>>24603
>OK, but with all the economic freedom we've established, people are unhealthier than ever
Okay. Why are you
choosing to live an unhealthy lifestyle?
>and the environment is being degraded and
Yeah, in authoritarian countries like West Taiwan. Meanwhile America is thriving much more ecologically than when the Indians were the only people here.
>Libertarianism might work in a pure ethnostate with high IQ people
That's the same argument used for why authoritarian states always fail, that the people were not racially/ideologically "pure" and/or lacked a high IQ.
>and the whole EU
The EU is not, and has never been, an example of Libertarianism, or even Capitalism for that matter. European nations have always had some flavor of Socialism since the 1880's.
>since we don't have western monarchies anymore
Yes, you do. In England, Spain, Denmark, Norway, and Sweden just to name a few.
>in others respects, they somehow had looser rules then, say, Commiefornia
In what way, specifically?
>If it were up to muh democracy you would be killed for anything from racism to lolicon to uttering the N word one time.
Yet everyone is being racist on the internet and anime is the most popular mediums of entertainment at this current moment.
>Thing is, using the printing press as a parallel, we can see a lot of the shit people use to dissent would exist with or without the aid of democracy.
The printing press is an example of the decentralization of control over the types of works that can be published. In other words,
you were depriving the government of control and handing the decisions to the people. That exactly is an example of the democratic process.
>>24630
>The problem is that the demographics of Chicago, LA and Detroit exist in the first place - a problem created by the indulgences of unrestrained capitalism bringing them here.
Actually, no. The reason those cities are the shit-holes they are is because of the city governments centralizing power. In Chicago and Detroit, the most blatant example of this is how all industries in those cities are controlled by the unions, who basically control a monopoly on who can work and when because of government regulations, so companies began bringing in exports from Japan because there was no such regulations there. Similar thing with California, except instead of industry laws, it's all the bullshit environmental laws, that could result in you going to jail because you accidentally killed a literal fucking mouse.
>what the corrosive effects of runaway capitalism has done to our people
Made the individual almost exclusively responsible on how it is that they live their lives?
>>25436
>there will be competing influences that could fracture the community
That's going to happen no matter what political system is implemented.
>since money will ultimately decide who has the most power in this city
No, it doesn't.
>what do you do when the CEO's son wants to bring a Filipina to marry and reproduce with?
the CEO could disown him and cut him off from his wealth, like many families have done in the past. In fact, the Japanese imperial family currently is suffering from this issue because too many descendants of the imperial lines have married "commoners", and therefore forfeited their ability to ascend to the throne.
>What do you do when someone wants to bring pajeet workers for their IT project?
That would be a matter for the government step in because the pajeets are a foreign people who have no place in the country. However in the instance that there is no government, then it's the job of the customer to begin getting their IT products and services from a different company. And if there is no other company, then they start up their own or make do without the service/product
>Yes, other people can resist him, but the point is that there will unnecessary conflict
How?
>Also, who plans this city?
It used to be the mortgage and construction companies who unironically planned city layouts and provided all the infrastructure.
>Who would be the centralized command, an association of business owners?
Trade organizations pop up all the time.
>Everything they do in regards to the city will only have profit in mind, then.
Yes, and? The result would be those companies doing everything possible to entice people to come to
THEIR city as opposed to someone else's.
>If you look at the closest thing we actually have to an AnCap state, which is Orania in South Africa
What about much of the rest of the African continent, that has no formal government and is overrun with warlords?
>>25637
>Not necessarily, a community can value something more than money.
Not really. In fact, many of the communes that sprouted up during the 70's tried that and every single one of them failed due to it turning the community into essentially a cult/feudal establishment.
>Ancap/libertarianism is a set of rules to attempt to solve conflicts[Expand Post]
No, it's not. Ancap is anarchy, which is the complete LACK of rules and customs.
>>25908
>as we've seen with corps and activistic subversives taking advantage to weaponize institutions against dissidents
Aren't innumerable companies and institutions now begging for money from the government because no one is supporting them anymore?