>Okay. Have you read the Talmud?
Yes, not the whole thing and you haven't either but I did go through Talmud to tell you that it's also a meme.
>Shulchan Aruch
Not yet, I will look through it, but seeing the track record I assume it will also be a meme.
>Where do you think those ideologies came from?
Self hatred and utopianism as well as a want to escape reality
>Guess who controls it now.
A bunch of narcissistic fucks that believe they're better than everyone else and that they can reach an utopia if they bully people hard enough into complying.
>Guess who didn't control it centuries ago.
People in power were always pretty much the same as power structures naturally incentivise you to act like a bastard fo the sake of keeping in power. The current ruling class just follows the same psychological patterns as the previous ruling class.
>NOPE, IT HAS TO BE FAST BECAUSE ABSOLUTELY NO HUMAN BEING COULD EVER PLAN FOR SOMETHING OVER A LONG PERIOD OF TIME!
Planning over a long period of time !=being able to predict the future to the point where you are capable of upholding a conspiracy far beyond your lifespan and the lifespan of your children. Also you missed the point entirely. Nothing in the protocols of zion is anything special or conspiratorial - it's the stuff that any family/group or even individual with any influence trying to get more influence would do on their own, without the need of any conspiracy. That's just how power works, if you want to be in power you control everything that you can and fuck over any possible competition. It's really not that hard to understand.
>Upon which you can't elaborate or elucidate, of course
Springtime of Nations, French Revolution, The Enlightenment philosophers and their advocacy, the rise of classical liberalism, the fucking industrial revolution undermining the basis of monarchy, fuck, if you want to go back far enough - Monarchy was already being undermined back when Black Death rolled around. I didn't elaborate because anyone with even a cursory knowledge of history should know this.
> because doing so would reveal they were active measures (hmm, wonder where I've heard that phrase before) taken explicitly to achieve a long-term goal
Active measures like the Black Death, or economic development, the rise of Nationalism, philosophical development?
>Which religion. Which one. Specifically which one
Christianity because no other fucking place in the world had the scientific and industrial revolution to undermine their religious basis. Islam was already past the period of time where they did anything with their knowledge and preferred to roll in their rown shit, the East did literally fucking nothing outside of Japan who had to be forced to innovate.
>All others they're fine with. But one they're not.
No one is "fine" or trying to kill other religions. The other religions were not undermined because the people who worshipped them didn't actually have advancements that would shake their faith.
>Ah, so the authoritarians DID win, got it. Not "they lost" as you claimed earlier; but rather, they won.
The 20th century authoritarians lost, the current year authoritarians depends.
>And active measures were taken--across that entire period of history, by singular groups--to achieve said centralization.
The centralization was achieved through a back and forth of people with completely different political goals to each other nigger.
>What singular economic system controls every bank in every country in the world, and who was responsible for actively and purposely implementing this system.
Statist mixed socialist-leaning economy? And that was something that governments of the world were working towards because once again - control is simply a good idea when you are in power and want to keep in power. So of course they're going to fucking try and grab that control.
>And yet only one group wrote it and only one group implemented it.
Nigger, literally every single authoritarian ideology has basically the same tennets. Hell, Machiavelli basically wrote for the rulers to act similarly to what is described in Protocols long before the Protocols were written.
It would be harder to find an authoritarian regime that doesn't inflate the currency, control the market, puts itself above religious law, controls it citizens etc than one that does.
>What the fuck is wrong with your brain that you can't comprehend time preference?
I can comprehend time preference just fine, once again time preference is a different thing than predicting the future.
>How the hell do you think a bridge gets built?
The circumstances of the bridge do not change as drastically over a century as politics anon.
>Oh, so you're LITERALLY just trolling, then. Got it; thanks for confirming.
How am I trolling?
>A century or more, yes.
That's far too long in something as volatile as politics.
>Which exist.
It's literally nothing but a bunch of vague truisms, it's not a writeup.
>MUH FEE FEES
Not what I said
>Funny how they were implemented by the people who wrote them and ONLY by the people who wrote them, then, isn't it?
Except they weren't? Literally every single authoritarian ruler either tried to implement them or implemented them across history. Hell, North Korea is a modern example of doing exactly the same thing.
>They didn't. You're brain damaged or paid to lie if you think this.
No u
>Two More Weeks, right?
Also not what I said.