>>25416 >It encourages short-term thinking (4 year terms), over long-term planning >>25440 >Not necessarily and not all Democracies have 4 year terms. Power being inherited by the ruler's children promotes long-term planning instead of 4-8 years (democracy) or lifetime of the ruler (fascism). By corruption/embezzlement, king robs his literal family.

I wish people would stop pretending that invading Poland was le evil. If you want to be a great power you’re going to end up kicking your neighbors’ doors down and taking their shit. The world is all spoken for so might makes right. Be on your nation’s team or fuck off.

>>25948 Gdańsk/Gduńsk is rightful Kashubian land no matter how many Germans live there, just like Amsterdam is Dutch land despite being only 40% Dutch.

>>25410 Democracy allows feminism and degeneracy to flourish. Not only that, any group with interests not aligned with the nation can take positions of power because of it. Getting weak and complacent like this is how we die from the inside.

>Solves the Birth Rates is killing young men in war really an improvement? >Solves the economy How, by plundering your neighbors? It solves it for some and ruins it for others >Solves morality It's *a* moral system but I wouldn't call it a good one >Makes the population happy or at least pretend to be, because they get thrown in jail if they complain

>>25416 True also democracy requires a minimum intelligence of the population

>>25466 >he blew it all on a pointless war kikes literally forced it on him as soon as they saw how much of a threat he was becoming to their profits

>>25394 >sends you to die in a meaningless war "for your country" One of the most cucked political systems.

Neo-fascism is just another pathetic aesthetic of the many being exploited to keep the system of corporate neo-feudalism afloat. It's all a scam. Fascism does not solve your capitalistic woes and it only consolidates power in the hands of the wealthy and decadent. Which is, as you're all well aware, synonym with "this shit's a gay as fuck jewish trick. The solution is to migrate responsible democracy (home ownership and vested economic interest/real IQ to vote) into a sort of anarchism (redistribution of wealth) for the benefit of the many, to watch Jews and niggers seethe. Remember, if someone's asking you to hand power over, they're telling you you're incompetent and shit's too fucked, only THEY can fix it: shalom.

If someone's trying to be a messiah, don't forget, that's their oldest trick!

>>25394 Every system promises all that. What makes fascism different? We had fascism before. Incompetent proles in elite positions used public resources for personal vanity projects, while the common workers suffered rationing of basic foods and textiles.

Etna sama....

>>25394 I understand wanting to start a coup and overthrow the government that seems masculine and exciting, but who is going to be king? fucking aspie elon? gross

>>25394 When you say fascism makes the population happy, whose happiness matters—and what makes a person matter in that system?

>>45316 >White men's happiness is what matters Okay. And do you think a "white person" is happy living under a system that will have them excluded, if not arrested, for not worshipping the state?

>>25394 Because its socialism and believing in it makes you no different from the woke niggers. You both tax your citizens to shit, claim to empower a race but because of your shit economics, You make them much poorer than a construction worker in the modern world. If you're gonna do fascism, better have it as a free market economy unless you wanna get raped by the allies again

>>25394 You wanna know why white man won't accept Fascism? Because white man is as stupid as niggers. Only about 10% of the white population is smart enough to think for themselves. The other 90% are literally white niggers. Will Pierce talked about the Lemmings a lot. >>25516 Britain and Russia started the war, you fucking lying faggot. Read "Churchhill's War" and "The Chief Culprit." Also, gas yourself, you fucking kike. >>25519 Jew >>25647 >In short im a nigger faggot npc Why do all jews want to be gassed so bad? >>25656 Everything you said is jewish lies. KYS kike. >>25666 >post proofs or you're a passive homosexual jew faggot Trips proves the jew is a faggot. >>25712 >These are lengthy articles, so I'll just do some quick hits of them: >posts kosher mainstream "news" sources. I legit though you were a jew. Turns out you're just a stupid white nigger. The fucking subhuman anglo-swine and slavic slavemen murdered millions of whites, you fucking nigger. >>25811 And you finally reveal yourself. A fucking Strasserist. Now everything makes sense. >I would never support an organization or individual that was complicit in executing traitors Those who tolerate or protect traitors are no different from traitors themselves. >>26368 I expected a Jap poster to be smarter than this. I'm just going to assume you're anglo. >>32914 Sure thing, Shekelberg. Marxism will work, we trust you, Shekelberg. >>45318 Fascism does not arrest people for not worshipping the state, you fucking lying communist. The only people who were arrested were literal communists. >>45319 Kill yourself you fucking libertarian piece of shit. You're literally a fucking white jew. You deserve to get raped by niggers. Capitalism is a jewish construct. Read some Henry Ford, nigger, and stop eating jewish ass. Ludwig von Mises and Ayn Rand are jewish propagandists. IMO The next night of the Long Knives must include Libertarians along with the Communists, for they are just as bad, if not, even more subversive. Also all white men must be tested for Jewish blood if even 1% of their blood is Jewish, they must be mandatorily sterilized and banned from all positions of social influence. Of course this will include almost the entirety of the Anglo-Saxon sub race, as well as the Slavic sub race. The anglos and the slobs Have Spent far too long interbreeding with Jews. They're complicity in Jewish subversion will end.

>>45325 >Fascism does not arrest people for not worshipping the state >The only people who were arrested were literal communists. How do you distinguish the two?

>>45333 Question: Does this book ever seek to address going after the people pushing for concepts like open borders, ethnic genocide, and everything else? Because it seems like it's a lot of talking about shit that people aready agree with. In which case, why even read it when, at worst, it's going to be preaching the same religion as the people who WANT open borders and white genocide, except the demiurge is "Non-whiteness" instead of "Whiteness"?

>>25516 >The British had even been trying to appease him kek. the shabbos gov and birthplace of globohomo was trying to coexist with a separate country nearby

>>45354 No, it's not, because the result is that anyone who reads it, who has ZERO experience with this shit, will become a raging Communist. Hell, the image even implies that "whiteness" does not necessarily correlate with "white people" as it directly says: <There really is no such thing as a generic white person. And one you declare that, it opens the door for the argument that it's possible for ANYONE to be or not to be a "white person". Which results in the exact situation we have now, where unironic niggers are "white nationalists" while 100% ethnically/genetically/genologically white people are seen as more representative of "Black people" than the blackest nigger gorilla you can find in the heart of Afrika.

>>25394 Fascism puts the party first with a nationalist facade instead of the hammer and sickle. Sure, state and corporations intermingling more than Lockheed and the State Dept is a *better* system than collectivism and bread lines, but USA in the early 70s was better. Nixon was the best president that we've had and it's a damn shame that the Jews got rid of him, do an Early Life check on everyone involved on getting him kicked out and check the context of the "smoking gun" tapes. Also, Evola makes good criticisms about fascism and fuck niggers and nigger worshippers, lol.

>>45358 >but USA in the early 70s was better. Just tell us you love niggers dude >inb4 the pic is from 1957

>>45358 >but USA in the early 70s was better. Nixon was the best president that we've had https://archive.today/https://infogalactic.com/info/Nixon_Shock <The Nixon shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, in response to increasing inflation, the most significant of which were wage and price freezes, surcharges on imports, and the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. <While Nixon's actions did not formally abolish the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange, the suspension of one of its key components effectively rendered the Bretton Woods system inoperative. While Nixon publicly stated his intention to resume direct convertibility of the dollar after reforms to the Bretton Woods system had been implemented, all attempts at reform proved unsuccessful. By 1973, the Bretton Woods system was replaced de facto by the current regime based on freely floating fiat currencies. <... <The Nixon Shock has been widely considered to be a political success, but an economic mixed bag in bringing on the stagflation of the 1970s and leading to the instability of floating currencies. The dollar plunged by a third during the 1970s. According to the World Trade Review's report "The Nixon Shock After Forty Years: The Import Surcharge Revisited", Douglas Irwin reports that for several months, U.S officials could not get other countries to agree to a formal revaluation of their currencies. The German Mark appreciated significantly after it was allowed to float in May 1971. Further, the Nixon Shock unleashed enormous speculation against the dollar. It forced Japan's central bank to intervene significantly in the foreign exchange market to prevent the yen from increasing in value. Within two days August 16–17, 1971, Japan's central bank had to buy $1.3 billion to support the dollar and keep the yen at the old rate of ¥360 to the dollar. Japan's foreign exchange reserves rapidly increased: $2.7 billion (30%) a week later and $4 billion the following week. Still, this large-scale intervention by Japan's central bank could not prevent the depreciation of US dollar against the yen. France also was willing to allow the dollar to depreciate against the franc, but not allow the franc to appreciate against gold (Page 14 Douglas). Even much later, in 2011, Paul Volcker expressed regret over the abandonment of Bretton Woods: "Nobody's in charge," Volcker said. "The Europeans couldn't live with the uncertainty and made their own currency and now that's in trouble." <In 1996, economist Paul Krugman (Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, 2008) summarized the post-Nixon Shock era as follows: >The current world monetary system assigns no special role to gold; indeed, the Federal Reserve is not obliged to tie the dollar to anything. It can print as much or as little money as it deems appropriate. There are powerful advantages to such an unconstrained system. Above all, the Fed is free to respond to actual or threatened recessions by pumping in money. To take only one example, that flexibility is the reason the stock market crash of 1987—which started out every bit as frightening as that of 1929—did not cause a slump in the real economy. While a freely floating national money has advantages, however, it also has risks. For one thing, it can create uncertainties for international traders and investors. Over the past five years, the dollar has been worth as much as 120 yen and as little as 80. The costs of this volatility are hard to measure (partly because sophisticated financial markets allow businesses to hedge much of that risk), but they must be significant. Furthermore, a system that leaves monetary managers free to do good also leaves them free to be irresponsible—and, in some countries, they have been quick to take the opportunity. Yeah, Dick, thanks a fucking lot!

>>25416 What country imports outside labour over civil labour because who would do that but you what groups do that.. corporation for cheap labour and for your military force under a fascism would be more foreigners then a democracy and stability fascism is highly unstable form of governance because fascism needs a group to hate to control prower unlike democracy which they work by popular opinion so they don't need hate to keep prower

>>45360 The early 70s was a time where the whites enjoyed life in Small Town America and suburbia. The niggers seethed in their new city dwellings with poor whites that got fed up with niggotry really quick. Black Panthers got the knee on the neck and the negroes stayed separate from whites for the most part. Not until the late 70s with the advent of Disco did you have more nigger integration(limited). Obama destroyed this nation with unlimited Section 8 housing, putting niggers everywhere. Anyways, fascism seems cool but it's really gay because the state and the corporations are spitroasting you, but it's still a lot better than communism(there's never been a fascist famine).

>>25394 >fascism

>>45486 >White Unity great idea!

>>45486 based

facism doesn't work because humans are inherently evil. explain to me how having one 1984 style ruler would be a positive thing at all for any country? there are books about this retard

>>45781 False, only niggers and jews are inherently evil. If humans were inherently evil in general civilization wouldn't be possible in the first place. >there are books about this Being written in a book doesn't make something true.

>>45472 but wait there is moar

>>25440 >Here are obvious negatives of not having a democracy: >>No free speech >implying that letting communists, groomers and school trannies roam and speak freely is a good thing >>Rampant abuse of power and nepotism >implying that democracy is free of these things and is more just than traditional power schemes >>25454 >finds a few examples of monarchies that failed their people (still could be argued but let's give him that) >can't point out one recent democracy that hasn't been entirely eaten inside out by Jews or a typical Jewish materialist mindset

>>45781 >1984 is fascism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The state of.

>>45365 >libertarian warm take >>45367 I love blatant invasions when I see them and this is one of them. > corporation for cheap labour and for your military force under a fascism would be more foreigners then a democracy Literally the opposite of reality. You're psychotic. > fascism is highly unstable form of governance because fascism needs a group to hate to control prower unlike democracy which they work by popular opinion so they don't need hate to keep prower lol The democratic USA have certainly not hated fascists, communists and muslims. You hate the people you need to hate. Period. Fascism does not need to hate, but it will hate those who directly destroy a nation's health. IOW, go back to Reddit.