>>25610
>Kek, the dumb kike unmasked himself so quickly when I chokeslammed him on his last post.
When did this happen? I don't see any "chokeslamming".
>That's the rubble of Dresden, a warcrime committed by the British government. It had literally nothing to do with Hitler
No, that's objectively wrong. Hitler chose to invade Poland, triggering WW2. And don't give me any bullshit about "dey deserved dat clay". He chose violence; he chose war. Dresden is on him and was completely avoidable.
>The entirety of the weimar government sold out to Jewish financiers and was letting German kids get prostituted and raped.\
Muh Weimar. Has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. NS Germany was still rife with corruption.
>The Deutschmark was literally worth NOTHING in Weimar Germany
Muh Weimar again. Do you have any arguments that you can actually make yourself? You consider an entire generation of youth being killed off in war as an improvement in quality of life? Or the rich being able to squeeze the shit out of small businesses because Hitler pandered to them?
>Literally all testimony from the time period, both international
From who? Britain thought the Germans were idiots because of Ribbentrop. Mussolini regularly talked shit about Hitler. Poland was in constant fear of them.
>within Germany
You mean propaganda? Why would the Nazis air any dissent about them? Did you forget they would put those people to death, including even youths?
>You have to be willingly dishonest to imply the leap in fertility under Nazi Germany wasn't directly due to Nazi policy.
Well, not really, since the rest of the West also had a babyboom not long after, so logically, we can deduce that there were other factors at work besides Hitler's policies. And to be clear, I'm not saying that they weren't good policies and didn't contribute. I'm saying they weren't the sole cause. I don't shit on everything he did, but it was all pointless because he killed a generation of youth with it.
>Its called efficient mobilisation of the working age German population, who are some of the smartest and most efficient people
Which is war, which has a steep cost. You're also accidentally conceding that Germany's population basically guaranteed success. Even when the USSR was extorting Eastern Germany and had them in their dysfunctional grasp, the DDR was still the most successful economy in the USSR. It wasn't so much Hitler as it was the German people.
>Britain attacked Germany
Because Germany attacked Poland, a British ally. That was Germany's fault. Britain didn't instigate the war, Hitler did and that is indisputable.
If you want to keep worshipping a false idol, go ahead. Some of us actually want to make a difference.