There's some stuff in the global rules that is unclear, contradictory, and outright antithetical to the ideals of the site, even upon further research in the 8chan Rules Enforcement and Corner Case Rulings Compendium. Acid has finally expounded upon these previously unwritten rules, clarifications, and unimplemented corrections to the global rules. I am posting them here for reference since they will eventually fall off the /v/ meta thread, including those are already clear but Acid included anyways. Acid did not capcode under this ID, just avatarfagged with Asooka, so anyone is free to claim these rules are fake and gay. https://archive.is/0QIT7#selection-52961.0-52961.6 >>>/v/524289 >If you're a pedo and you want to talk about your problems with it, take it to /b/ >If you want to talk about or advocate pedo shit in general, take it to /b/ >If you're talking about something else, and pedoshit ties into it somehow but isn't really the focus then its up to the board mods to decide if its on topic like usual >It doesn't matter what the edited text of a legal 2D image says, whoever uploaded it agreed that all fictional characters in it are 18+ anyway >If you cause problems or drama by trying to claim that legal 2D loli is pedophilia then the mods are free to do whatever they want about it, including nothing >No kid pics on porn boards except innocent memes >SFW kid pics okay on non-porn boards including /b/ >No lewding kid pics on /b/ or anywhere else The first three points are very useful clarification on the newly established, "no pedophilia discussion outside of /b/ rule". Refer to Ruling 10 for more information. >>4721 The fourth point is an irrelevant repetition of a global "rule" that isn't actually a rule, but a disclaimer of questionable value. The fifth point corrects that it is not actually globally banned to conflate legal, fictional 2D or 3DCG artwork with pedophilia, resolving the contradiction that 2D that is explicitly allowed could itself conflate these subjects. This one is doubly important as the undoing of this unenforced-since-day-1 global rule returns the global rules back to a more free speech friendly state in which no opinion is globally banned. The last three points, I believe, were already understood through both the global rules and Corner Case Rulings, but Acid was dealing with pedos and felt the need to reiterate these points which the pedos repeatedly choose to ignore. Things would be a lot simpler if he just put this information clearly and explicitly in the global rules, and the more nuanced edge cases in the Corner Case Rulings, but for whatever reason, he does not. He has even been directly confronted by different people at different times over the course of months about that one global rule banning a wrongthink opinion, but refuses to change it despite it not being enforced whatsoever. I just don't understand why he can't make this simple. Whoops, posted this in the wrong tab.