The Vast Pharmaceutical Conspiracy to Silence Online Dissent
https://archive.ph/R2nLA
https://www.midwesterndoctor-com/p/the-vast-pharmaceutical-conspiracy
[Edited for length. See original for videos and images.]
>Summary:
>•There has been a coordinated campaign to attack and defame anyone who has spoken out against the covid-19 response. This has primarily been restricted to social media (e.g., getting people deplatformed) but it has also been weaponized in real life (e.g., getting medical licenses revoked).
>•This coordinated campaign was the result of a “non-profit” known as "The Public Good Project" (PGP), which was directly linked to the pharmaceutical industry. The PGP used the industry funding it received to defend industry interests.
>•Vaccine safety advocates were able to get into the group where these campaigns were coordinated. There they discovered numerous public figures working hand in hand with healthcare workers to silence anyone “promoting misinformation.”
>•Some of the influencers advancing PGP’s message through “Shots Heard” and its sister UN initiative “Team Halo” faked their credentials.
>Almost any viewpoint can be “proven” using the “correct” evidence and logic. I’ve successfully done this in the past with beliefs I consider to be abhorrent and completely disagree with. Once you become familiar with the process, you begin to gain an appreciation for how ephemeral the truth is and how problematic it is that most people have filters they see through reality through that lead to them doing this even if it’s not deliberate
I bet this guy believes everything he's been taught about Hitler and der nutsees.
>This realization directly conflicted with my deepest values, so my own way of seeing the world re-oriented around trying to discern what was actually true rather than proving I was right in the hopes the truth could become something tangible rather than this ephemeral fiction our hands and minds constantly passed through.
>In turn, a major reason why I approach most topics I present here by fairly presenting both sides is because I found it was one of the things necessary for me to pass through that ephemeral layer of truth that clouds almost everything.
>Despite this publication being about medicine, I’ve repeatedly focused on highlighting the work of public relations (PR), a massive invisible industry (e.g., 20 billion was spent on it in America last year) that continually shapes our perceptions of reality for its corporate and government clients.
>PR is the incredibly refined science of manipulating the public, and essentially is what lies [at the intersection of] propaganda and marketing.
>As the years have gone by, I’ve come to appreciate how much of what happens in medicine is actually a product of how the consciousness and collective beliefs about our society are altered so that pharmaceutical products can be sold and that it’s often a lost cause to try to debate the science behind a recommendation unless you understand the PR at play.
Just don't ask why one tiny tribe runs all the pharmaceutical companies and the government which pretends to regulate them, because we're not natzees over here.
>The “miracle” of PR is how effective it is, and I’ve now lost count of how many times an abhorrent policy that few Americans wanted was pushed through by a well financed PR campaign.
>For reference, some of the common PR tactics include:
>1. Organizing a massive amount of coverage of an event which supports someone’s narrative and was crafted to go viral. For example:
>•The founder of PR [a jew Edward Bernays] was infamous for convincing women across America to take up smoking by staging a women’s suffrage (right to vote) protest and having them all smoke their “liberation torches” as part of the protest).
>•The Gulf War was sold to America by a fake testimony from a Kuwaiti girl (who was the daughter of the ambassador) who was coaxed to say the rampaging Iraqi army was invading hospitals and “taking babies out of incubators and leaving them to die on the cold floor,” a line which was then repeated again and again by politicians (e.g., Bush) around the world.
>•In 2022, one actor made a joke about Will Smith’s wife having hair loss due to alopecia (a known side effect of the mRNA vaccines) which quickly went viral on every network.
>This was very usual. However, it just so happened that Pfizer was sponsoring the Oscars, and had just announced a positive result in their pivotal phase 2b/3 trial clinical trial for their new alopecia drug, and had recently begun the marketing push in anticipation of its FDA approval (which happened exactly a year later, with an annual course of the drug being priced at $49,000.00).
>While it’s impossible to know what actually happened behind the scenes, individuals did come forward alleging the whole thing was scripted.
>2. Hiring focus groups to determine what language is the most effective in persuading people to support your position and then blasting it on every public announcement and news station simultaneously. This often goes hand in hand with producing news programs for the stations (which are effectively PR productions for their sponsors).
>3. Creating an endless number of “non-profit” organizations with nice names that actually advance the interests of the sponsoring industry. For example, the “non-profit” Foundation for Clean Air Progress is an industry front group that has aggressively lobbied both the public and the government to reduce the existing air quality standards mandated by the Clean Air Act. Likewise, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society took in 172 million dollars last year and is notorious for blocking many proven treatments for MS from seeing the light of day, while continuously supporting lucrative new drugs to “manage” the disease.
>4. Paying off an endless number of experts to promote your message and having them be hosted on networks that are already in your pocket.
Oh and doesn't ask why one tribe owns the central banks and all other banks, and thus are the only tribe that can afford all this bribery. You some kinda nazi, buddy?
>Note: two things allowed me to accurately predict most of what happened during covid-19. One was being familiar with the same script having been followed during the HIV epidemic, and the other was seeing the PR campaigns for it be enacted in real time and recognizing the implications of each stage I observed (as the campaigns are typically structured in a sequential series of steps which eventually arrive at their sponsor’s desired outcome).
Interesting how the nazis were able to predict that muh Holo-Hamas attack would be used to pass anti-semitism laws around the world.
>The primary thing which has allowed the PR model to work is the (ever increasing) monopoly over the mass media. Because of this, a chosen PR campaign can be rapidly disseminated across the country while simultaneously, no dissenting narratives are allowed to air that challenge it.
Getting tired of this: who owns the media? Another question you can't ask.
>Recognizing that the internet was the fatal weakness of the existing system, I suspect (but can’t prove) that a decision was made to have large internet companies become gatekeepers of information online, and in turn, as these large platforms attracted a large enough audience to become the “trusted sources” of information, they slowly transitioned to censoring things.
Coincidentally Elon Musk is an ashkenazi jew as well. When he bought twitter he started promoting a lot of jewish and pro-jewish accounts, and "de-boosting" and shadow-banning White nationalist accounts.