>>45238 discord is going public, they're obviously going to have stricter moderation to appease the jewish shareholders

>>45240 what posts had images but were deleted? and what were the images?

This whole damn thread is in need of correction.

>>35300 Discord is not the place for that you absolute glownigger.

>>40292 The rates of sexual abuse in japan are greatly underreported. A man was acquitted of raping his daughter because she wasnt actively fighting (though he was later convicted of it on appeal).

>>45810 >The rates of sexual abuse in japan are greatly underreported If that claim is accurate, what's the "true" sexual abuse rate then? Is there even an estimate?

>>45811 Obviously its better than countries like India and authoritarian hellstates like the UAE or Saudi Arabia. But that's a very hard question to answer. How much crime goes unreported is a question everywhere. Maybe you could go off of surveys of people who said they were abused rather than just looking at crime stats. I don't think loli is the reason for it, but its worth noting that actual CP was legal in japan till 2014 or so.

>>45811 So high that japs aren't allowed to have their camera shutter sound turned off because they'll go around taking creepshots of every woman they find on a train

>>45814 >I don't think loli is the reason for it, but its worth noting that actual CP was legal in japan till 2014 or so. Most countries with those laws outside of the Five Eyes just passed them to avoid international condemnation. Countries like Russia, India, Pakistan, Japan, etc. aren't actually arresting people for it. Their laws aren't enforced so they're fake.

>>45814 >Obviously its better than countries like India and authoritarian hellstates like the UAE or Saudi Arabia. But the stats are not being compared to India, the UAE, or Saudi Arabia. It's being compared to the United Kingdom. So how do the "correct" stats compare to the UK? >But that's a very hard question to answer. No, it's not. If the crime is known to be THAT badly reported and the stats are known to be faked THAT' much, then people must know about other methods to measure such activities taking place. This is done with every country that publishes "fake statistics". From "transparent" countries like America: archive.ph/WxH08 To "locked down" authoritarian and totalitarian regimes like West Taiwan: odysee.com/@ChinaUncensored:0/china’s-economy-is-weaker-than-you:6 So where is your proof that the presented rates of sexual abuse taking place in Japan is fake, and "fake enough" to the point that it defeats any and all attempts to use it as a discussion point? >>45815 >japs aren't allowed to have their camera shutter sound turned off because they'll go around taking creepshots of every woman they find on a train Isn't that true for EVERY country though? From the subways in NYC and LA to the Underground in the England and all the other railway lines in Europe.

>>45814 >actual CP was legal in japan till 2014 or so. I'm pretty sure it was 2000. I'm sure because bestiality used to be legal until 2010, and it doesn't make sense to not ban CP first.

>>45818 >No, it's not. If the crime is known to be THAT badly reported and the stats are known to be faked THAT' much, then people must know about other methods to measure such activities taking place. This is done with every country that publishes "fake statistics". From "transparent" countries like America: archive.ph/WxH08 There is a difference between stats being fake and stats being underreported or counted differently in different countries. Note that the stats in the image were from 2014: >>40292 Japanese laws on rape were only changed in 2017: https://archive.today/https://www.japantimes.co.jp/commentary/2024/04/10/japan/sexual-violence-japan-nhk-survey/ Here's some studies that talk about why in may be underreported: https://archive.today/https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-asian-studies/article/is-rape-a-crime-in-japan/E5A43CF9D262C99C350C557A8419EB3B >>45815 apparently that sort of voyeurism was only (fully) criminalized in 2023 and the laws on it varied from region to region: archive.ph/Kvq4f https://archive.today/https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-65453384

>>45831 Posession was legal till 2014: https://archive.today/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_pornography_laws_in_Japan

>>45842 post yer creepy pedo shit in the pedo forum you pervert

Is there a word filter on Democrat activismography?

>>45902 Looks like there is. I wonder if it still filters when you put a dash inbetween. child-porn.

The word filter of "Democrat activism" to "Сhild Роrn" and "Сhild Sех" to "posting on /leftypol/" is obnoxious and makes legitimate discussion harder.

>>34033 >>34004 >We all know that every imageboard that lets pedo content run amuck is a fed honeypot also >>35459 >Loli and CP has always been spammed by feds and useful idiot discord trannies >>35485 >cp spam is feds and 764fags >>35468 >CP is feds since it can get a website taken down if the volume is too high. It's not the feds or the government doing the CP spam. People don't spam CP to take down sites. The spam is an advertisement. People are doing it to make money. https://archive.today/https://trashchan.xyz/meta/thread/374.html

>>45919 >Ruling3: Global Filters and the pedo keyword attacks >The site has enabled several global text filters covering all manner of pedo related content. Attempting to post any filtered terms (eg. "sex with un///derage") will generally result in the term being replaced with something more whimsical. >>Why >An attack was mounted against the site by some users repeatedly posting certain keywords and key phrases related to child abuse activity. These keywords were taken verbatim from a list of known identifiers that multiple government agencies use to identify and shut down CP sites. These users were hoping to draw the attention of the network of bot crawlers used by these government agencies and trick the bots into automatically flagging the site as a CP site by presenting them with a large number of keyword "hits." Even though we do not permit illegal content, the risk of a knee-jerk reaction by some government organization bringing the site down until the matter could be sorted out is reasonably high, so the known keywords themselves and their derivative phrases are not permitted.

>>45921 I don't think the risk is actually that high. There's pedophile sites that are pro-contact and legally exist on the clear web. I am skeptical that they'd ban 8chan just because someone was spamming text. I've heard of crawlers automatically sending requests to take down CP images or downloads, but I haven't heard of them automatically flagging sites over text.

>>45928 I'm suspect that's a certain community of CP traders that are using a 4chan proxy service to "troll" 4chan. /g/ has issues with them.

>>29699 This ignores context of the study. The rings are inclusive, and dont indicate comparative preference.

>>24501 >>31685 >>37599 >Character is Hat Kid from "A Hat in Time". Our faggot 1pbtid OP's image looks like it is just another sourceless AI slop pic. I don't think it's AI generated. I put it in a detector and it came back negative.

>>46033 made a thread asking for the source: https://archive.today/https://boards.4chan.org/r/thread/19884208

Someone was recently arrested for having loli in Ireland.

哈哈哈哈

>>46122 I think it normalizes sex outside of marriage by implying it is permitted above a certain age. At the same time, I don't think getting rid of AoC in the current culture would lead a return of early marriage, it would lead to teenage prostitutes. Marriage as an institution has be fixed and the general culture shifted to a family-building mindset from a pleasure-seeking mindset before the age question should be addressed. Taking away women's rights would be a huge step in the right direction.

>>46124 >and the general culture shifted to a family-building mindset from a pleasure-seeking mindset That's already happening. People are being priced out of the ability the buy a home, so you have more families living together today rather than the kids leaving as soon as they become adults.

>>46142 Incels without a future living in their parent's house until death isn't exactly what I had in mind...

>>46149 >Incels Begone THOT!!!

>>46150 kek

>>34365 >>35406 >That chart is disinfo. There is no such data in the corresponding study. The actual conclusion is more interesting. >>35418 >spoonfeed me https://archive.today/https://sci-hub.se/https://archive.today/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80039-5 alternate link to pdf: https://archive.today/https://gwern.net/doc/psychiatry/1995-hall.pdf

>>46156 >Study is based on what gave guys an erection That's not how biology fucking works! It's like all the female pedos that try to use the excuse that an erection is "proof of conscent", which innumerable scientists have proven that there is no correlation.

basically nude underage anime girls is allowed. Pedophiles should be offed. There is no way I would agree nor convinced that pedophilia or lolicon is good.

>>46159 I agree with the proof of consent part But have you never had problems getting ur d hard or proper hard beause the "visual stimuli" is so fucking bad? This is a pretty normal thing for men. Women can get so terribly upset when you don't get properly hard or can't cum even due to alchohol because if you cant cum or get properly hard they feel they're not good enough or for schizo women that u must be cheating.

>>46193 >But have you never had problems getting ur d hard or proper hard beause the "visual stimuli" is so fucking bad? Outside of when I willingly search out content, not really, but I have had my dick getting hard for completely unrelated and random reasons. Which also imposes another variable on the experiment that they didn't account for. Where the guys getting hard because they went in knowing they would be visually stimulated, or was it entirely "natural"? What about the fact that the experiment was dependent on a scientists watching their cocks during the entire slideshow, and how that alters things because some people are exhibitionists? And so on. Again, it isn't as "cut and dry" as the study makes it out to be.