>>94662 >facilitate suggestions for what threads you'd like to see wouldn't they just make the thread? What's the purpose of pitching the idea of a thread on an imageboard? Just make the thread

>>94664 Primarily to see demand before clogging up the board. For example if you thought this idea was stupid, If I had posted this thread idea in a thread like this beforehand and everyone said the same thing then I would've never made the thread. And then anyone who has the same stupid idea could look to see it was suggested and shot down so it doesn't happen again. People are also more likely to make new threads if they know its an idea people like. It could also be workshopped a bit before being posted, which would avoid situations where we have like 5 separate hyper-specific threads before someone makes a single all encompassing general one. This also isn't just for thread suggestions but ideas for the board and in general. So if someone wanted to make a discord, they can be told that has failed several times. If someone wanted to try and archive all lost tickle content, they can figure out the logistics. So on so forth.

>>94668 look I don't want to look like I'm just fucking with you, but it's obvious at this point that despite the near non-stop /pol/ shit that's been posted recently that the vast majority of you genuinely don't understand how imageboards work. Honestly I think a lot of you would be better off just creating a messageboard somewhere.

>>94669 Well maybe this wouldn't have happened if someone made this thread earlier

>>94662 What a pointless suggestion. You can literally make any thread at any time and clog it up. Why do people like you exist as if you're trying to be fucking playground monitors?

>>94676 This is exactly why we need this thread

>>94662 I respect the effort OP, but if all the shitflinging and spam of new threads for topics that already exist, let alone topics no one really wants to see, are anything to go by, it's evident that this is broadly not a group of considerate people here. Your efforts toward a semblance of order rely on others actually playing along, and very few here seem capable and/or willing to do so.

>>94677 And why you should go back to reddit's hugbox.

>>94676 OP can only dream of being a playground monitor. So many children running around, so little time because recess is only 30 min and his parole officer comes back in 20.

See all the backlash is exactly why we need this thread. Imagine if instead of having to do this song and dance every new thread, we can just localize it all here and prevent stupid ideas like this one. Now lets get some ideas rolling.

>>94695 One I'm surprised isn't a major thread is kemonomimis (catgirls, foxgirls, doggirls, etc and/or male equivalents or subsets like those plus loli/shota) or even threads of one of those specifically. Closest are furry threads and the monstergirl thread (which specifies that kemonomimi types don't count for that thread).

>>94696 Kemonomimi thread has a lot of potential I'm all for it.

>>94703 There we go. lol >>94718

Here’s an idea, how about a /tkr/ original art archive thread? A good handful of artists have posted stuff here that don’t get posted anywhere else which is awesome and all, but that leaves the issue of it all being scattered in a billion fucking threads so it gets tedious when you’re looking for something specific. Putting it all in one place makes sense right?

>>94744 That's a need. So much art has been lost to the ravages of time, definitely make that thread.

>>94745 Done >>94747

>>94695 Based. I have no idea what the point of all those replies are, you nailed it on the head. Anyways in terms of suggestions I don't have any, but I'd like to see more of all kinds, even if they're for topics already made to revitalize them.

Permanent IP bans for anyone just coming here to piss and moan about loli.

Same with non-tickling feet posts. We don't need to see other people's autistic fetish obsession when it's not the purpose of this board.

>>94773 > Ban anyone who dislikes our fictional child rape!

>>94776 Yes. Starting with you. Faggot.

>>94774 You can't be serious. I'd rather have 100 non-tickling pics posted a day than one of that faggot.

>>94774 We should start with the faggot who bitches and whines about every anticipation pic for being "not tickling." Ironically the only images he's ever uploaded here are reaction pics pulled straight from the low functioning autism side of DeviantArt.

>>94773 >>94774 Agree wholeheartedly with both I dislike loli but it's very obvious it's not going anywhere. Anyone complaining about it can not handle the website as a whole and is only here to derail threads, even the ones that have little to do with loli otherwise. That said in this same regard I find it obnoxious when lolicons go off about how great it is in other non-related threads, and it should be treated in the same regard. We only need non-tickling hot content and a feet only equivalent (Too many foot fags for them to get roped in with the rest). Nothing outside those 2 threads to contain all that, I'm fine with looking at hot bodies that are ripe to tickle but when it starts going into smell threads or several separate non-tickling threads then that's ridiculous. Unfortunately we'd need more jannies to enforce these and 1. I don't know how feasible it is and 2. i don't know if the cons of jannies outweigh the pros.

>>94827 >I find it obnoxious when lolicons go off about how great it is in other non-related threads The theory I and another anon have is that 1 multiple personality schizo is pretending to be both pro-loli, being obnoxious and saying absolutely disgusting things, and also an anti-loli. Why? Presumably to make loli look worse. Hopefully, they continue to be banned on sight. >Nothing outside those 2 threads to contain all that The anticipation thread is 100% relevant and fulfills a purpose of its own, if the images are made to imply that tickling will occur, but don't have variants where it happens. Just leave footfags alone, like how we have to leave furry and autistic lolcow threads alone if we don't like them.

>>94833 Anticipation absolutely has its place here. I'm fine with footfags having one thread to look at hot pictures of feet but any more then one is stupid. It's a tickling board so even if feet is a major part of that. As soon as we have multiple threads about feet with nothing to do with tickling then that's retarded.

>>94836 Ah, alright. It's just the notion to IP ban footfags, as if they're on the same level of malice as THE schizo, is ridiculous.

>>94833 You and the other anon are right, and it's 1000% some transfag activist. How many times do I have to say this? Do I need to get the "board's approval" or whatever the point of this thread is to collate all the proof and dumb it down into greentext and soyjacks so you all understand? If you're not sure, just look at how the shota thread is totally free of drama. Maybe one pussy was in there bitching about 2D cocklets, but that's about it.

>>94836 Or or or or, hear me out, we let people do whatever the fuck they want and those who don't like it can fuck off back to Reddit.

>>94841 If you let people do whatever the fuck they want then they'll do everything but what the boards meant for. If you have an idea for a foot-only thread you're free to make it, no one can stop you. But if you run it by here first you can get told ahead of time that its a retarded idea and either stop it in its tracks, or it can be workshopped into a thread that'll actually yield content. I don't think any thread that's foot-only, no tickling, has its place here outside of one general one to contain all that. But if you have an idea go ahead.

>>94845 I mean it just sounds to me like you want something that can never exist here without fundamentally changing the site into something else. I'm not much into feet but all bitching about noise does is add more noise. It's like with the shemale and his one-man crusade against loli. All the retards taking his bait instead of ignoring it are only contributing to the problem. I'd ban them as fast as I would the shemale honestly. Idk, maybe I'm old school, but it really feels like few of you understand how this style of board works and why it exists.

I wonder if other boards have this problem. Like if a lactation fetish board exists, do you think they have their own schizo who screams and has a meltdown every time someone posts a pic of boobs that aren't currently squirting milk out of them?

I don't really see what the big deal is. Nobody's stopping anyone from making threads. This is just a buffer to see if the thread is gonna be universally disliked/unnecessary or if it could be improved upon. The way this style of board works and why it exists is that people are here to jack off to as much tickling as possible. So if there's ways to maximize the tickling to jack off too then why not? >>94854 If a bunch of morons kept on making boob threads on a board that is not about boobs then obviously they would and are completely justified in being so. This is a tickling board, we are not here to get off to feet, we are here to get off to feet being tickled. Same with bellies, armpits, thighs, boobs, and more. One thread for exclusively feet is fine enough and I think the rest can all be grouped into the non-tickling hot thread. I think aside from those, we do not need any other threads not related to tickling at all. Around here: Tickling is not an accessory to feet, feet are an accessory to tickling. If you want feet then go to a feet site. This is a board for tickling so anything without tickling really has no place here. I'm fine with the two containment threads but I feel it's stupid to try and justify any more then that because at that point it's straight up another fetish. People are free to do whatever they want here, I just think if it's not related to the purpose of the board then it's retarded.

>>94860 >lactation >not about boobs There you go guys, he self-reported as a troon. Now we can stop pretending his opinion matters.

I do not like the post IDs it creates a non-zero chance that someone else using my wi-fi could come here and see what posts I've made

>>94909 First, not the right thread for this. This is general territory. Second, vpn buddy.

>>94904 I'm saying that just boobs alone is not lactation. I'm sure in a lactation board you can have a thread or two that is just "Hot boobs I wanna see lactating" but at a certain point it stops being a lactation fetish board and becomes a boob fetish board (AKA normal porn site) if all the threads are just hot boobs. Also feet aren't as tied to tickling as boobs are to lactation. Only boobs can lactate, feet aren't the only thing that's ticklish. I'm not saying we don't need feet focused threads, I'm just saying all threads on the board except some select isolation threads should be related to tickling. Even if all the threads were feet only and belly/pit fags got kicked to the curb it'd still make sense if all the threads had tickling in it. Most of us are here to satisfy a tickle fetish, not a feet or belly or whatever kink. If you're primarily in it for just feet and tickling satisfies that then that's great but when you bring non tickling stuff in (Like feet in other fetish scenarios) then it goes against the point of the board. Not like its a massive issue, it's happened a couple of times but everyone who's tried gets BTFO'd. I just think the concept is completely retarded.

>>94909 first off how likely is that really, second they're the only thing preventing the pack of retards already raging on here non-stop from incessantly samefagging every single thread.

>>94911 >we need to stop posting stuff that 99% of the people here find hot and start autistically policing every post because I'm special and only jerk off to one specific thing and everything else offends me No. Grow up faggot.

>>94922 If you wanna jack off to feet, go to a website that focuses on that. This isn't a general porn board it's a tickle board, anything that's not tickling has little to no place here. You got one or two places to localize all the feet you want and that's a luxury as is. Don't be a retard acting like its an absurd concept. If you wanna act like a fag go back to tumblr or reddit. If you wanna go and make a feet only thread go and do it, I don't know why you're begging for my or anyone here's approval to do it.

>>94926 Name 1 feet board.

>>94926 Feet are prominent here because feet are ticklish dumbfuck. Does someone need to remind you?

>>94929 Aside from the very obvious footfetishforum.com ? There's picrel which has been around since the early 00s at least and still exists as a Tapatalk group (so you know it's all boomers).

>>94929 You go and find one, it's certainly not here >>94930 I'm not complaining about feet being prominent, I'm saying that the board is about tickling not feet. If you post feet with no tickling, it doesn't really have a place here. If you posted any other body part and it wasn't being tickled I'd call you a retard too. This isn't feet vs belly vs armpits, this is a simple truth: We are here for tickling, not feet. If you're here for feet enjoy what you get but you will not be catered to. When people post non-tickling content it completely defies the point of the board which is especially weird cause there is no shortage of content for any body part anywhere else.

>>94930 what anon probably means is that even though feet are ticklish they should not appear in the board merely for being feet (from a foot fetish incentive), and instead appear in tickling situations/context, or with ticklish implications how would you feel if i went around the board posting image of armpits and bellybuttons without any tickling? would not be ideal.