>>43151 I've never seen faster than it is nowadays, and that's more of a you problem if you can't visit a clearnet site like this without TOR. If you've decided on using TOR things won't always go as fast, that's just a compromise you signed up for. Webp is a lossy fileformat that can't give an uncompressed look, JPG 100% quality gives a lossless look at a lower filesize than a PNG would. PNG is insanely cost efficient with very graphic images, like logos, black and white images, few tone images, etc, any situation where there is large chunks of imagedata that contains the exact same colour. JPG is insanely cost efficient with very detailed images, like photographs, very detailed rasters, anything with large variance and noise. WEBM is a JPG competitor that is only focused on being low in filesize to save image hosting sites money and focuses on it's comparative quality to a compressed JPG as being "minorly worse", but worse. It adds a blur/softening to the images removing a lot of details that would otherwise be left in a JPG. Also, I wouldn't recommend any compression on a JPG either, so that's why I'm avidely against WEBM because it's both worse and does not provide a compression that leaves the visible pixels untouched. (a 100% quality JPG still crunches the image, but only in a way that's noticeable by crushing the levels of the image in a editor, the un-edited image is identical to a losless image)

>>43026 >>43008 Thanks for doing these!

>>42841 https://civitai.com/models/998423

>>43152 >Webp is a lossy fileformat that can't give an uncompressed look This is wrong. Webp supports a lossless compression mode and it can produce smaller lossless files than lossy JPEG at quality 100.

>>43152 Dunning-Kruger

>>43197 > buzzwords Ebin

>>43191 Then I stand corrected and I'm all for it.

Some guy on reddit has been smithing custom LORAs for messing. Lots of great examples on his profile. He wants 50 bones for access. I'm thinking about it since it has real potential but I don't know shit about how to use these. Anyone who is good at this stuff want to give it a try? https://old.reddit.com/r/AIAccidents/comments/1h6puji/announcement_pantypoop_pantspoop_messydiaper_more/?ref=share&ref_source=link

>>43416 https://civitai.com/user/secreteaccout1493745 Those are their public models. Judge for yourself. I think there's a lot of cherry picking and inpainting to fix issues with images rather than generating what you see on reddit as a one off generation with a simple workflow.

Can I requesting two giant size male babies between the ages of 1 and 4, both about five feet tall, with one baby having short black hair and black eyes and one baby with short brown hair and brown eyes, both with slightly chubby bodies, and wearing only plain white diapers, standing, full body, smiling, anime style. Keep it SFW please

>>43452 Something based off of this, please.

Counter request: >>42933 more like these please, muh dick!

hyvid is p. good

>>43613 Here's more. Anything particular? Just did a few fast gens. >>43452 This will take me more time. You mean giants? Nothing else?

>>43452 Seems like it is not that easy to do without using OpenPose or something similar. Keywords such as baby change the composition of the whole image, and giant_male isn't doing much but adding giants on top of the other characters. I might try composing a picture (background: houses, foreground: normal sized characters scaled up) manually as you can remove the background very easily with Inspyrenet Rembg, but with text alone, one would probably need a fitting LoRA.

>>35729 I wonder what kind of AI this guy uses for his art, since it looks really good: https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/109080477

>>43654 Something like that. I mean a regular baby, but the same size as a normal human.

>>43654 Do you have any models for western cartoons/comics?

>>43654 Unf, that's the stuff >Anything particular? Just did a few fast gens. I have pretty simple tastes: light bondage (handcuffs), desperation (banging on a bathroom door, etc), getting teased (especially by younger characters/boys the same age). I also tend like long black hair more than short brown, but it doesn't really matter.

>>43694 Thanks, that's some scenarios I could try to play with. First tries with light bondage weren't too nice, the faces usually show some agony and the eyes turn weird, but maybe that can be fixed with other tags.

It pains me that this is one of the only threads on the board with worthwhile OC coming out of it and yet it still falls off the first page ;_;

For Illustrious or NoobAI-XL, does anyone have any names of artists that naturally do ABDL images? Apparently they work better when an artist is mentioned, so I figure starting with one that has diapers normally would help start the generation off on the right foot.

>>43786 For illustrious I'd say it's more about the model itself. The more "normal" checkpoint knowledge it has merged or trained on top of it, the more you get bad "safe for work wholesome cut toddler diapers" results or it converges towards not knowing it and making it like weird panties. Attached is the models I currently have downloaded, Falafelmix is the only one that has stayed in my list since it came out, and several of these have not been throughly tested yet for whether or not I want to keep them currently. Trying to merge a better realism model myself using SaltedPonyV5 that doesn't compromise Illustrious versatility, but I think the community is now ramping up on realism merges so they'll probably get it working nicely way before I do. DPM++ 3M SDE [Align Your Steps GITS] - 30steps masterpiece, best quality, highres, absurdres BREAK 1girl, stocking, female, woman, pose, diaper, big diaper lowres, worst quality, bad quality, bad anatomy, jpeg artifacts, bad composition, 2koma, 4koma, comic, multiple views

>>43786 I created some LoRAs for Illustrious-XL of an ABDL artists such as: Kuma Dasai, cakies22, cumbiology, merunyaa, omufujoshi, Mika hime, Popokin, alice99narumi https://civitai.com/collections/6545822

I managed to improve the dataset, which makes the new version significantly better https://civitai.com/models/963628?modelVersionId=1184399

>>43943 Very nice. Did you train it on WAI-NSFW? I'm not getting as clear results from other checkpoints.

Santa checking if you've been naughty or nice

messed around with illustrious a bit, super fast to run and theres some decent LORAs on civit ai already, definitely reccomend for a non-realistic look

>>43997 You might want to use the standard SDXL VAE, you have lots of white spots in your images, and it could also be why the results are very grey and dull.

>>43999 Not 'op' but curious. Is that a base Illustrious VAE issue? I haven't seen that using whatever VAE red dot pops out of the node.

>>43999 im using comfyui with and have literally never touched the VAE node, not even sure how to lol