>>39870
I'm not here peddling revisionist history nor am I here to convince anyone that 4chan was ever a bastion of Internet Christianity. It wasn't. But this idea that chan culture is static and there is no possible evolution or maturity of a platform is pretty cringe. Specifically, I would like to address your last point:
>The hyper-religious CHRIST IS KING crowd continuously bark and cry for censorship of a lot of the things 4chan was built around and label most of the pillars of imageboard culture as being degenerate/blasphemous/satanic and it's opened the floodgates for 4chan to get flooded with puritan prudes who are afraid of porn on a website where you're always two-three clicks away from accessing loli futanari hentai.
Porn is evil and it darkens the intellect. IS COFFEE GOOD FOR YOU threads is literally a psyop made to make you dumb, disinterested and uninvested.
Also, what exactly is the argument against censorship? It worked against us, didn't it? Wasn't it quite effective in suppressing the right-wing reactionaries? So why can't you use this against your enemies that are peddling evil like poisoning children, both bodily and spiritually?
Whenever I touch this topic, I'm always called a redditor, which I find very strange because people seem to be arguing for the destruction of online discussion spaces. I don't think 4/pol/ should ever be expressly right-wing or what have you, but you need to crack down on porn and tribalist bullshit like performative blasphemy that serves only to alienate your own natural political allies and drown out any sort of productive discussion in noise.
Finally, Christianity is consequential. It's not the poison that people pretend it to be online for extremely silly reasons. It has a profound impact in the spiritual health of any nation and our current problems are directly correlated with the West's spiritual decline. Besides, I do not see the church of Aryan blood stepping up to fill the void, and all (other) materialist solutions similarly fail. First principles are important, and in a sufficiently mature online space, they should be discussed seriously.