/hebe/ - hebe

Secret Club

Index Catalog Archive Bottom Refresh
Name
Options
Subject
Message

Max message length: 12000

files

Max file size: 32.00 MB

Total max file size: 50.00 MB

Max files: 5

Supported file types: GIF, JPG, PNG, WebM, OGG, and more

E-mail
Password

(used to delete files and posts)

Misc

Remember to follow the Rules

The backup domains are located at 8chan.se and 8chan.cc. TOR access can be found here, or you can access the TOR portal from the clearnet at Redchannit 3.0.

Uncommon Time Winter Stream

Interboard /christmas/ Event has Begun!
Come celebrate Christmas with us here


8chan.moe is a hobby project with no affiliation whatsoever to the administration of any other "8chan" site, past or present.

(896.46 KB 1372x1952 omega_smug.png)

Amoral Discussion Anonymous 05/23/2021 (Sun) 18:02:09 No. 3762
Sociopath thread, post here if you can turn off your empathy or just state a horrendously sinful desire. No empty, vacuous attacks on people for amoral posts. This is the containment thread for them.
>>6849 >People never change, it's always the same. It doesn't matter where you go or how "free speech" people claim to be, there's always a bad guy and there's always someone they're willing to censor to feel better about themselves. Of course it is, I'm not a pedo but for the most part there isn't really a freedom of speech question, but what it the limit, how far should people go with their speech. Most people including you have a limit, it's not really to feel better about themselves it's because they just dislike it and are apathetic to the content. This same thought process happened when /hebe/ was banned , many people on the original site mainly on gamergate threads liked the fact that it died, it was basically a huge liability. The same thing happened when 8chan died, many 4gaggers were pissing themselves on twitter saying that it was a good thing that 8chan died and that the site was horrible. Currently internet censorship is increasing across the globe, and it will increase futher in the future as more people are influenced by communities and stories on the internet. But this is mainly being done by corporations like YouTube and cloudflare who are being pressured more into censoring certian content by governments around the globe, trying to find the line when it comes to freedom of expression. But it is also done by ISPs on behalf of governments. https://news.umich.edu/extremely-aggressive-internet-censorship-spreads-in-the-worlds-democracies/ https://www.theneweconomy.com/technology/a-sorry-site-8chan-gets-the-axe-raising-questions-about-internet-censorship https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/03/24/online-moderation-tech-stack/
>>3831 >If you lack that instinct, or it's very weak, I think something isn't quite right. I actually don't like children or the idea of having them.
>>3935 Do people disagree with this statement because they’re so docile and feminized that they cannot imagine males being more aggressive than females?
>>7121 I'll bite the hook. People disagree with it for a number of reasons. Here are a few: >This statement does not match both lived experience and statistical data, both of which strongly indicate that women are more violent and aggressive. >This statement is often made by people who have an agenda against men, and since man-hating femoids have not changed the script in like 15 years, everyone knows who they are immediately or just dismissing them as lazy trolls. >Data shows men are more likely to be attacked than women are, and that women make up at least 50% of all domestic abusers. The legal system is biased against men, every major media outlet is constantly discussing that men are evil, and we live in a very anti-male world. Strictly speaking, most guys are tired of it, and it's cathartic to pick the low hanging fruit where you don't have a huge establishment bearing down on you for stepping too far out of line. There are plenty more reasons to disagree, but the core point is that there aren't really any reasons to agree with this. It simply isn't true. Here is some literature, with a good few sources of it's own all at the bottom: https://web.archive.org/web/20170724102111/http://www.bestgore.com:80/guest-post/societal-misandry-in-the-anti-male-world/
>>7095 >I actually don't like children Why are you here?
>>7129 Baited on the overboard
>>7129 rape
>>7156 kill self jew
The era of society being a bunch of pussies waiting for the cops to deal with you is ending. You'd better learn to moralfag, you're going to need to.
>>9156 Lol. You got anything else to say great keyboard warrior?
>>3860 Based rational BO. I consider myself an enlightened anti and ylu have my respect.
>>4525 Did you know its a pretty common sexual fantasy? Freud noticed it appeared routinely in his patient's reports, he wrote a text about it called "a children is hit" or something something. Youre not sick in the head, not so much I mean. Try to look at it under a different light.
>>3773 >blackmail/coercion is hurtcore Why do this and rape need to be put under an umbrella term. There's already tags for both with hentai. Do forced or guro count?
>>4525 I get what you mean, the act itself is not what bring you pleasure but its seeing the side that is normally hidden, the sort of vulnerability and helplessness you'd expect to see when one's guard is down or broken. A sort of emotional core if you will, that you wish you bear witness to in a paternal sense?
(1.28 MB 1000x1600 ClipboardImage.png)

Why do many people have such a hardon for protecting children? Children aren't different than any other type of human. Most of them are terrible. Many of them are assholes. And the majority of the terrible ones will grow up to be terrible adult humans and do nothing but hurt other people and ruin everything they touch. What's the deal with this ridiculous massive blanket assessment that ALL children are worth protecting? Most of them fucking aren't, and most of the genuinely good children are already plenty protected by their loving parents. I'm not saying I want to HURT kids. I would get absolutely no joy or pleasure out of that at all. But at the same time, whenever I see a shitty kid get what's coming to them I'm not upset either.
>>10334 Because, for the most part, children can't protect themselves. It's incredibly easy to force them to do things, to hurt them, to take things away from them, and to deny them things like agency and respect. They cannot retaliate against somebody older than them because of the difference in physical strength and size. It's roughly the same reasoning as old school people who insist hitting women is wrong and that women need to be taken care of and protected. As for why it applies to every kid instead of just the nice ones, just because a child is acting like a shithead doesnt mean they don't deserve love and care. If a child is having a meltdown, acting out, or some other third thing then chances are there is a reason behind it that they don't know how to articulate. I'm a pedo, I believe children should be treated with respect, love, and in general like human beings. That doesn't mean I'm going to pretend like I (an adult) can handle things and articulate my feelings and thoughts in ways a child can't. They don't have enough experience in life to voice, for example, why it makes them upset that the teacher dismissed them. They don't know how to put into words that they feel like they aren't being loved. It's not that they don't have emotions and feelings and complex ideas and things, it's putting those things into language; They just don't have the necessary skills to voice it the way an adult does. Every child deserves the chance to build that experience.
(695.92 KB 660x795 ClipboardImage.png)

>>10335 >Every child deserves the chance EVERY child? (image is allowed because she's 19 now and in this image)
>>10336 Yes, how they use that chance (or waste it) is up to them. In the case of people who do things because they are mentally ill, I'd be willing to wager the parents have some measure of responsibility. Either they failed to notice the problem and get their child help, or they were part of the problem to begin with.
>>10337 Naw man fuck that. If you kill another human being NOT explicitly in self defense I don't care how old, mentally ill, or drugged you are you are guilty of murder and deserve to die.
>>10338 You think a toddler who found his dads gun and accidentally fires it, killing someone, should be executed? You think a person who is disabled and cannot function being left alone with a weapon is at fault for hurting themselves or others? You think a person, whose brain or mind is measurably unwell, is solely responsible for their actions when they are enabled (through negligence or through direct action) to do harm to others? Explain to me how you are any different from a hurtcore kike, if you can so easily dismiss all particulars and declare that it is reasonable and just to end the life of a person in all those cases and more, without even allowing for some degree of flexibility.
>>10339 Also, that your immediate response is to just kill them, rather than exhaust every other possible option first, makes you no better then a murderer. The death penalty is necessary sometimes, but it should be the absolute last resort.
>>10336 clearly still an evil kike look at her face will do it again would bet money on it
>>10339 >>10340 ohhh be still, my bleeding heart every case is unique and dealt with differently, and an accidental misfire is dealt with vastly fucking differently from an intentional STABBING the slenderman stabber cunt didn't even KILL the girl, but she stabbed her fucking 20 GODDAMN TIMES what, did she ACCIDENTALLY lure her friend out to the woods and stab her in the kidney and stomach and only by a stroke of luck miss a major artery????? she's a horrible human and needed to be killed and there are countless others like her getting the benefit of the blanket notion that "children are innocent and/or too stupid to understand what they're doing" and society is quickly filling up with adult sociopaths actively manipulating the system the ruin life for other people also, you're retarded kiss my ass
>>10342 You're going to encounter endless simping from the faggot retards that go AUWAUWWUAW YANDERE UUUUUUUUHhHHhHHH h JUST LIKE MY ANIEMEESESESe every time. Don't be surprised, the tragedy is the simps are never the ones getting murdered.
>>10342 Complete misrepresentation of what I just said. I did not say it was an accident you lying kike, you just want to play mental gymnastics to justify that you absolutely want to end peoples lives and you are hiding behind "but they are bad though" as an excuse. What do you think antis do, when they talk about murdering pedophiles? "Its okay, because they are bad/dont count as people". Also, that isnt a child, and this completely falls in line with what I am saying. look at that face, she will kill again, and it will be the fault of the retard lazy kike doctors who let her go. The stabbing was just as much the fault of parents ignoring the warning signs as it was the child's. Its not that she isnt responsible, its that she isnt the only one and that is what I was saying in response to your question. But go ahead, deliberately misrepresent me and call me names, you know what your doing. >>10343 >woman is involved, therefore simp quote a single line in this entire thread from anybody at all that can even remotely be considered anything even tangentially related to "simping" you insane incel.
>>10383 oh shit the simp is maaaaaaaad
>>10384 Wow dude incredibly epic troll you sure got me. I can't believe I fell for the old "I'm a retard look at me" routine! You sure showed me, and I sure had it coming for expressing a thought longer than one sentence fragment! Gosh I guess I'll just go tell wizchan that it's over and that I'm gonna kill myself
>>10383 Defending crazed granny killers is simping, put 'em down they're of no use to anyone, not even fit to be bred anymore since they'll just kill their babies next.
>>10385 kek not even me you were replying to btw way to go, spaz
be excellent to each other or end up in the containment thread. Don't defend crazy psychos that stab cute 12 year olds and don't bully the disabled.
>>10388 > Don't defend crazy psychos that stab cute 12 year olds rulecuck
>pedofags: "omg we are unnecessarily opwessed! pedophilia is a form of child love!!1!!" >also pedofags: cancerous sociopatj faggotry
>>10861 I never claimed any of that I have always been a believer in kindness and love :^)
Edited last time by granny on 12/17/2021 (Fri) 03:44:55.
>>10868 >amoral thread >can't even speak my mind anymore yeah rulecucked
>>3783 >Is there a lot of overlap with hurtcore fans and yukkuri abuse? Yukkuri abusers are mostly chubby Japanese sixth graders on 2ch that take their aggression out with drawings, since they can't make school shooting threats because only military can have guns in nippon.
>>10870 cuck thread on cuck board


Forms
Delete
Report
Quick Reply