>>77397 Would you take... more orc shemales...?

>>77420 Shill, piggie.

>>77421 I don't have a good profile prepared (mine is older, deprecated and basically unused). I will when I give it a new coat of paint. Or you can give me your /c/ and I'll contact you after doing that.

>>77370 I don't necessarily hate it. I actually like the little icons in chat and on the sides. That being said. Everything else looks awful and goofy as hell. What's with the constant assertion from UI developers that UIs need to have child-like elements with rounded edges and large buttons? Take me back to my Windows XP aesthetic please. Give me hard, harsh edges and small, compact UI elements.

>>77423 They're trying to copy discord, that much is obvious.

>>77423 Changing it makes no sense to me just because of: if it ain't broke, don't fix it and the current UI sure as shit ain't broke.

>>77425 welcome to modernslop

>>77426 I'll slop you modernly, bb.

Anyone know the character limit for profiles? I know it's 4096 for rooms, ~16k for notes and 50k for DMs.

>>77427 Can you slop me in a classic way?

>>77428 Ask GHC

>>77421 What is your BLC like? What race?

>>77428 (Me) >>77430 Tested it, it's 200k. If you want to be anal it's 200k for the body text, 1024 for each custom kink with there being a max of 500 of those (for 512k characters) and 255 characters in each image description (with a max of 50) or 12.75k. So you could theoretically craft something that uses all 724.75k characters. However if you're attempting to do that you might as well use all the 50 images (which are 4kx4k max for non-inline ones iirc) and some 4x4 font (in reality will be at least 5x5 with the space around it) to get another 32 million characters if you used absolutely zero paragraphs or line breaks. This is all for non-subscribers, I dunno how being a sub will change the numbers other than increasing the image count to 150.

>>77431 >What race Monaco Grand Prix.

Now I want to make an elf BLC to tame orcs

>>77434 >When the BLC is older than you

>>77434 Raspy Dunmer BLC...

>>77430 My profiles aren't that long thoughever. The longest bio is 50k or something but most are shorter than a typical post.

>>77434 draenei blc

>>77436 Also, new lookout.best is up. https://xariah.net/artcheck/

Foxes?

Foxes?

>Think about shilling in the old thread >Go see what's going on over there Why is it so horrible?

Tred.

>>77441 shouldn't they be saggier?

>>77442 Why even bother with that schizo shitheap

>>77444 Gravity defying porn tits have their own charm

>>77446 those aren't gravity defying, though they have a bit of sag built into their shape they aren't complete spheres

>>77444 No, because I like impossible tits.

>>77448 impossible tits in a sling bikini

>>77447 They're not sagging anywhere near as much as they should though. Hence gravity defying.

>>77448 Based. But I like saggers too.

>>77440 >>77441 Foxes.

>>77450 Yeah but hardly any f-list hyper titties sag to a realistic extent.

>>77454 >>77454 >>77454

>>77420 I would! Even more if they're into the ageplay aspect or nice and thicc~