You sound like an NPC.

>>25394 Cause I believe in democracy Tell me, what are your main criticisms of democracy that make you favour fascism as a political system

>>25410 Democracy is inefficient It encourages short-term thinking (4 year terms), over long-term planning It discourages keeping your nationals safe, look at what's happening in UK right now, Labour is just importing millions of voters, they don't care about the far future, because it's all just about winning the next election and keeping power

>>25416 >Democracy is inefficient Because of the talent of politicians or the understanding of voters? Just add a literacy test to the voting process >It encourages short-term thinking over long term planning Not necessarily and not all Democracies have 4 year terms. >It discourages keeping your nationals safe Belarus' dictator just announced he would be bringing in 250k Pakistani immigrants and that children born of Syrian men and Belarusian women are "the most beautiful" Here are obvious negatives of not having a democracy: >No free speech >No ability for educated individuals to contest politics >Rampant abuse of power and nepotism Maybe a short-term military junta might be needed to overthrow globohomo great replacement, but after that if it doesn't democratise the people are at the mercy of the dictator.

>>25416 Also before you say >democracies are exploited by Jews Consider the following: >Visigothic Spain, hereditary monarchy >Jews subverted the entire government then helped the Moors invade >Castillian Spain, hereditary monarchy >Crypto-Jews larping as christians (conversos) had complete control of the royal court in 1430AD, just decades before the Spanish Inquisition and Limpieza de sangre >1400s Russia, hereditary monarchy >Jewish infiltrators take over the Russian Orthodox Church and get the support of multiple nobles and Russian royalty

>>25416 And with fascism, if you have a bad leader, you're fucked. Hitler and Mussolini fucked Germany and Italy and Hitler is a big reason why we don't have as many White people walking around on the face of this Earth. All authoritarian systems live and die with the quality of their leaders. At this point, it's quite easy to see that's too much power for one person.

>>25459 Hitler had the perfect ideology called "national socialism" and he blew it all on a pointless war. Mussolini didn't do shit with fascism and his army sucked at war.

>>25466 I disagree about the supposed perfectness of National Socialism, but yes, they fucked up. That pretty much demonstrates how imperfect and flawed NS was, that it allowed Hitler to bungle his way to catastrophe, among other flaws. I know Hitler is the big guy around our circles, but he was mediocre and so was his ideology and should be moved on from as an incompetent rat that betrayed us all. This idolatry is getting us nowhere.

>>25486 We definitely need to move away from the failure of Hitler and create an ideology that fits in the modern world.

>>25459 >Hitler and Mussolini fucked Germany Hitler literally made Germany a paradise WTF are you talking about? He give 6 million NEETs employment, upped the birth rate from 1.5 to 3 and sent German industrial production into overdrive. British post WW2 literally burned and destroyed all of Germany's chemical manufacturing plants because they were afraid German rebels would create chemical weapons and counterattack the UK. Hitler didn't ruin Germany, Jews, the UK and shabbos Churchill did. Just because fascism means no freedom doesn't mean Hitler wasn't insanely based

>>25459 >>25459 >Semitic brain victim blaming >"Hitler is a big reason why we don't have as many White people walking around on the face of this Earth" >Not the literal globalist J-w financiers who were trying to open borders and replace White people anyway before German nationalists even stood up to them Tell me you're J----h without telling me you're J----h

>>25490 I agree. >Hitler literally made Germany a paradise WTF are you talking about? Pic related is a "paradise" to you? NS Germany was just a brainless worship of the state rife with corruption (see Christian Weber), incompetence (see Joachim Ribbentrop) and genuine evil (Roland Freisler). People had to work longer hours and there was more monopolization by big business. They also outlawed unions and took away workers' leverage. It was good to be rich in NS Germany and not so good if you were a small business or worker. >upped the birth rate from 1.5 to 3 How do you know this is directly attributable to Hitler? The US also had a baby boom not long after, despite having a society with even less social support. >German industrial production That's called war and it's not a good thing. It came at a steep cost. >Hitler didn't ruin Germany He did. He could've been happy with power, but chose to invade Poland. The British had even been trying to appease him, which Hitler-appointed Ribbentrop repeatedly bungled. What happened to Germany is squarely on his shoulders. He's a false idol, a traitor and a moron.

>>25498 >>25516

>>25489 I agree with you. Hitler belongs in the dust bin.

>>25410 >Tell me, what are your main criticisms of democracy That it just doesn't work.

>>25572 >80 to 90% of natives will support the retaining of their Ethno-Cultural cohesion *unconditionally* You're delusional. Xenophilia is high among people of European descent. >When did the Swedish people vote for the rape and murder of their own children by foreigners? They voted for someone that was a globalist and was open to diversity. The prime minister wasn't from the Sweden Democrats or a similar party. The unfortunate truth is that majority of White people, at least in Western Europe, support at the very least a moderate diversification of society.

>>25394 >>25516 Kek, the dumb kike unmasked himself so quickly when I chokeslammed him on his last post. >Pic related is a "paradise" to you? That's the rubble of Dresden, a warcrime committed by the British government. It had literally nothing to do with Hitler or National Socialist Germany. Why are you such a dishonest little rodent? Oh yeah because you aren't a Northern European, you're an inbred Jewish rat. Its in your genes. >NS Germany was just a brainless worship of the state rife with corruption The entirety of the weimar government sold out to Jewish financiers and was letting German kids get prostituted and raped. >People had to work longer hours and there was more monopolization by big business. They also outlawed unions and took away workers' leverage. It was good to be rich in NS Germany and not so good if you were a small business or worker. The Deutschmark was literally worth NOTHING in Weimar Germany and the Nazi government created one of the greatest labour schemes in Western history that took 6 million Germans out of unemployment and gave them a living wage. Literally all testimony from the time period, both international and within Germany, remarks on the stunning turnaround in quality of life Germany had under Hitler's leader >upped the birth rate from 1.5 to 3 >How do you know this is directly attributable to Hitler? The US also had a baby boom not long after, despite having a society with even less social support. Nazi Germany literally implemented MULTIPLE large-scale policies directly targeting the German national birthrate, including caps on women in higher education, an abortion ban, mass ban on contraceptives, financial and social credit bonuses for women who had more than 3 kids and removal of women from the labour pool, along with the aforementioned massive decline in unemployment for male bachelors. You have to be willingly dishonest to imply the leap in fertility under Nazi Germany wasn't directly due to Nazi policy. Lol. Such a worthless race of liars you are. >That's called war and it's not a good thing. It came at a steep cost. Its called efficient mobilisation of the working age German population, who are some of the smartest and most efficient people genetically on planet earth. >Hitler didn't ruin Germany He did. He could've been happy with power, but chose to invade Poland Britain attacked Germany and lost its Empire due to Jewish financiers. Stop lying you fucking victim blaming cross-eyed Jewish rat lmao

>>25410 >In short im a nigger faggot npc

>>25610 >Kek, the dumb kike unmasked himself so quickly when I chokeslammed him on his last post. When did this happen? I don't see any "chokeslamming". >That's the rubble of Dresden, a warcrime committed by the British government. It had literally nothing to do with Hitler No, that's objectively wrong. Hitler chose to invade Poland, triggering WW2. And don't give me any bullshit about "dey deserved dat clay". He chose violence; he chose war. Dresden is on him and was completely avoidable. >The entirety of the weimar government sold out to Jewish financiers and was letting German kids get prostituted and raped.\ Muh Weimar. Has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. NS Germany was still rife with corruption. >The Deutschmark was literally worth NOTHING in Weimar Germany Muh Weimar again. Do you have any arguments that you can actually make yourself? You consider an entire generation of youth being killed off in war as an improvement in quality of life? Or the rich being able to squeeze the shit out of small businesses because Hitler pandered to them? >Literally all testimony from the time period, both international From who? Britain thought the Germans were idiots because of Ribbentrop. Mussolini regularly talked shit about Hitler. Poland was in constant fear of them. >within Germany You mean propaganda? Why would the Nazis air any dissent about them? Did you forget they would put those people to death, including even youths? >You have to be willingly dishonest to imply the leap in fertility under Nazi Germany wasn't directly due to Nazi policy. Well, not really, since the rest of the West also had a babyboom not long after, so logically, we can deduce that there were other factors at work besides Hitler's policies. And to be clear, I'm not saying that they weren't good policies and didn't contribute. I'm saying they weren't the sole cause. I don't shit on everything he did, but it was all pointless because he killed a generation of youth with it. >Its called efficient mobilisation of the working age German population, who are some of the smartest and most efficient people Which is war, which has a steep cost. You're also accidentally conceding that Germany's population basically guaranteed success. Even when the USSR was extorting Eastern Germany and had them in their dysfunctional grasp, the DDR was still the most successful economy in the USSR. It wasn't so much Hitler as it was the German people. >Britain attacked Germany Because Germany attacked Poland, a British ally. That was Germany's fault. Britain didn't instigate the war, Hitler did and that is indisputable. If you want to keep worshipping a false idol, go ahead. Some of us actually want to make a difference.

>>25620 >Yes, it's because they've convinced themselves that it's a "moderate" position to hold Pretty much. It seems to be a natural law now that minor diversity always ends up snowballing into major diversity and I've seen no evidence to the contrary. Once you start giving out citizenship and making people equals, it all opens up, doesn't it? It's like imagine if you invited someone to your house, but instead of treating them like a guest, you gave them equal reign and let them start making decisions on the household. It's weird how people don't understand the correlation.

>>25656 glownigger glownigger time to get out your nigger stink can be smelt for miles

>>25656 >NS Germany was still rife with corruption. post proofs or you're a passive homosexual jew faggot

>>25666 These are lengthy articles, so I'll just do some quick hits of them: https://www.homin.ca/news.php/news/12712/group/27 > In their turn, German bureaucrats would embezzle in the same way the funds allocated for opening schools for the Volksdeutsch (ethnic Germans who resided outside the Reich). One of the documents on education in the Zhytomyr General District says that there are 122 Volksdeutsch schools in the district, but in reality this figure is at least twice as high as the real one (according to the occupiers’ press, there were about 60 of such institutions there). Taking into account the Nazis’ attempts to establish Volksdeutsch educational institutions, we can estimate that they allotted funds for 112 schools. The frauds could use real data on the number of children and teachers thanks to the statistical survey conducted in the region on Sept. 10, 1941, on the occupiers’ initiative. This campaign enabled them to obtain true data on the number of schools, pupils and teachers, and these figures were repeatedly used in financial machinations. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/315994?journalCode=jmh https://military- >Though scholars have paid little attention to Adolf Hitler's bribery of his senior military officers during WW2, the fact that large secret cash payments existed is not news. https://archive(Please use archive.today)/details/popularopinionpo0000kers_u3k5 >Weber became something of a hate figure in the city, particularly amongst the middle classes and he became a by-word for corruption as it was regularly questioned how this former hotel bellboy had come to own a number of hotels, villas, petrol stations, a brewery, the city's racecourse and bus service as well as a home in the Munich Residenz. https://www.archives.gov/iwg/research-papers/ohlendorf-irr-file.html >Ohlendorf's extensive comments concern details of known practices, including Hitler's gifts of landed estates to his favorites,4 the corrupt practices of Reich Labor leader Robert Ley,5 and the obscene dishonesty of Hermann Göring.6 The interrogation adds episodes on less well-known figures too. Ohlendorf claimed that Josef Spacil, the head of the RSHA Office in charge of administration, spent considerable efforts placing forged British banknotes into circulation for the purchase of black market items in southern Europe. Ohlendorf further explained that Germany's main auditing firm, the Deutsche Revisons - und Treuhandgesellschaft, which audited the largest German industrial concerns, was awash with corrupt practices. Instead of providing state authorities insight into the financial health of major firms, senior auditors, who were associated with other commercial firms, used inside information for personal profit. Ohlendorf mentioned that several Nazi party district leaders, particularly in annexed Poland, also helped themselves financially. Erich Koch, the Gauleiter of East Prussia, created a foundation in his own name of which he was sole member, manager, and director, and cemented his political position by showering senior officials such as Göring with lavish gifts. In May 1945, Koch fled to Flensburg aboard a ship "loaded with riches." Arthur Greiser, the Gauleiter of Posen, was associated "with shady dealings in gold articles which originated from the LODZ ghetto" and procured luxurious houses and a big country estate, according to Ohlendorf. I could honestly go on, but you get the picture. >>25671 >If you were alive back then you'd fucking LOVE the German Labor Front. Nope, I wouldn't: https://apwu(Please use archive.today)/news/magazine-labor-history/notorious-part-history-may-1933-dissolution-labor-unions-nazifascist >The Nazi Party’s paramilitary “storm troopers” (fascist armed thugs) stepped up attacks on union members and their offices in dozens of towns. The day after 1933’s May Day International Workers’ Day celebrations, real and free labor unions were outlawed throughout the country. >Police and “storm troopers” raided labor union offices across the country. Union funds were confiscated, and their organizations dissolved. The Nazis beat union officials, murdered many, and arrested many more. Leaders were imprisoned in concentration camps, including Dachau, which was specially built to imprison and murder trade unionists, members of the Communist Party (KPD), the Social Democratic Party (SPD) and other dissidents. >Collective bargaining and the right to strike were abolished, and pay and working conditions were set by Nazi officials. The DAF counted bosses within its membership and was primarily used to spread the Nazis’ antisemitic propaganda among workers. Wages were frozen and the work week increased by 20 percent in just a few years. >Nearly every single miserable communist in Germany was pleased & placated by the Labor Front. According to who, the NS party, right? >The only reason you don't like Nazi Germany's economics is because they didn't completely abolish private property No, and I'm not even for the total abolition of private property. In fact, they did the opposite of abolish it, they privatized even more, which was what inflated corruption and monopolization. >>25708 I'm neither a Communist or a Marxist. It's bizarre how if you point out how NS Germany murdered millions of White people and had corruption and incompetence, you get smeared as some sort of subversive element, rather than just noticing what actually happened.

>>25717 I'm just here for civil debate, brother. Just because we have differences doesn't mean there has to be bad blood.

>>25738 >Is there such a thing as "civil" debate on /pol/ of all places, or even the internet as a whole? Sometimes, when the stars align just so, there is. As a rule of thumb, though, I try to treat whoever I'm typing to as if I were speaking to their face. >your political/ideological alignment. White Nationalist with Strasserist and Mutualist leanings. I am a reluctant authoritarian, however and that extends into a bit of ecofascism, as well.

>>25738 >s there such a thing as "civil" debate on /pol/ of all places, or even the internet as a whole? In this /pol/ yes, there certainly is. Effortposting is encouraged here, as debates can go on for weeks or even months. Give it a shot.

>>25764 >Do you think Strasserist & Ersnt Röhm's political demands were reasonable Yes and no. I think whenever you're trying to accomplish things with other strong personalities, it's important to compromise. Strasserism always had a socialistic core at heart and imo, the ensuing corruption of NS Germany after Hitler's increasing privatization pretty much vindicated what they had been advocating for and arguing against. So, to that end, I think Hitler should've made more of an effort to meet them halfway and vice versa. Rohm is similar on that front, but I don't agree with his adamance about the primacy of the SA. The SA was extremely important and I'm of the perspective that Hitler wouldn't have gone anywhere without Rohm and the SA, so again, I think some placation is at hand, but obviously not the full plate. That said, I think Hitler was horrendous with managing interpersonal conflicts and that's why the biggest ass kissers in the party always went the farthest. As to Knives, though, that was disgusting and should never have happened under any circumstance. It runs completely opposite as to my own ethics and I would never support an organization or individual that was complicit in such an act. >video I'm well acquainted with Hitler. I'm not being closed-minded about the man, but I've done my research on him and after initially liking him as a misguided youth, I came to hate him on my own accord due to previously mentioned reasons and more. I would also like to add that if this thread slides from the catalog, I run a thread based around Strasserism and other alternative WN philosophies over here if anyone is interested in further debate or discussion (please excuse the troublemakers): https://zzzchan.xyz/pol/thread/4079.html#top

>>25410 Eveeyone is fucking stupid. The parasitic, disloyal, desperate, and subversive increasingly become a larger and larger share of the electorate. Worst of all, it simply takes financial groups throwing money around to mold that system to their activistic designs, especially through immigration to displace existing voting demographics, decreasing democratic effectiveness as a common man's tool over time. I don't know if blatant fascism (maybe if it was dressed up) is a workable solution in todays interconnected world where global interconnections matter, but everyone can see that democracy is currebtly no solution and to make some drastic changes, temporary or not.

>>25416 >It encourages short-term thinking (4 year terms), over long-term planning >>25440 >Not necessarily and not all Democracies have 4 year terms. Power being inherited by the ruler's children promotes long-term planning instead of 4-8 years (democracy) or lifetime of the ruler (fascism). By corruption/embezzlement, king robs his literal family.

I wish people would stop pretending that invading Poland was le evil. If you want to be a great power you’re going to end up kicking your neighbors’ doors down and taking their shit. The world is all spoken for so might makes right. Be on your nation’s team or fuck off.

>>25948 Gdańsk/Gduńsk is rightful Kashubian land no matter how many Germans live there, just like Amsterdam is Dutch land despite being only 40% Dutch.

>>25410 Democracy allows feminism and degeneracy to flourish. Not only that, any group with interests not aligned with the nation can take positions of power because of it. Getting weak and complacent like this is how we die from the inside.

>Solves the Birth Rates is killing young men in war really an improvement? >Solves the economy How, by plundering your neighbors? It solves it for some and ruins it for others >Solves morality It's *a* moral system but I wouldn't call it a good one >Makes the population happy or at least pretend to be, because they get thrown in jail if they complain

>>25416 True also democracy requires a minimum intelligence of the population

>>25466 >he blew it all on a pointless war kikes literally forced it on him as soon as they saw how much of a threat he was becoming to their profits

>>25394 >sends you to die in a meaningless war "for your country" One of the most cucked political systems.

Neo-fascism is just another pathetic aesthetic of the many being exploited to keep the system of corporate neo-feudalism afloat. It's all a scam. Fascism does not solve your capitalistic woes and it only consolidates power in the hands of the wealthy and decadent. Which is, as you're all well aware, synonym with "this shit's a gay as fuck jewish trick. The solution is to migrate responsible democracy (home ownership and vested economic interest/real IQ to vote) into a sort of anarchism (redistribution of wealth) for the benefit of the many, to watch Jews and niggers seethe. Remember, if someone's asking you to hand power over, they're telling you you're incompetent and shit's too fucked, only THEY can fix it: shalom.

If someone's trying to be a messiah, don't forget, that's their oldest trick!

>>25394 Every system promises all that. What makes fascism different? We had fascism before. Incompetent proles in elite positions used public resources for personal vanity projects, while the common workers suffered rationing of basic foods and textiles.

Etna sama....

>>25394 I understand wanting to start a coup and overthrow the government that seems masculine and exciting, but who is going to be king? fucking aspie elon? gross

>>25394 When you say fascism makes the population happy, whose happiness matters—and what makes a person matter in that system?

>>45316 >White men's happiness is what matters Okay. And do you think a "white person" is happy living under a system that will have them excluded, if not arrested, for not worshipping the state?

>>25394 Because its socialism and believing in it makes you no different from the woke niggers. You both tax your citizens to shit, claim to empower a race but because of your shit economics, You make them much poorer than a construction worker in the modern world. If you're gonna do fascism, better have it as a free market economy unless you wanna get raped by the allies again

>>25394 You wanna know why white man won't accept Fascism? Because white man is as stupid as niggers. Only about 10% of the white population is smart enough to think for themselves. The other 90% are literally white niggers. Will Pierce talked about the Lemmings a lot. >>25516 Britain and Russia started the war, you fucking lying faggot. Read "Churchhill's War" and "The Chief Culprit." Also, gas yourself, you fucking kike. >>25519 Jew >>25647 >In short im a nigger faggot npc Why do all jews want to be gassed so bad? >>25656 Everything you said is jewish lies. KYS kike. >>25666 >post proofs or you're a passive homosexual jew faggot Trips proves the jew is a faggot. >>25712 >These are lengthy articles, so I'll just do some quick hits of them: >posts kosher mainstream "news" sources. I legit though you were a jew. Turns out you're just a stupid white nigger. The fucking subhuman anglo-swine and slavic slavemen murdered millions of whites, you fucking nigger. >>25811 And you finally reveal yourself. A fucking Strasserist. Now everything makes sense. >I would never support an organization or individual that was complicit in executing traitors Those who tolerate or protect traitors are no different from traitors themselves. >>26368 I expected a Jap poster to be smarter than this. I'm just going to assume you're anglo. >>32914 Sure thing, Shekelberg. Marxism will work, we trust you, Shekelberg. >>45318 Fascism does not arrest people for not worshipping the state, you fucking lying communist. The only people who were arrested were literal communists. >>45319 Kill yourself you fucking libertarian piece of shit. You're literally a fucking white jew. You deserve to get raped by niggers. Capitalism is a jewish construct. Read some Henry Ford, nigger, and stop eating jewish ass. Ludwig von Mises and Ayn Rand are jewish propagandists. IMO The next night of the Long Knives must include Libertarians along with the Communists, for they are just as bad, if not, even more subversive. Also all white men must be tested for Jewish blood if even 1% of their blood is Jewish, they must be mandatorily sterilized and banned from all positions of social influence. Of course this will include almost the entirety of the Anglo-Saxon sub race, as well as the Slavic sub race. The anglos and the slobs Have Spent far too long interbreeding with Jews. They're complicity in Jewish subversion will end.

>>45325 >Fascism does not arrest people for not worshipping the state >The only people who were arrested were literal communists. How do you distinguish the two?

>>45333 Question: Does this book ever seek to address going after the people pushing for concepts like open borders, ethnic genocide, and everything else? Because it seems like it's a lot of talking about shit that people aready agree with. In which case, why even read it when, at worst, it's going to be preaching the same religion as the people who WANT open borders and white genocide, except the demiurge is "Non-whiteness" instead of "Whiteness"?

>>25516 >The British had even been trying to appease him kek. the shabbos gov and birthplace of globohomo was trying to coexist with a separate country nearby

>>45354 No, it's not, because the result is that anyone who reads it, who has ZERO experience with this shit, will become a raging Communist. Hell, the image even implies that "whiteness" does not necessarily correlate with "white people" as it directly says: <There really is no such thing as a generic white person. And one you declare that, it opens the door for the argument that it's possible for ANYONE to be or not to be a "white person". Which results in the exact situation we have now, where unironic niggers are "white nationalists" while 100% ethnically/genetically/genologically white people are seen as more representative of "Black people" than the blackest nigger gorilla you can find in the heart of Afrika.

>>25394 Fascism puts the party first with a nationalist facade instead of the hammer and sickle. Sure, state and corporations intermingling more than Lockheed and the State Dept is a *better* system than collectivism and bread lines, but USA in the early 70s was better. Nixon was the best president that we've had and it's a damn shame that the Jews got rid of him, do an Early Life check on everyone involved on getting him kicked out and check the context of the "smoking gun" tapes. Also, Evola makes good criticisms about fascism and fuck niggers and nigger worshippers, lol.

>>45358 >but USA in the early 70s was better. Just tell us you love niggers dude >inb4 the pic is from 1957

>>45358 >but USA in the early 70s was better. Nixon was the best president that we've had https://archive.today/https://infogalactic.com/info/Nixon_Shock <The Nixon shock was a series of economic measures undertaken by United States President Richard Nixon in 1971, in response to increasing inflation, the most significant of which were wage and price freezes, surcharges on imports, and the unilateral cancellation of the direct international convertibility of the United States dollar to gold. <While Nixon's actions did not formally abolish the existing Bretton Woods system of international financial exchange, the suspension of one of its key components effectively rendered the Bretton Woods system inoperative. While Nixon publicly stated his intention to resume direct convertibility of the dollar after reforms to the Bretton Woods system had been implemented, all attempts at reform proved unsuccessful. By 1973, the Bretton Woods system was replaced de facto by the current regime based on freely floating fiat currencies. <... <The Nixon Shock has been widely considered to be a political success, but an economic mixed bag in bringing on the stagflation of the 1970s and leading to the instability of floating currencies. The dollar plunged by a third during the 1970s. According to the World Trade Review's report "The Nixon Shock After Forty Years: The Import Surcharge Revisited", Douglas Irwin reports that for several months, U.S officials could not get other countries to agree to a formal revaluation of their currencies. The German Mark appreciated significantly after it was allowed to float in May 1971. Further, the Nixon Shock unleashed enormous speculation against the dollar. It forced Japan's central bank to intervene significantly in the foreign exchange market to prevent the yen from increasing in value. Within two days August 16–17, 1971, Japan's central bank had to buy $1.3 billion to support the dollar and keep the yen at the old rate of ¥360 to the dollar. Japan's foreign exchange reserves rapidly increased: $2.7 billion (30%) a week later and $4 billion the following week. Still, this large-scale intervention by Japan's central bank could not prevent the depreciation of US dollar against the yen. France also was willing to allow the dollar to depreciate against the franc, but not allow the franc to appreciate against gold (Page 14 Douglas). Even much later, in 2011, Paul Volcker expressed regret over the abandonment of Bretton Woods: "Nobody's in charge," Volcker said. "The Europeans couldn't live with the uncertainty and made their own currency and now that's in trouble." <In 1996, economist Paul Krugman (Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, 2008) summarized the post-Nixon Shock era as follows: >The current world monetary system assigns no special role to gold; indeed, the Federal Reserve is not obliged to tie the dollar to anything. It can print as much or as little money as it deems appropriate. There are powerful advantages to such an unconstrained system. Above all, the Fed is free to respond to actual or threatened recessions by pumping in money. To take only one example, that flexibility is the reason the stock market crash of 1987—which started out every bit as frightening as that of 1929—did not cause a slump in the real economy. While a freely floating national money has advantages, however, it also has risks. For one thing, it can create uncertainties for international traders and investors. Over the past five years, the dollar has been worth as much as 120 yen and as little as 80. The costs of this volatility are hard to measure (partly because sophisticated financial markets allow businesses to hedge much of that risk), but they must be significant. Furthermore, a system that leaves monetary managers free to do good also leaves them free to be irresponsible—and, in some countries, they have been quick to take the opportunity. Yeah, Dick, thanks a fucking lot!

>>25416 What country imports outside labour over civil labour because who would do that but you what groups do that.. corporation for cheap labour and for your military force under a fascism would be more foreigners then a democracy and stability fascism is highly unstable form of governance because fascism needs a group to hate to control prower unlike democracy which they work by popular opinion so they don't need hate to keep prower

>>45360 The early 70s was a time where the whites enjoyed life in Small Town America and suburbia. The niggers seethed in their new city dwellings with poor whites that got fed up with niggotry really quick. Black Panthers got the knee on the neck and the negroes stayed separate from whites for the most part. Not until the late 70s with the advent of Disco did you have more nigger integration(limited). Obama destroyed this nation with unlimited Section 8 housing, putting niggers everywhere. Anyways, fascism seems cool but it's really gay because the state and the corporations are spitroasting you, but it's still a lot better than communism(there's never been a fascist famine).

>>25394 >fascism

>>45486 >White Unity great idea!

>>45486 based

facism doesn't work because humans are inherently evil. explain to me how having one 1984 style ruler would be a positive thing at all for any country? there are books about this retard

>>45781 False, only niggers and jews are inherently evil. If humans were inherently evil in general civilization wouldn't be possible in the first place. >there are books about this Being written in a book doesn't make something true.

>>45472 but wait there is moar

>>25440 >Here are obvious negatives of not having a democracy: >>No free speech >implying that letting communists, groomers and school trannies roam and speak freely is a good thing >>Rampant abuse of power and nepotism >implying that democracy is free of these things and is more just than traditional power schemes >>25454 >finds a few examples of monarchies that failed their people (still could be argued but let's give him that) >can't point out one recent democracy that hasn't been entirely eaten inside out by Jews or a typical Jewish materialist mindset

>>45781 >1984 is fascism!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The state of.

>>45365 >libertarian warm take >>45367 I love blatant invasions when I see them and this is one of them. > corporation for cheap labour and for your military force under a fascism would be more foreigners then a democracy Literally the opposite of reality. You're psychotic. > fascism is highly unstable form of governance because fascism needs a group to hate to control prower unlike democracy which they work by popular opinion so they don't need hate to keep prower lol The democratic USA have certainly not hated fascists, communists and muslims. You hate the people you need to hate. Period. Fascism does not need to hate, but it will hate those who directly destroy a nation's health. IOW, go back to Reddit.