NEED cute boyfriend!

>>516 Same, i'd give anything for a cute bf.

>>536 Worst part is most cute boys are huge sluts. I want someone who's cute & loyal only to me.

>>542 You have to turn them loyal anon, with your dick!

>>547 But I want them to be pure! Not floozies that take cocks on the regular! That's the problem because like almost all of them are like that! Floozies!

>>548 The answer is obvious then make another anon your boyfriend

>>549 Where would I possibly find a cute virgin anon to marry?

>>551 Hmmm I'm not sure what you're implying, anon. Maybe you should give me your contact info like a dicksword so we can discuss this further.

Well this thread took a turn. You guys gonna fuck?

>>552 E-eeh, but i'll have to make an account! Is Element fine?

>>554 I don't know what element is!

>>555 >dicksword geez anon, this is a bad look for a BO y'know kazbeat#9509

>>556 A boy who's cute & has power? Anon you have me swooning already!

Inb4 this all goes horribly wrong for kaz somehow

>>558 Inb4 it all goes great and they're together for many happy years.

>>558 this is interesting

>>559 I mean I hope so, but I still reserve the right to say "I told you so",and act incredibly smug later, if it all goes tits up.

>>555 Element is front-end software for the matrix protocol, basically chatting software similar to dicksword but FOSS. It also actually encrypts your messages so your gay ERPing can't be read by anyone with access to the servers like they can on shitscord.

Well? Did you guys fuck yet?

>>563 >implying anons live anywhere near each other The curse of distance is the one thing stopping anons from achieving world domination.

>>564 Tell me about it. It's crazy hard to find people in Texas to begin with. Much less cute feminine boys.

>>563 Yeah, no.

>>563 Anon blocked me...Gold, I just wanted to be your friend, i'm so lonely. (ಥ﹏ಥ) Why do people always do this to me.

>>574 That's what you get for using gayscord

>>575 I guess, if anything this reinforces my cynical worldview as the right one.

>>576 You should expect every person you interact with online to ghost you within 48 hours. I guess you could call that cynical but that's just how it goes. Not really worth getting bothered by. Personally I see zero reason to maintain online social interaction with someone I know I'll never meet unless I already know there's significant overlapping interests in vidya or something. But I'm also not going around adding random retards and then blocking them, but I don't hold the same standards for everyone else as I do myself.

>>577 Checked and agreed

>>574 What happened? That sucks anon. I'm sorry.

>>598 We were too far apart, maybe anon did a good thing by blocking me instead of giving me hope that never was there in the first place.

>>601 Yeah bro, plus I think he may have been gay. Anyway maybe the next guy will be better.

Also underrated thread

Call me to exchange (boys) Telegram: https://t.me/alladiner333

oc

Reposting from another bread