>>58984 I am the artist of said kitty you may keep it

>>58895 Sonic logic. They're made of cartoon ink so their fur and flesh is basically just the one thing I agree it's dumb especially when they canonically have feetpaws

I have no idea if this is an unpopular opinion or not, but I definitely prefer clothed lees over naked ones in most situations. A barefoot but otherwise clothed girl is often more attractive to me than a nude one. That goes double for lady knights. All that protective armor, but it's not protecting your most sensitive point. It's almost like bonus humiliation in a way.

I'd suppose this opinion seems non-controversial but also fairly unpopular based off what is normally represented in art, but I'd wish there was more art of slightly older ticklees, like in the ranges of mid twenties to mid fourties.

I hate tickle tools. I hate brushes, I hate toothbrushes, I hate flossers. Idk I find the use of tools pretty hacky.

>>65181 Nah I 100% agree with you. Things like clothing, socks, and nylons are ridiculously hot. Because it's added layers that you can take off whenever you please. So to start out with that is great, because nobody"adds" it back on once it's gone.

Males ruin every pic/video they're in, regardless of being a ler or a lee. Unless I'm the guy doing the tickling or being tickled, I really don't give a shit and would rather have F/F instead.

>>65204 Jfc it's always some pasty, scrotum faced, balding ugly POS. It can't ever just be the model who's the center of attention. Some ugly MF always has to ruin the shot, it's disgusting.

>>65204 For the most part I agree, especially fuckheads like the Tickle Horror guy who even when just running the camera ruins things by never shutting the fuck up with that creepy ass voice of his. But also you sound like the crotchety boomers on TMF who would complain that their breakfast was ruined because someone posted a pic or clip and didn't warn that there was a guy visible.

>>65492 what are ya? Gay?

>>65492 Not really, I just ignore it and move on, but since this is the thread where I'm supposed to talk about that kind of stuff, I figured I should.

I'm giving my two cents here: I think that this fetish derailed in a way too extreme way. What I mean is that the "tickling fetish" has become "extreme" for the pure boredom that people seem to have for it. To give an example: I understand that tickling may connect to some other fetishes, however I'm kinda sad to see that now basically everyone seems to go full hard on anything related to it. You want some tickling? You totally can, but you have to have it in the most cruel and dehumanized way possible: every character, no matter for the gender, must be somehow either suffering through it or be objectified in some sort of way. I'm not getting into some of the fetishes that have been added to this one, not my circus not my monkey, yet what annoys me most is the lack of...idk, empathy? Humanity? It's kinda difficult to explain. Anyway, these were my two cents about the unpopular opinion thread.

>>65516 you sound like a wuss this fetish is still full of softcore ticklefluff if thats all you desire, check out tumblr.

>>65516 I mean if your unpopular opinion is that lighthearted, gentle tickling is your thing, then yeah that's an unpopular take. Not entirely unrepresented, but the vast majority of tickle fetishists want to see more visceral reactions. Mostly, at least for me, I want to see it be overwhelming and genuinely ticklish, and it's not satisfying for a woman to just giggle a bit and that's it. I want them to be unable to help themselves from laughing and pulling away. I think the "suffering" debate got misconstrued in the past, because it sounds like it's genuine painful torture when you use the word suffering, but at the end of the day, it's tickling. And it's almost entirely fictional. Whether it be video, art or literature, nearly all tickle fetish content is made up. I'd get what you mean if every motherfucker here wanted to see women in the most obscene bondage imaginable, in a sensory depravation chamber tickling until kingdom come, but that's not everyone. There are two extremes, but I think the median is genuinely ticklish reactions that have the lee wanting to get away, as the nature of tickling is for it to be unnerving for the one getting tickled. If she's able to be tickled but just laugh it off and not try to get away from it, she's not really that ticklish, which is a let down. If your angle is that you like when the lee enjoys it, while also unpopular, I can see why you find adversity in the way tickling is normally shown, but again I think that goes back to what tickling is as a whole. The only people that "enjoy" getting tickled are the lees with a tickle fetish.

>>65492 Honestly the reason I don't like males in my art/video/story is because a male ler is always extremely self indulgent. It feels more like I'm watching some dudes fantasy, which I am, rather than just enjoying a woman getting tickled. Especially as someone who enjoys reading tickling lit, when it's a male ler it's always the same old "I kidnapped this woman, threw her in stock and tickled her feet. Yippee!" rather than an interesting plot or story. That said, in terms of videos, I can't pretend I'd be any different if I was hiring attractive women to film and tickle, of course those dudes are trying to get their moneys worth.

>>65521 Maybe that's because It's porn, anon. you're looking at porn. if you want more softcore 'highbrow' erotica you're gonna have to either look harder or make it yourself. Like you'd have to in any fetish or sexuality. c'est la vie.

Not enough M/F art with attractive lers instead of ugly bastards, bland self inserts, or femboys. I know m/f is 99.9% for straight dudes, but that 0.01% of girls is STARVING for actual hot lers to go with it lmao

>>65530 Why would we want women to chase the 0.1% They do that already.

>>65516 Pretty much hit the nail on the head; I was trying to figure out how to comment something similar lol. I hadn't considered "dehumanized" a word to describe what I see in contemporary tickle media, but now that you mention it, it really seems to fit. I can't stand any of that freaky sado-masochism stuff, least of all when it's in my fetish. So much of what seems to populate tickling content recently comes off as abusive or cruel, which are, at best, turn offs and, at worst, disturbing. Tickling's sexy to me because it's a fun thing to do with the person you love: making them laugh, beg, and squirm, or overwhelming them with panic for a while. I guess you can construe that as a "dom and sub" relationship, but only with very light definitions of such terms.

>>65531 I specified in art for a reason - obviously male lers in videos aren't gonna get any better ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

>>65181 I have, in fact, expressed a similar opinion in the past: >>15098 Based on the general reaction at the time, it did seem like it was an unpopular opinion, as a matter of fact. Still, it's nice to find a couple like-minded anons on the board. >That goes double for lady knights. All that protective armor, but it's not protecting your most sensitive point. You get it, anon. You get it.

Here's my unpopular opinion Unrestrained Lees(tm) are much better to tickle rather than having them tied down with a bunch of tools Just me, my lee and my hands

>>65531 >Why would we want women to chase the 0.1% >They do that already.

>>65862 Seethe more. Those faces are funny to me :)

time to face facts and come out of the closet if this turns you on. sorry not sorry, deny it all you want

>>65868 ...girls is girls. You aren't making me doubt, only expanding my buffet :)

>>65869 >girls is girls instant cope. if the face was covered, your penis wouldn't know the difference

>>65870 Me when I see breasts: mmm yummy men I'm so GAY for VEINY PENISES

>>65874 hey man, you said it, not me

>>65870 Do you think i'm blind or something? Or do you just don't believe women can work out?

>>65868 I only agree with the first two since they look like transwomen (if they aren't) but that last girl I would absolutely kill to tickle her pits and tummy.

>>65851 As a lee i would prefer this too

>>65895 I think of it this way. Lers are just as if not more ticklish than their bound, helpless, tied up lees. A single stroke, a single gentle touch, a tickly poke, a tingly caress even is enough to bring them down. They know that any sort of retaliation from the lees would end in their own tickly doom. Lers do not tie or trap their victims because just because they are sadistic. That is just a small part of it. In truth, they fear the tickles more than the Lees. They would crumble down to a giggling mess whenever their Lees tickle back. A well tied up and bondaged Lee is the only way they'd feel safe. This setup allows them to be completely sadistic as their victims would be unable to fight back. It is their solace against the ticklish Lees, an illusion of false safety . Thank you for coming to my Ted Talk.

>>65911 Fuuuck me... I want to my woman to make me a mess like that

>>65889 Based Leanbeefpatty enjoyer. I'd tie her up so all her muscles are useless, then tickle her sculpted abs and thighs all night long and lick her broad, smooth, delicious pits until she can't breathe anymore