>>95924 >In that context, they still want "the idea" of a rape, they just want it within their own terms. You know what it's called when someone "rapes" you on your own terms with your permission? Consensual sex, AKA literally not rape. There's a huge subset of people who masturbate to anime characters but are put off by real people, 3DPD (3D pig disgusting) as it's called. Lolicon is a subset of the anime fandom so obviously this same sentiment is mirrored by it. >How does that work with illustrations of a little kid getting fucked that doesn't involve "still wanting the idea of a little kid getting fucked"? The 5000 year old dragon in a kids body idea? Because it's not a kid, it's a drawing. It does not have a kid's body, it's a drawing. Lolicons are attracted to drawings that cannot even accidentally be mistaken for the real thing, and many of them are disgusted by the real thing. In my view it's no different than someone who's attracted to furry characters, giantess vore, or big tits hyper-muscle girls, all of them being unrealistic or fictional body-types/creatures. Mind you, I'm not defending any of it. This is just the conclusion I've come to as an oldfag who's spent a lot of time on the internet. You don't have to like lolicon, you can even hate it, but it's in your best interest to at least tolerate it existing on a porn imageboard in threads that you don't go into, if you want to have a place on the internet where you can find drawings of porn, especially niche stuff like tickle porn.

>>95927 >Because it's not a kid, it's a drawing. It does not have a kid's body, it's a drawing. A drawing of what. It's just random scribbles? It's all abstract nonsense anyone can project whatever they want to on it like a Rorschach test? What is the drawing an objective image depicting?

Regardless of your opinion on the subject, this fed shit will not stop until this board gets rid of loli stuff. Right now they know they can fish a few pedos with that because of the kind of content that is posted here

>>95930 Yes it's subjective. Some are obviously intended to depict children while others are not. It varies case by case. The problem is that many people will call literally any anime character a child or underage because that difference is also subjective when it comes to anime-style drawings of characters. The vast majority of it is completely ambiguous. >>95931 Fedposting will not stop until you put the feds in jail for possession and distribution of CP. Just delete any posts with CP and/or links advertising it, along with any realistic AI art of CP, and ban the poster permanently.

>>95931 What's stopping the shotacons from taking over?

>>95930 They really do love to dance around the fact of the matter of what the drawing is specifically of. "It's a drawing" is such a vague twitter tier talking point.

>>95900 this is the correct opinion, you can't bring antis to the right side, and why would you want to? just let them stay seething in their pigsty while the sophisticated people draw and write about what they enjoy

>>95931 it literally just needs to be removed faster, but the moderator of this board never ever seems to intend on recruiting

>>95908 >That's what most reasonable people assume. Ah, so most "reasonable" people assume that enjoying killing people in GTA means you enjoy killing people and it's not just something you pulled out of Uranus at all. Got it. >>95930 >>95935 A drawing of something that doesn't exist and doesn't even remotely resemble nor act like what irl humans do except in the most exaggerated, abstract sense for comedic, sexual, emotional, or whatever else purposes. This sad gotcha attempt has never worked, it's nothing new. You're essentially saying "it's just pixels" is not an excuse to enjoying killing people in GTA because they're pixels forming a (much more realistic) human.

>>95942 just give up. you are right but there is literally no reason to try arguing with them on any sort of moral basis, they're faggot bullies who in their eyes are on a righteous crusade against "pedos," they will only mock you for defending it. just wait for their demands to censor the board to surface and shut them down as they come

>>95943 True. Mainly just wanted to get the main point out. Otherwise either mocking or ignoring them is usually the way. Or even better, respond to them by posting more loli.

Will you stupid dumb fucks take your moral dilemma's to your therapists? I care more about actual abuse than your petty circle jerk of nonexistent crisis.

>>95942 >A drawing of something that doesn't exist and doesn't even remotely resemble nor act like what irl humans do Holy fuck lmfao

>>95908 >Cannot articulate why a lolicon automatically wants to fuck irl kids even though they only jack off to anime lolis and not irl kids >Just repeats the original non-sequitur several more times Ah, a member of the "but I had breakfast" demographic

>>95950 >>Cannot articulate why a lolicon automatically wants to fuck irl kids even though they only jack off to anime lolis and not irl kids we did articulate it, though. they've been asked repeatedly what images of lolicon depict. They responded with "a thing that isn't real, ok?!" which is a shit answer. You spewing shit you saw on /pol/ doesn't make you not a pedo.

>>95950 >Just repeats the original non-sequitur several more times >Ah, a member of the "but I had breakfast" demographic When you see someone doing that, don't assume that they're stupid because they're probably just trolling you, especially if they're asking the same questions over and over while ignoring answers. Even if they're not trolling you but actually are that stupid, you will never convince a stupid person with a good arguments, so you're better off assuming they're trolling either way. If you get some satisfaction from responding to this person, more power to you but for me personally, I'll quitting while I'm ahead. I got my thoughts on the matter out as best as I could phrase it si reasonable people can look at it and draw their own conclusions. That's a win in my book.

>>95950 I never said that you automatically want to fuck irl kids. I said that if you jack off to loli you should expect most other people to think you're a pedophile. You speak about fiction and reality and that's how video games, books, and movies work, but porn is reflective of your real life sexual preferences. If you get off to drawings that at there core are supposed to resemble children then I assume you do the same to real children. Is everyone who gets off to loli a pedophile? Maybe they are, maybe they aren't. But when Loli is defined to be resembling a child and when the people who love loli cite the child like qualities of it as there favorite then yes I assume you are a pedophile. My big issue is that the cunny defense force can't comprehend why people think they're pedophiles. Instead of trying to reasonably explain why they aren't or just accepting that's gonna be what the general public thinks of them, they act like reddit atheists trying to le epic own there opposition by acting obtuse. If you're gonna be a faggot then go back to bluesky with all the other child loving trannies. I'm not gonna advocate for the removal of loli cause having it here is not that big of a deal + like the other guy said "Keeps the rent low". But I wish lolicons would stay in there lane, post whatever shit they're always gonna post, and keep there mouths shut. I don't hate loli, I just really hate lolicons, they always shit up everything. >>95952 You're the only one who's actually made decent, fair points cause you're actually explaining things. If lolicons acted like you instead of using false equivalences and going checkmate without saying anything of consequences, then I don't think they'd be hated as much. I think I've said everything I have to on this. It's not like anyone's mind is gonna be changed.

>>95948 As I expected, no response because I knew exactly how to point out the BS of your gotcha attempt, so instead you just cry that it's a "bad answer" with no actual substantial response, just projection. >>95953 Speaking of... Holy Projection Batman! Y'all really love to assume most people agree with you when most people can actually distinguish fiction from reality whether or not they find said fiction weird or gross. It's always those that conflate the 2 that end up being guilty of actual disgusting acts. Hence the "Reset the clock" meme. I'll also just rephrase one of your points back to you to show the absurdity and baselessness. "Video game violence is reflective of your violent tendencies and desires." I swear, modern inductive psychology has truely ruin people's ability to think critically and reason, instead going off pure intuitional assumptions and conflating it with absolute truth.

>>95953 >My definition of pedophile includes people who very obviously aren't attracted to real children, and would instead approach their fantasies through roleplay with a consenting adult (if at all) So you believe there's nothing inherently wrong with being a pedophile? What do we call people who do present an actual danger to children then?

>>95982 >As I expected, no response >BS of your gotcha attempt You understand it's a "gotcha" because there is an objective correct answer to the question. The images in question form a depiction of something. "It's of a thing that isn't real" is not an answer. What did you just post pictures of just now? You can't describe them? You opened the uploader and grabbed some shit off your hard drive at complete random, you don't know, could be Digimon for all you know because all images look the same because they're exactly that? You understand the answer and think if you just pretend like you don't, you're not objectively a childlover. Screaming "Jack Thompson!" and "This is just like mah vidya!" isn't a response, because even in that scenario, you're too stupid to understand you're still akcnowledging videogame violence as violence. In your ingenious response to my bullshit gotcha, you inadvertently recognize artwork of childporn is STILL sexualized imagery of children, "but it's ok because it's not like I'd ever actually vote Dems...". But you're still sexually attracted to imagery of children and are too stupid to realize your dumbass videogame comparison is you effectively admitting as much.

>>95997 It's imagery of humanoid creatures with features resembling cat faces.

>>95951 Alright, 3rd or 4th "but I had breakfast" moment in this thread. Let me try to dumb it down to twitter leftist levels for you. 1. PORNOGRAPHY INVOLVING REAL CHILDREN EXISTS 2. THE MAJORITY OF "LOLICONS" DO NOT ATTEMPT TO SEEK OUT THIS MATERIAL OR EXPRESS DESIRE TO PARTAKE IT IN If these statements are true: Why do you believe enjoying lolicon content inherently makes one want to harm real children, even when most of them exhibit behaviors directly in contradiction to this goal?

Was more cp being posted or are you guys arguing over lolislop still?

>>96006 >3rd or 4th "but I had breakfast" moment You have no fucking idea what that means. I understand you think just pivoting to "le niggers, LE DUMB!" shit over and over again is going to make it look like you "belong here" but refusing to acknowledge the reality of the images being intentionally drawn to resemble children undercuts the act. >HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I HAVE TO EXPLAIN IT'S NOT ACTUALLY A CHILD THOUGH?! How many times are you going to deny the fact that you find it arousing is specifically because someone picked up a pencil and draw a characters that intentionally resembled human children for the purpose of sexual arousal. I look forward to seeing what /pol/ meme you pick next.

>>96010 So call the police then? I'm sure they care about this as much as you do. XD

>>95997 There is an answer and I gave it. You're just mad that I didn't indulge in your delusions of seeing sexualized kids in everything. Lolis not only don't resemble real people, but they're often even adults within said fiction. So you'd still be wrong either way. Also nice non-sequitur that is little more than being pissed that I posted those just to spite you, and it worked lol. Then of course yet again more projection by giving no response of any substance and just repeating "It's literally children guys!" while claiming my answers somehow weren't responses when they call back to the same arguments that have destroyed your mystical alternate reality again and again. You're just mad that you have no way to respond without blind assertions since my arguments were actually grounded and used proper analogy rather than your false equivalence. You really should get some mental help if you look at over-exaggerated cartoons and see children. It's not healthy and we've seen from the "reset the clock" meme exactly where you're kind end up.

>>96010 >pulls muh racism card even though race never even remotely came up once in this thread LMAO wtf? So did the hacker 4chan hack into your webcam to determine whether or not you were black before he called you a retard? Yeah I think we have a genuine case of sub-70 IQ here.

>>96010 >I look forward to seeing what /pol/ meme you pick next. I look forward to seeing what twitter meme you pick next.

>>95898 More like "if you obsessively play Hatred, think it's high art, empathize with the protag, dress like him, quote him constantly and make custom maps of your own school then yeah you're probably sus"

>>96068 >pulls muh racism card even though race never even remotely came up once in this thread maybe google "but I had breakfast" to understand what he is talking about. He even put through the effort to put it in quotations that would have tipped off someone who WASN'T retarded that it was a reference to something. >>96019 >ecsdee childfucker confirmed

>>96205 >Look, everyone, he blanked on a shitty meme, must be raping kids in his basement! Nah, but fr you're the one white-knighting cartoon lollies harder than a reddit mod. Classic troon cope desperately wishing chad would let you facesit him with your inverted axe wound.

>>96205 You got proof of that? You know, the same thing the police would ask?

>>96205 Ok I googled it, and yeah, seeing how you were basically unable to understand a simple question that involves abstraction, the meme 100% applies to you. Might be a long shot but are you at least smart enough to articulate how it's racist? I hope that's not too hard for you at least.

>>96205 I say this with all disrespect: u mad?

>>96292 >Hey you know what would really make the guy calling all lolicons closet pedos mad? Proving him right hur hur. I am big brain