, tbh.

>>200385 The normal course of events for a poster on a board is that if the board owner does something, even if it was several months ago, you can probably feel safe that making the exact same kind of post he did is allowable. This is because you ought to feel secure that there have not been giant rules changes to boards save when those changes have been prominently announced. This is the case even when the board owner has been posting similar content in a different thread. >I'm not sure what his opinion on porn jumps in the general thread is so I wasn't really sure what to do. If you aren't sure whether a post breaks the rules, the option to not do anything always remains. You are not a slave to whoever decides to spam the report button. Deciding that you have to do something just because someone is complaining leads to selective enforcement of rules only against those who have made enemies who are looking for excuses to report, leading to mob rule. If you later have a discussion with the rest of the moderation team and decide that such a post does break the rules, you can always go back and deal with it then. (And presumably make an announcement as to the ruling, because if you as a member of staff weren't sure whether the post was allowable, surely regular posters are going to be even more confused.)

>>200394 What about me? >>197596

>>200394 If you ignore people on principle of them coming across as mean to you, then you're encouraging them to act up further, because you're also not willing to ban them and they will go to further lengths in order to get your attention or get under your skin. Even if you can ignore them and you don't care about whether other people are affected by their antics, the same isn't necessarily true for others, which is why these arguments start to become more frequent. The decision that has to be made here is to what extent the moderation team wants to enforce the rules. If you guys do not want to enforce the rules as much as possible, then anticipate people to get more nasty over time. Sadly that's just how anonymous message boards go as the community gets larger.

>>200385 Anyway, I think we are fine right now. Mild erotica or nsfw, one-off posts are whatever, everything else goes to horny - that's the vibe I have been getting and most ok with. Yes that is not great for people who want a hard, defined ruleset or just want to dump 4+ furry porn images repeatedly within an hour, but dem the breaks.

>>200399 It's not like we have limited board space, why can't the people who want to spam post pictures make their own thread for that, aside from laziness?

>>200043 All transgenderism is this.

>>200385 I dont care if jumps are in horny thread, I dont mind horny posts in main even so long as its done in moderation, post a lewd pic under a spoiler with something on topic? That seems fine to me. Spamming as many lewd pics as you can apropos of nothing should be in the lewd thread. At the very least keep pics spoilered

>>200398 I was making a joke dude.

>>200404 No offence but your post does not come across as a joke at all. Humor doesn't translate well over the internet, especially not here.

>>200400 We actually do have an art dump thread >>888

>>200405 I thought the inherent silliness of what I was saying was evidence enough. Then again, people can say some pretty silly stuff in complete seriousness, so I guess that's on me for assuming.

>>200395 I HAVEN'T ARGUED IN FAVOR OF SHIT EVEN ONCE. I just don't give a fuck what the rules are because I'm going to do whatever I want regardless. IF ANYTHING, I've gotten my posts unfairly removed while others have done objectively worse

>>200385 I'm personally of the opinion that if we have a Horny Thread, the horny jumps should go there? To me that just seems logical. Especially given the recent pushback about posting substance-less NSFW pics, what would be MORE appropriate to post there other than NSFW jumps and related topics? That said, there are also levels to things. In this case in particular, the jump in question was absolutely full of pornographic imagery, including the front page itself. You can't really 'spoiler' a jump in the same way as an image and just saying that it is a NSFW jump isn't going to prepare you for immediate nude pics when you open it. Especially as many jumps lack images of any kind. I think that even if you make the argument that more tame NSFW jumps can get posted in main provided the convo doesn't devolve, I do think that particular jump was by far horny enough to warrant the horny thread specifically.

>>200406 Only reason why I brought up a separate one was because that one has laid stagnant for quite some time. Maybe it's because people just don't care to use it, or maybe it's because people think it's only for SFW stuff. Might be worth considering telling people who want to spam post porn to post it over there and see how things go. Honestly? I would assume that the porn spam is only coming from a small group of individuals, and that those individuals would be open to posting it in another thread. But of course, a community of anonymous can also be a community of contrarians, so who knows. >>200410 If I were to make a lewd jump and post it up, then by default I would assume to post it in the NFSW section. I've been in the jumpchain community long enough to know that a large portion of the main thread is horny beyond imagination, but even then there is a matter of fetish issues, and just being considerate I think that posting it in the NSFW section makes more sense. So that's my two cents on it, even though I don't plan on making a lewd jump anytime soon.

The main argument I've been hearing in support of less restrictions on hornyposting is that the mods don't have a perfect record of catching hornyposting in the thread and that having a horny thread doesn't actually deter anyone from hornyposting in the main thread (source: trust me bro), therefore the mods should just give up and there should be no restrictions on hornyposting. It's possible I'm completely misunderstanding their actual stance, but if I am hearing this right, I don't even know how this is a debate. Correct me if I'm mistaken and their actual stance is something less moronic.

>>200414 >that the porn spam is only coming from a small group of individuals I can say that most of the reports we get about hornyposting go to the same ~5 posters pretty much every time. I didn't understand why didn't just use the horny thread because I didn't realize just how abandoned the horny thread felt to them, so I'm hoping things improve now.

>>200436 Give it time and see what happens. Sure there are some members of this community who are inherently belligerent or spiteful, but I like to think that most people can generally sort things out on their own and aren't trying to actively destroy their own watering hole.

>>200436 *abandoned by the moderation, just to be precise

>>200409 Then you have 1 (one) official apology, weirdo screamo guy.

>>200457 Now I can take this admittance of wrongdoing to further shield myself from criticism in the future.

>>200385 As I said a few threads ago, I'd say that lewd jumps and flat out trying to start lewd topics (does your jumper rape or get raped? etc.) should go to the horny thread. I'm fine with mild lewd tangents that spin off from a normal topic people are already taking about though, so long as they don't go on for to long.

>>200410 >>200414 >>200460 Who gets to decide what constitutes an NSFW jump? The IRC Illuminati? Are we allowed to post Harem Kingdom, a porno jump on our own drive? What about Baalbuddy? It was banished to QQ for being too lewd. Are we allowed to post Baalbuddy pictures only outside the context of the jump? And of course, once you're not allowed to post "horny" jumps in the main thread for fear of punishment, that gives the prudes instant "proof" that even the poster agrees that the jump is too lewd for the drive, and never mind the dozen examples of more lewd jumps already there.

>>200465 So you're just a faggot trying to get QQ jumps on our Drive. Good to know.

>>200465 I guess I'll start by saying that I'm not the drive police and I don't really care about drive autism in general, so I'm not trying to argue about what goes on whatever drive. My personal opinion would be that a jump counts as nsfw if you can't have a conversation about it without getting into the porn aspects, but that's just me.

>>200465 The person who decides whether it is NFSW or not has always been the jumpmaker and not the community. If a jumpmaker decides the jump is NFSW, then it is NFSW, done. If a jumpmaker makes porn and wants to host it on a public drive, then that community should be the one to decide whether the jump is hosted or not. If the community decide to reject the jump, then no love lost, the jumpmaker can either find somewhere else to host it or they can do the logical thing and host it on their own drive. If the community refuses to agree on whether a jump should be kept on "their" drive, then err on the side of caution and don't upload it. This kind of thing should just be common sense, but this community thankfully hasn't had to deal with the other side of this involving people uploading illegal content like Democrat activismography onto the drives.

>>200465 I mean, as the jumpmaker I generally know whether or not my jump is NSFW or not. I don't think any part of this discussion has been about a lack of being able to tell whether a jump is NSFW or not in the first place. It certainly isn't unclear with regards to the jump that kicked this off. Also I don't believe that has been any kind of community consensus on allowing porn jumps on the main drive after the creation of the bunker? I don't think anything has changed on that front?

>>200478 >I don't think anything has changed on that front? What hasn't changed is the thread hivemind's random and schizophrenic standards about what does or doesn't count as too lewd for the drive. To recount: >Baalbuddy draws porn, so the jump for his joke setting about elves not getting laid was banished to QQ. >One Year Lease is blatant giantess fetishism from a fetish porn website, but it doesn't feature explicit sex so it goes on the drive. That didn't save Some Bullshit from being sent to QQ for being a feeder fetish setting, which in turn didn't stop Changed from going on the drive despite being latex furry fetish. And Link Makes a Wish got on the drive despite not only being fetish stuff, but being just the technically SFW parts of NSFW fetish videos uploaded as a commercial for the full porn version. >Majikoi and God Catching Alchemy Meister, both porn games with regular plots, are on the drive. >Shimai Maou no Testament and Slave Harem in Another World both have explicit sex scenes in stories that revolve around sex and are on the drive, but The Last Sovereign was removed for that exact reason. >Harem Kingdom, a porn game with no plot other than a guy fucking his harem, was allowed on the drive. Of those Some Bullshit, Changed, Link Makes a Wish, and The Last Sovereign all had their discussions about whether they should be allowed right here on the bunker, with a running 50/50 split on whether the thread allowed them. If the prudes were able to spam report the jumps and get them thrown off the main thread, the thread would have never been able to come to the decision to accept Changed or Link Makes a Wish. "The mods kicked it out of the general thread, it MUST be lewd!" The rhetoric writes itself.

>>200481 Ok but that feels like an entirely different discussion from "should the horny jumps go in the horny thread" beyond a slippery slope fallacy.

>>200477 >Democrat activismography These filters man lmao Speaking of democrat activismography, apparently the spam bots don't send appeals. If 9anon sees this, do you think we should clear up some of the bans? Just looking at the way some of the other boards do things it seems like we may have gone a little too strong.

>>200486 How do you ban horny jumps from the general thread without defining what a horny jump is? What usable definition of horny jump could anyone construct that doesn't catch some jumps already on our drive?

Incorrect answers only: complete the following proverb. "Early to bed, early to rise..."

>>200539 For anons is an unachievable prize.

I think I've been stressing about this too much. My inability to sleep probably isn't helping either. The horny thread is seeing proper use now so I'm just going back to my reactive vibe-based approach instead acting like some kind of uberjanny. Don't be afraid to send reports or complain here if you want to bring something to our attention though.

>>200608 Go sleep

>>200608 Take a good rest.

>>200410 My stance is that I simply adamantly refuse to use the horny thread fullstop. It has been nothing but mindless porn spam and not even of shit I particularly like, but mostly all kinds of junk from overly futa to being just plain dull fetish wise. I have like one actual porn jump that I'm working on (I've been thinking of doing others, but never committed) and if the situation is just going to be "post them to the horny thread" where any setting to the right of a cock or a boob can't be posted to the mean thread, then it's easier and less of a headache to simply not post or talk about them any at all. It was bad enough when I was doing Changed and it has seemingly only gotten worse instead of better.

>>200640 Not quite sure why you're responding specifically to me there. But like, half the recent discussion about the horny thread has been about the mods specifically stopping that kind of porn spam and making it a more general NSFW thread. And a quote 'actual porn jump' is surely the exact kind of thing that goes in the horny thread. I really don't get this weird "omg why would I post the horny thing in the place specifically for horny stuff?!" that people seem to be having.

>>200656 I think they're lashing out on the principle that they don't want to be pushed into another thread, and they want the main thread to be where they can devote all of their attention to.

I don't get what was wrong with the old rules. Spoiler NSFW images and otherwise anything was fine. It only seemed to become an issue when a shitposter found out it was a great way to rile up the community. How many of the reports come from the same IPs? I posted my last NSFW jump in the thread and there were zero complaints. >>200656 >>200671 I don't wanna keep two threads open.

>>200718 >I don't wanna keep two threads open. You don't have to. It's not like the horny thread moves with any degree of speed, and the main thread, even when its going fast, is at most 1 post per minute. You only need to check the horny thread at most like once an hour if you've posted something there, less if you haven't. And the times that people have posted lewd jumps to the horny thread, they've made sure to post to the main thread too to let people know.

>>200718 It ain't shitposters, mate, and it sure as heck isn't one person. I've made more Jumps for QQ than for here, and even I was getting real tired of constant horny spamming in the main thread. It started out fine, but it just kept getting more and more egregious every thread for the last few weeks. You can live with checking one extra thread every once and a while just like the rest of us.

>>200730 There's also less engagement.

>>200718 I have over 30 threads open and have never felt like I was having trouble keeping up or it was moving too fast. Is this a problem for people who only use a single thread? Do those people constantly refresh the thread looking for replies?

>>200656 >>200730 There's inherently less engagement with the horny thread like anon said. And more than that, I'm not going to constantly check another thread to see people's posts regarding my jump or if they're asking questions; I already sometimes forget to update the main thread due to life as it is and then have to scroll through hundreds of comments and conversations that I've missed. It would be worse micromanaging two, especially for one that is dead half the time and which is filled with shit I hate. I said it when I was doing Changed and I will once more reiterate it here: if the only place my jump can go or be discussed is to the horny thread, then I may as well not post it at all. It would get the same amount of engagement and attention from me with none of the drawbacks.

>>200841 I still fail to see how it's hard to just look at the replies of a post you make in the horny thread, you don't even need to reply it 24/7, that's not a massive effort.

>>200489 Eh, we can remove bans for CP Spam if there's an actual written appeal. Also, sleep, you aren't getting paid for this.

I'm just so tired of reading about FATE/TYPE MOON shit in the general thread. If I had a monkey's paw, even knowing it would somehow come back to bite me in the ass, I'd wish for all the Nasushit to be segregated to it's own thread.

>>202763 >anon wishes for all Nasuverse discussion to be exiled to its own thread >I promptly take over with Ordem Paranormal posting Balanced, as all things should be.

So what be your query regarding Cyberpunk modding?

>>205401 I know these mods may not be to your taste but I appreciate the help. I'm trying to figure out which of these sets of mods would be better/easier to install, one is a body mod while the other is a wearable chest mod: >Flat Chest Body for femV >https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/6883?tab=description >Flat Chest - Wearable Pecs for Fem >https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/15267?tab=description I prefer how the body mod looks but I don't know if the base clothing would be refit to it or if I would need the below refit mod and even if I had that as well it looks like I would need to spawn my clothing in. >Flat Chest Body - Clothing Refit >https://www.nexusmods.com/cyberpunk2077/mods/6884?tab=description Conversely the wearable chest mod comes with the below Flat Chest Detector mod which I think should automatically catch the base game clothing but i'm not sure, also I don't get how that would work with this one, if it would be an option in the character creation process or if I need to go to a ripper doc or some shit. I don't care about any other clothing mods right now just making sure it works with the base clothing sets.

>>205403 Try installing the stuff you want first and dip into character creation to see if it's automatically applied.

>>205407 Will do, thanks.

>>205407 I guess a better way would be: >Install just the body mod >Dip into character creation to see if you need to set it to any particular breast size option for it to work. >Load up a recent save to see if clothing is adjusted or not, hitting up a ripperdoc to change character customization if necessary. >If clothing isn't adjusted, install the mod that does that.

>>205410 I'll do it this way, thanks bud.

New jump? Tactical Assault Operative You just know A Dance with Slugs *battle music stops* *vihuela aggressively starts playing* JIDAN O KAKERU TSUMORI WANAI tec tec tec tec tec tec tec tec *trumpet enters the battle and slowly gets louder* TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC MUDADA *violin and guitars ear-raping everyone* THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC *fucking castanet solo out of nowhere* *reunion soldiers visibly shaken, all your other operators won't stop kneeling* tec tec tec tec tec tec tec tec *the ground keeps shaking with every attack, reunion soldiers turns into a blood mist while the instruments aggressively play on the background* TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC TEC *music suddenly stops* ... ..... KORE KOSO GA IBERIA.... NOOOO DEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSTTREEEEEEZZAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC THUC *the battlefield turns into an unholy mexican hellscape* *your operators lie down on the ground, out of fear* *spirits de los muertos start appearing, laughing while hovering at the fiery battlefield* *a rain of urchin cum starts* *screams of pain suddenly stops* ... wakata >Witnessed the Crimson Finale

>>206129 You ok anon?

Not sure who keeps global reporting Shard but if you're trying to bring something to our attention then you should know that we can't see those. Only bringing this up because I think this is the third time I've seen it in the logs and I'm not sure if it's malice or ignorance at play.

Test

>>206228 He witnessed the Crimson Finale.