>>1578548
>It's really bad with Zelda, a series with no coherent timeline no matter how much its fans nag Nintendo into its half-assed attempts at creating one.
No. Donkey Kong lore is largely ironic. Tthere's a degree of it for real, but I think all the fans, even the ones who analyze it, do so with a hint of irony, knowing it's largely based on jokes and creators that openly dislike complex stories). Zelda lore is a whole different thing. Almost every Zelda game makes very clear how it relates to at least one other Zelda game. So I'm gonna be the loretist this time.
>Zelda I
First game.
>Zelda II
Direct follow up to Zelda I.
>Link to the Past
Actually not really clear in the game itself, but this is weirdly one of the few entries in the series nobody acts confused about. It's a prequel to the first game, and the box and manual say so explicitly, including in Japan (even though the Japanese title doesn't refer to "past" at all).
>Link's Awakening
Manual explicitly says it's a direct sequel to Link to the Past
>Faces of Evil/Wand of Gamelon/Zelda's Adventure
Obviously not canon but if we were going to say it was then it's clearly intended to take place after Zelda II. So are the Zelda cartoon and Captain N, and the Game & Watch, and the Game Watch. They're just chronological because they were made before Link to the Past or by people who didn't care.
>BS Zelda
I know, shouldn't even count, but it technically has a story and clearly takes place shortly after Zelda I, maybe after Zelda II.
>Ancient Stone Tablets
Has a bit more of a story, explicitly shortly after Link to the Past, and mentions that Link is off on an adventure, clearly Link's Awakening.
>Ocarina of Time
Very obviously has you play out the backstory from the intro of Link to the Past. The ending is different, and fans in their head chalked it up to the legend being corrupted over time (because no past Link was mentioned in the Link to the Past intro, even though that game already introduced the first past Link), but it turns out later games would make clear that, no, Ocarina is a prequel but also you're supposed to take everything in it literally. All the previously released games are sequels to Ocarina, but in a timeline where you lost to the final boss. Kind of silly, but it does all fit.
>Majora's Mask
Direct sequel to Ocarina.
>Oracle of Ages/Seasons
A little less explicit, but by the end it's a prequel to Link's Awakening, and therefore a sequel to Link to the Past.
>Wind Waker
Direct sequel to Ocarina, but confused people because it's a sequel to the other timeline created in Ocarina, which fans probably just didn't think about before. But it is clear here if you just take it all at face value and don't try to headcanon it all into one timeline (even though you still sort of can at this point).
>Four Swords
It's a side game added as extra content in a handheld remake of an old game. So yeah, this one doesn't make very clear where it is on the timeline. But it could fit pretty much anywhere.
>Four Swords Adventures
Multiplayer focused spinoff sequel to side game extra content in handheld remake. Has a story, but doesn't get terribly explicit on where it goes in the timeline. But Ganondorf has reincarnated so it takes place after he died in one of the other timelines. And Nintendo officially said it takes place after Majora's Mask (and the later released Twilight Princess), but I don't know if there's a particular reason why.
>Minish Cap
Prequel to Four Swords. The Four Swords games are somewhat disconnected from the rest, being a spinoff side series, but this one clearly takes place before Ocarina of Time.
>Twilight Princess
Explicitly follows Majora's Mask. And this is probably where people started getting really confused since now they're jumping between two different timelines, and this makes it so Majora's Mask really can't lead to Wind Waker without even more headcanon than fans were doing before, but if you take everything at face value, then it works.
>Phantom Hourglass
Direct sequel to Wind Waker.
>Spirit Tracks
Direct sequel to Spirit Tracks.
>Skyward Sword
The whole point is that it's the first game in the timeline (so far), taking place before everything else (even though it alludes to even more legends further in the past).
>Link Between Worlds
Direct sequel to Link to the Past, but long after Link's Awakening (but seemingly before Zelda I).
>Triforce Heroes
Another multiplayer spinoff with barely any story, but could pretty much fit anywhere. I'm pretty sure you're supposed to figure it's just a direct sequel to the previously released game, Link Between Worlds. But it's a multiplayer spinoff.
>Hyrule Warriors
For some reason they say this isn't canon, but it actually makes future games make sense. It's explicitly a sequel to Twilight Princess (and presumably Four Swords. Hyrule Warriors seems to take place quite a ways into the future). The story involves the Wind Waker timeline merging into this timeline, which explains major things from the next game.
>Breath of the Wild
Explicitly ten thousand years since the last time Ganon showed up, so at least ten thousand years in the future of any previous game. There are both Zora and Rito in the game, even though they're alternate timeline versions of each other, but the timelines merged in Hyrule Warriors, so it works.
[Expand Post]
>Age of Calamity
Lets you play the backstory from Breath of the Wild, 100 years before that game. And then actually it creates a different timeline. But still, its placement is extremely explicit.
>Tears of the Kingdom
Direct sequel to Breath of the Wild, but gets confusing for some people because it references new backstory about the founding of Hyrule. But again, I think if you just take it at face value it makes enough sense. Hyrule didn't exist in Skyward Sword, but it did in Minish Cap. So this backstory takes place between those two games.
>Echoes of Wisdom
Okay actually I just beat this one and I don't remember if it has any major clues on where it would go on the timeline. Kind of kills my whole argument. I think Nintendo says it's after Triforce Heroes but before Zelda I, but I couldn't tell why other than it being the first handheld style spinoff since Triforce Heroes. But only this game and the multiplayer handheld spinoffs don't make extremely clear where they go. The vast majority of the games in the series do.