>>8779 Maybe make them stick to their own age? Bring back child marriages? >>8778 >Get a loli sex doll or bot >find one of the brothels in europe >research a method to turn back the biological age of organisms and mentally retard them

>>8780 Girls should be married as babies to adult men who can raise them as daughter-wives and help them learn while also being their lover and eventually they will become beautiful homemakers and have more cute babies who will be raised in the same fashion.

>>8781 Based. It should be required to pump out as many cute babies as possible as soon as they are able to btw. We should genetically modify humans to have twins every time minimum.

>>8781 daughter wives makes for interesting porn, but taking in to account multiple stages of the child's development it would run into problems. A first would be the child having a biological inclination to shit test you. Another might be familiarity breeding contempt though having more cute babies might curve that for a bit. Another might be the child needing a connection to bigger network of people, unless you intend to be the her sole means of interaction. If there's a rebellion phase, you might have to rape her, which may damage her and bring down her opinion of you as a fatherly figure and lover.

>>8782 If it were up to me, girls would age slowly, physically peak at 3 and inexplicably have the vaginal stretchiness and carrying capacity to become safely pregnant and deliver lots of cute babies every time.

>>8784 So you want a semi-living sex toy and don't care about the cute brains of older children.

>>8781 Trying to get a blowjob would likely be a bitch when teeth start growing in as the infant will likely be teething, and rupturing the vagina at an early age would likely result in pain that could bring down trust or worst with regard to physical development. Would you have a first mother for this lineage?

>>8785 No I said physically peak at 3, they would mentally develop past 3 but remain in baby-toddler girl bodies. >>8786 I said the baby should have a stretchier vagina here >>8784 If it was more realistic you would have to wait to not hurt her, but you could give her cunny licks and kisses and cockfeed her which would still be based. Cock feeding not necessarily from your tip but maybe a bottle mixed with milk or what have you.

There are a bunch of fucking psychos here all of a sudden wtf

>>8787 Oral sex isn't healthy for babies because eye contact is extremely important for all their social interactions, and you can't do that if your face is buried in her crotch.

>>8789 Not with that attitude, maybe

>>8789 there's also outercourse

>>8781 There two situations I can think of where these reflections would be reasonable. The first would be if you were held at gunpoint to fuel a cuck's fetish of seeing a child getting fucked, and he threatened to kill the child. The second would be in a situation where you could biologically reinstate childhood or infancy in an already mature individual through age regression. The 1st albeit rare is possible if you're dealing with a aggressive coomer of that nature, the second pertains to the existence of a jellyfish which has the ability to regress in age. If it ever becomes technologically possible to regress fully mature adults or accelerate childhood development both physically and mentally, you would have to redefine the rules of such conduct to account for these possibilities.

>>8788 There are two situations I can think of where these reflections would be reasonable. The first would be if you were held at gunpoint to fuel a cuck's fetish of seeing a child getting fucked by an adult, and he threatened to kill the child and/or you. The second would be in a situation where you could biologically reinstate childhood or infancy in an already mature individual through age regression. The 1st albeit rare is possible if you're dealing with a aggressive coomer of that nature, the second pertains to the existence of a jellyfish which has the ability to regress in age. If it ever becomes technologically possible to regress fully mature adults or accelerate childhood development both physically and mentally, you would have to redefine the rules of such conduct to account for these possibilities.

>>8792 >>8794 I slept on this and reread it three times and I still have no fucking idea what it means or why you needed to post it twice.

>>8795 I've noticed there are a few retards that just repeat the same thing over and over again. Chinks do it too when they think they've found a line that works for them.

>>8796 your social credit score go down gwailo

>Agent Small talking about other's people social credit score if your reputation could be scored, it'd go into the negatives not that I agree with that, as a matter of fact, I don't think you should be considered legally human at all, since you're factually inhuman

>>8799 >>8798 Get a room you two Also kill yourselves

>>8800 I didn't ask the spic to come be a spic here, he can go be a spic somewhere else, I was posting on topic. Also, cope, manlet.

>>8795 The 1st one was a mistake that wasn't deleted. The second was just revisions for the sake of grammar and spelling. The point is there exist circumstances in which it would not be detrimental or unethical to have sexual relations with a child.

>>8802 >There exist circumstances in which it would not be.. that is the default, though. It's the rule, not the exception, that sex with children is good

>>8804 basederino

i hate you people so much

>>8806 cope

>>8768 >Wahhhh I want to campaign for Democrats so I'm going to pretend I care about them even tho they can and do fuck each other all the time !!! Kids screwing kids is way more moral that some dumbfuck pedo getting off >t. Had a very sexual childhood

>>10317 >posting on /leftypol/ is perfectly ok as long it's not pedos doing it

>>10323 If leftyfags wanna cry about based pedos they should fuck off to another wing. Alex Jones said the left was all about pedophilia but he said it like it was a bad thing (unbased). He didn't say it was bad because he wanted some ch!ldren for himself either, which would at least be an understandable viewpoint. If the left is pro pedo let's go there and take over it!

>>10328 Alex Jones has good points about some things regarding this, the problem is he is a boomer and views pedophilia as identical to the child killing and hurtcore kikery of the 'elite' (larping legacy faggots that are mostly genetically dysfunctional kikes.) In reality the psycho child murderers and rapists have nothing in common with pedophiles, sex and rape are two different things entirely, but the antis have done much to conflate all sex as rape or as harmful as rape - which is simply not true and has been proven in studies such as Rind to not be true. In reality neither the right nor the left are really all that pedophilia inclined, the far right are usually puritan philosemites and the left wing are usually deviant philosemites. But philosemitism is child abuse, not child love.

>>10329 I'm not trying to horseshoe theory, same thing both sides, I'm le centrist man here btw I don't feel represented on most issues by established political actors in general.

Thread derailed by people unaware of word filters.

>>10331 nope

trips