>>11043 lolita was a rapist.

>>11043 It's a little overdone stylistically and it's massively over hyped, honestly. Its certainly been beaten to death by every feminist author or student out there. Like, literally it feels like every other junior chick in undergrad has either read the book or written a term paper on it. It's all just so trite and uninspired at this point. It's also not a very good representation of the average pedophile if we're being upfront. Presumably, most pedophiles are just average people, men usually, who are just trying to live their lives and pay their bills and pay taxes... and not get murdered or fired over existing. We're not galavanting around New England trying to bang every tween out there. We're certainly not entering into these kind of forced lavender relationships with mothers on the tenuous hope that we can have some underground clandestine relationship with her daughters. Don't get me wrong, some do all that but most don't. Most of all, it's just really negative representation for our people. We want more positivity around here—we're at the very least, not something so dark and negative and grave. Show me a film or a book that doesn't starkly paint pedophiles as these would be monsters or tortured souls who are struggling to control themselves. Show me a film where you have a dude with normal relationships who's just living his life the best he can and is a normal guy. That's the film I wanna see. That's the breath of fresh air we all desperately need at this point.

>>11081 >beaten to death by every feminist Yikes

>>11081 You underestimate how stupid men are when horny. Great successful have ruined their lives because they thought too much with their little head. Despite me thinking cheating is bad I've seen plenty of men treat it casually and fuck as many women as they realistically can. I've seen the type of men who "date" single mothers and they are often down low pedos who take advantage of the kids and overall situation. I think pedos can be just as retarded and thirsty for sex as the average guy because really it's a slavery thing where most guys are only seemingly against it out of fear for the current corrupt government and status quo. Pedos shouldn't be openly accepted until whore culture is killed, otherwise it's just going to be a worse free for all than it already is. A lot has to change.

>>11087 We can (and should) repeal the anti-pedo laws before then, though.

>>11091 Until we get rid of the people who can't control themselves, we cannot do anything about antis.

>>11092 >the people who can't control themselves Just say niggers

>>11093 Most moIesters that get caught are white :^)

>>11094 Jews aren't white

>>11083 Problem? >>11087 I didn't say pedophiles we impervious to doing stupid things to get laid. We're people, and people can do some weird shit, including over sex. I said that presumably most pedophiles were normal people living their lives, making the best out of a bad situation. That much is true. We're just trying to survive in this shit show. Reading "loli" gives you this impression we're all suave predators who obsess over little girls' every move. That ain't it, chief.

>>11104 I'm saying if even men much better than you can't act right when horny and obsess over sex I have no reason to trust pedos won't also do stupid shit with kids if the limitations on them were removed. Parents are already failing their kids as it is, they don't need more pedos swarming then trying to get their nut. Until casual sex is punished again pedos are just going to make the problems we have worse. I don't think you having your attraction to younger girls is necessarily a problem but at the same time it doesn't always stop at attraction, you inevitably want a piece of what you're fantasizing about if it's at all possible. Like I said in another thread about irl traps/femboys there's also a lot of pedos that just fetishize kids and won't stick with them once they get older. So basically you're just going to be using these kids for sex and then dumping them once they get older like is already done with a lot of young but legal whores. It's not sustainable and will mess the kids up even worse for the rest of their life because what happens to you as a kid sticks with you. As of now it's better that pedos are on edge even if it sucks that innocent ones are demonized with the rest. Acceptance can and will go south fast because of what I described.

>>11106 >traps/femboys Ew

>>11108 I agree just about every 3d trap/femboy looks gross but the 2d that are made look amazing. A lot of things are better in 2d though.

>>11110 Yeah because you can just literally draw a female and just say its a trap.

>>11111 I mean that's basically what a trap is and why it's so appealing. The dick does still technically make it gay but you won't see men like that irl.

>>11113 >I mean that's basically what a trap is Then they basically don't exist irl

>>11111 >>11113 I think it's androgyny that makes femboys so appealing. They're not fully male but not female either.

>>11116 Well I know that >>11117 For me I think the best part is how they are basically extremely feminine women but with dicks. There's usually little to no masculine features on them. Part of the appeal is that they don't actually exist irl too. I still see people on different chans calling 3d men in drag traps even though they're not fooling anybody.

>>11118 >For me I think the best part is how they are basically extremely feminine women but with dicks Nigga u gay

>>11049 >"Rape"

>>11120 I don't deny it being gay but what does it mean when you're not attracted to real men? Even the guys that try to imitate 2d traps don't come very close to being the same.

>>11113 That's the worst part. Just draw a girl and call her a guy and you'll get praised for your laziness.

>>11130 Read the bible

>>11131 Except that's literally the appeal. Even men who go all the way with surgery and hormones don't look as good as 2d traps, the dick is the only thing they have in common and even then irl dicks still look pretty different from 2d and trap dicks. Anime and that style in general is hyper feminine and impossible for the average woman to compete with never mind biological men. >>11136 Why

>>11137 It has the answers to all your questions.

>>11106 What are you talking about, you tard? I'm not right wing reactionary who hates sex. Why the hell do I care if people have casual sex or not? Why does any normal person honestly care what two "consenting adults" do in their free time? It's weird and neckbeard-y. Fuck off with that shit. Off our backs with this regressive BS, teleio.

garbage cuck book for losers protagonist just can't stop being ntr'd. he gets cucked at least 3 different times in the book

>>11139 Cuck

>>11137 I don't care about any of that. I care about lazy artists getting rewarded for doing nothing.

>>11139 >Why the hell do I care if people have casual sex or not? You wouldn't and neither would other pedos, that's my point. The average person is retarded especially with sex and the average pedo isn't any better so appealing to whatever is the new normal won't work here. It's been proven women who get fucked casually can't maintain or keep a relationship as well as a chaste woman can. The baggage women carry from past relationships is obvious if you pay attention. You say this talk is regressive yet you're imitating animals and older dumber humans by pretending there's no problem with women being whores either socially or biologically because "muh two consenting adults". At least actual animals have the excuse of being stupid and not knowing better while humans need willful ignorance to keep doing what's good feeling and low effort. But since even legal age/physically mature women get damaged from sex the damage is even worse for children because whatever happens to them in that stage of development shapes the rest of their life. A lot of children who were pumped and dumped went into sex work because that's how they were taught to live early in life. You want to pretend pedos are just these misunderstood tortured souls when really they're responsible for destroying many children even while pedos have the constant threat of death and harassment on them. If people become more accepting of pedos they'll feel more comfortable to dogpile on already damaged kids just so they can have their orgasm.

>>11145 You're legit a posterchild for some weird neo-con BS. Your views are repugnant and, frankly, wholly peculiar. I'm not even gonna waste time continuing this conversation; it's disgusting. I don't know why I expect more normal, level-headed conversation from the kind of loser-y loner types who frequent chat boards. It's like this place is a magnet for the socially disaffected and awkward trapped in their own little bubble of fundamentalism and hardline reactionary nonsense.

>>11148 All attacks, no arguments.

>>11148 >You're legit a posterchild for some weird neo-con BS. Your views are repugnant and, frankly, wholly peculiar. I'm not even gonna waste time continuing this conversation; it's disgusting Maybe reddit would be more your speed

>>11092 If children nowadays are smart enough to get into college at the age of 9, they can consent

>>11207 I don't care if a child genius of age 8 solves all global problems and becomes leader of the world before hooking their Iolita brain into a computer to become humanity's tiny overlord, she still can't consent until 18 years of age.