>>31179 >They just have the fetish? Surely, something i won't deny is that there are leftists that have a BNWO fetish too, but by the very nature of this fetish, to the extent they do, they have racist beliefs, racist beliefs are essential for this fetish because the idea of the black male as an inferior non equal being that taints a woman after fucking her is a racist idea. Everyone has subconscious 'racist' and 'sexist' beliefs. Since in this day and age racist and sexist can be applied to anyone who notes even a small difference in races or subspecies of homo-sapiens and genders. By such definition - I would aloofly classify all leftists as racists - I have seen over and over how leftists react to positive stereotypes about black and asian people - even though both of those positive stereotypes by their noted existence imply that another race doesn't have as much of whatever attribute the positive stereotype represents in abundance. A noted difference, a racist judgement. The left doesn't practice what they preach, and they never have. The left will in one moment preach racial diversity, but in the next gleefully fantasize about Trump deporting his Hispanic supporters because diversity didn't fully serve their agenda like they had hoped. The left espouses people to live among diversity, but everyone who has seen a demographic map of major city in the US shows that the leftist hotspots of each city are racially segregated. Leftists will say that all people are genetically the same in intelligence, but studies note that they 'talk down' to their minority political allies and also use more basic elementary language. Leftists tell us we need to let in all illegals who claim they are asylum seekers, but when a texan governor sends them to their neighborhoods, something everyone else has been dealing with for decades - they ask the mayor to call in the national guard. Leftists say they are the things they are because they believe it can serve their social expediency and their political agenda. If you truly are a neutral third party like you claim you are - you will understand this and stop defending them as if they are what they claim they are. >Funny how that works, no? I welcome you provide an argument as to why this very thought process would not be possible within the mind of masochistic men from the right. And no, this is not new, leftist women have always had the hots for right wing men, this is a common trope, and it is just a variant of another common trope of women lusting after members of the out group, does Romeo and Juliet ring any bells? Shakespear codes as a genetic leftist in many ways so I wouldn't be surprised if he was exploring out group preferences within the boundaries of the conservative society he lived in through his work subconsciously. Also, I wouldn't say that many or some leftist women always had the hots for rightwing men specifically, just more masculine men than their male counterparts which is an easy enough bar for anyone to clear. Obviously, nowadays a subset of leftist women are exploring political play, but that is for different reasons as I have noted above. >You simply claim this, no proof. The evidence provided shows that rightwing people don't get sexual thrils from moral violations or an 'inversion of morals' as you put it. They experience anger and disgust. The left on the other hand experiences the former, and that is just one more incentive for them to act the way they do. > Maybe Joe the blue collar worker that votes Trump because mexicans are stealing his job is in fact not that pathological, i will grant you Joe doesn't even know anything about porn at all, he might be against it, but the same way there are multiple kind of leftist, there are multiple kinds of rightists. Do you really believe we are talking about Joe here?We are talking about the kinds of people that roam on twitter forcing memes such as Total Nigger Death, the people that spam dead nigger babies to own the libs, I am talking about which group is largely responsible for what we see on this board and which group is not and somehow getting blamed for it as a means of subterfuge. Point taken on how at least some on the right can be pathological though, when I used that word I specifically meant in the sense of sexual gratification. Obviously though, according to my chart , a rightwing person who spends too much time online could be spamming pics of your example in reaction to what he sees as a large moral violation - the inclusion of a racial group in western society he feels is morally corrupt and regressive. Again though, all this does is showcase the pathological differences of how leftists and rightwing people interact in regard to moral violations and the thrust of my argument. > in all honesty, do you really believe someone with a genetic predisposition for iconoclasm and contrarianism will adopt a mainstream leftist stance? There are extreme people like this who swing one way or another based on political climate, and these people tend to be sociopaths. Studies have noted that leftists display more narcissistic tendencies at the moment. Wouldn't be surprised if many sociopaths have grouped with the left since they basically own much of the infrastructure to facilitate political power or moral grandstand which is what sociopaths like to do. Of course, these people are a very small sliver of the population - maybe leftists are naturally more narcissistic, when you develop an ideology to justify why resources gathered or created by other men should instead be redistributed towards you even though you don't pull your own weight then you are displaying very selfish thoughts. >>31186 Nice try. Here is your participation trophy.

>>31188 >It doesn't matter if YOU said that, your opinion about yourself and your political allies is irrelevant as it contradicts the chart I posted so stop trying to do a roundabout and act like I have not posted what I have posted The chart you posted doesn't prove your point though. I have been asking you numerous times how it is that this leftist masochism develops into racial fetishism and you have failed to provide detailed answers. >when you have a sexual pathology and a low inhibition, and when you get pleasure from breaking rules, corrupting the public, committing moral violations - the sorts of things on this board are what you come up with Would you be so kind as to explain why? how? You are just claiming things, no proof. If politics are determined by genetics what would be the use of "spreading" and agenda? In reality, interracial anything is indeed grotesque, the push for interracial couples is one of the "blackpill" propaganda methods most useful for converting people to the right, as it is obvious it is an artificial push, the same thing could be said about the most deranged aspects of bmwf fetishism, which ads to the idea this is a tool for the right. >You are ignoring some of the things I post, misrepresent other things I post Where? If anything you are the one ignoring my points or arguing against the worst possible interpretation. >Stop trying to put up a tough front when you have absolutely nothing but asinine conjecture about your polticial opponents What political opponents? You are insane. I have already told you i am on the right. >tactical retreat mode No, that is called arguing in good faith, have you heard about that? It involves taking into consideration the best possible interpretation of the argument. You are not interested in doing that because you are sensitive about this (words in all caps lmao), it seems it is sensitive topic for you, i wonder why. >when there is a clear history Not at all, this fetish is very recent. If you really believe this you are operating under magical thinking, there is a difference between people saying there is not anything wrong with dating between different races, and claiming there is something wrong with doing that (a racist belief) and that is why you should do it. >hen EVERYONE on this particular board is arguing with me(not coincidental) Paranoid delusions. Talk about mental illness, you are one projection after another. Most people on this board are jerking off and don't care about anything you have to say, if you are asking me to believe you when you say shit like that, you ought to believe me when i tell you i am not a leftist, and no i am not jerking off here neither. >I didn't lie - you're reaching, you don't know why I was searching it up in the first place. I was talking to a nice chat lady this week and she is a different race than me - she wanted me to post some stuff to her, but I don't collect porn so I was doing a quick look around all the porn pic sites. This was obviously the wrong site, but I found a discord so it's all good Come on now, who are you trying to fool. Maybe yourself, but certainly not me. >Obviously there are leftist sheep who don't investigate anything told to them and will genuinely believe anything because they are told to Do you realize, then, how this contradicts your point? Leftist are not a monolithic group, you are aware. >You keep saying you are not a leftist and are now implying you and others are some neutral third party while invoking racial political content into your porn Holy shit you are fucking stupid. It is sarcasm, the point is that there is no neutral party here, thus, there is nobody whose opinion would be influenced by "pushing" the idea right wingers are behind this kind of porn in a board such as this, retard, the point is you are delusional. There is a hundred explanations as for why would anyone support such an idea, one is because they earnestly believe it, but no, out of all possible explanations, the one where the other is malicious is the one you pick, this is the one that lets you sleep at night. You are an open book buddy. >yeah in the context of america or even the west in general that is just a small minority Uh, yes, do you really doubt that? Some are influential, the majority are not. Is this really a controversial take? I welcome you to read what you are saying, you are simply claiming disbelief without daring to providing the shadow of an argument. >You didn't though, you just took a part of the leftist mind and projected it onto the rightwing. The pattern repeats, no argument to be found here. >Everyone has subconscious 'racist' and 'sexist' beliefs Sure, but from that doesn't follow that they ought to believe that an specific race is inferior to another and that having sex with that particular race taints the involved. One post ago you were trying to imply interracial sex for men is okay, you are not consistent. >gleefully fantasize about Trump deporting his Hispanic supporters because diversity didn't fully serve their agenda Your terminally online overgeneralizations are starting to get tiring. This example is a nothingburger, it is air, some people on the left are vindictive, so what? Every ideology has a theory that struggles to get deployed in practice, but adherents of specific ideologies aim to put them in practice even if they are not able to. The problem with communists is not that they are hypocrites or whatever, the problem is that they aim to put their ideology into practice, and starting from the very theory, their ideology is noxious. You are not as smart as you think you are. >If you truly are a neutral third party like you claim you are You are really fucking dumb. >Shakespear codes as a genetic leftist You don't have an ounce of self awareness inside you, do you? > I wouldn't say that "Every woman adores a Fascist". >The evidence provided shows that rightwing people don't get sexual thrils from moral violations or an 'inversion of morals' as you put it. They experience anger and disgust. The left on the other hand experiences the former, and that is just one more incentive for them to act the way they do Taking that for granted, that doesn't demonstrate your point, as i have pointed out numerous times, i am repeating myself at this point. > all this does is showcase the pathological differences of how leftists and rightwing people interact in regard to moral violations and the thrust of my argument Funnily enough, the internet clique known for spamming dead nigger babies are the same ones known for obsessing over the color of dicks and making hundreds of edits with the usual symbolism of this fetish into their memes.

>>31198 >What political opponents? You are insane. I have already told you i am on the right. Ah so you are on the right? I was talking to someone else here who claimed to be a moderate apolitcal while he was posting vaush vids to me- vaush doesn't do anything except leftist politlcal vids. His content is also extremely unhinged at points when it comes to the rightwing - hoping people get raped. Easy to see through that poster. Now YOU are trying an even more moronic routine. You are on the right and let me guess - that is why you peruse this board and defend it's users so gallantly? Like most leftists - all I am seeing is someone who could benefit from universal mental healthcare, but it will have to be on your own dime, not mine. When you talk and act like a leftist you can't claim to be the opposite. It's not going to work, it's just an underhanded tactic. >No, that is called arguing in good faith, So is this. When have you been arguing in good faith, you are not even reading my posts before trying to argue with me - you are trying to make me repeat myself with concern to this >how it is that this leftist masochism develops into racial fetishism I have given sufficient answers about this to others already and it was met little direct response, you can go back and read if you want an answer to that so badly. >Your terminally online overgeneralizations are starting to get tiring. This example is a nothingburger, it is air, some people on the left are vindictive, so what? Every ideology has a theory that struggles to get deployed in practice, but adherents of specific ideologies aim to put them in practice even if they are not able to. The problem with communists is not that they are hypocrites or whatever, the problem is that they aim to put their ideology into practice, and starting from the very theory, their ideology is noxious. You are not as smart as you think you are. You ignored the other examples I posted. I thought you said you were arguing in good faith? Why not address them then? Why skip over them? Maybe because it reveals a pattern among those you are sworn to protect and because you are not doing what you say you are just like you are not what you say you are.

>>31198 >If politics are determined by genetics what would be the use of "spreading" and agenda? In reality, interracial anything is indeed grotesque, the push for interracial couples is one of the "blackpill" propaganda methods most useful for converting people to the right, as it is obvious it is an artificial push, the same thing could be said about the most deranged aspects of bmwf fetishism, which ads to the idea this is a tool for the right. To rally their own people, to get out the vote, to inspire demoralization and intimidation to the other side, to influence people on the fence, some people truly are more apolitical and only vote for the party they feel will best serve them in the very moment. Donald Trump for instance won the popular vote because of voters who voted for him but didn't vote for him in 2020. Though most people can't be swayed - as all past elections have shown - the bulk of the voting public votes in lockstep for their preferred politics almost their entire life which is what creates the notion of red/blue states in the first place. No matter their environment - most people's politics hardly change - for instance florida transitioned from a purple to red state once a good number of baby boomers decided to retire there - they took their politics with them, people didn't change and now some leftists are moving out of florida making it even redder. Environment has only some effect on how extreme someone will be on their side, not what side they are on in their adulthood in the first place. There is stereotype that as people grow older they become more conservative. That isn't true. What people are misinterpreting is the fact that teens and young adults are highly susceptible to influence from their social environment and since every child's environment nowadays is largely leftist groomers or contains leftist authority figures (so was mine) they follow the opinion they are told too, but these past elections are showing leftists that gen-z isn't voting for them in the numbers they hypothesized they would get especially surprising for them considering how much of a stranglehold they have on education and how much they gatekeep out any one to the right of them. What happens is people's opinions on politics gravitate to what their genes, their instincts lead them to. They become their true selves. If environment truly mattered more than genes, the left would have run away with elections a long time ago, everything from education to media to entertainment is full of people pushing leftist opinion but somehow it is still 50-50 on who wins. The left will never truly understand this - they don't believe in genetics to such an extant - they have to believe genes mainly affect appearance and size and what diseases you are susceptible to and little else - or else they would realize how dysgenic they are and how regressive as part of the genepool they really are and how progress will not come from them, but regression - that they are not the idealistic future of humanity. Such an ego death would force them to all commit suicide. So they will keep stupidly trying strategies they think will get them a supermajority that turn out to be an overreach, inspiring resistance among the right and the apolitical - causing them to become petulant and impatient and try to replace native populations with foreigners and inspire those newly arrived with ethnocentrism to rally against native western populations and vote for them. One day they will realize they are also replacing themselves, not just their opponents. Brown and black people are very unlikely to vote for a white passing leftist in local elections if they are a super majority no matter what they offer - they will just vote for a brown or black leftist, but in the shortterm they might vote for a federal president who promises an end to further immigration temporarily if that immigration is hurting them economically like what many did this election.

>>31199 1. Leftoids, if they’re involved in anything sexual, are by and large fans of BDSM which is why Kink at Pride is such a common discourse topic for them, why BDSM porn Network Kink.com is headquartered in San Francisco, and a lot of Feminist girlboss women are into super rough sex since that’s how they let loose. They simply don’t see the point in swinging unless there’s a queer element involved (no focus on race though, communists and socialists hate overt racism) and they avoid any interracial fetishism unless it’s a woman of color wanting to be submissive. Leftoids also hate BBC Fetishism because they and their racial activist allies see it as degrading towards Black Men. This lead to a lot of snowbunnies who tried to bring up their kink at the George Floyd Protests getting booted out of the movement within the 1st day or 2 (I remember progressives on Twitter being pissed off about it). 2. Rightoids are the ones who engage with swinging and cuckoldry the most because it goes against family values. Prime examples of this are Marjorie Taylor Greene being in a throuple (while a Democratic House Rep had to resign for being in one), Televangelist Pastor and Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr having to resign for cuckoldry (he enjoyed letting the poolboy bang his wife in front of him) and swinging, and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities.

>>29741 self-harm is the whole point of this fetish you're simply in denial.

>>31199 >Ah so you are on the right? I was talking to someone else We have ids, you can see which posts are mine and which posts are not, are you an AI? Also why are you dividing your posts? You realize this is not 4cuck right? >that is why you peruse this board and defend it's users so gallantly? Who is defending users? Can you please look at my id and point towards an instance of me defending any user here? I am simply defending my point, you are so desperate and pathetic i almost pity you. >all I am seeing is someone who could benefit from universal mental healthcare Are you watching a mirror? Maybe your screen is turned off, turn it on. A couple of posts ago you were talking about how porn is a leftists thing, now you are acting all uppity even though you came here looking for porn, stop being such an hypocritical faggot and have some humility. >I have given sufficient answers No you have not, you are simply giving studies that don't support your point and leading questions intended to hide the fact there is a leap in within your logic, as i have repeatedly pointed out. >You ignored the other examples I posted Instead of shitting your pants and whining like a baby about me ignoring your examples you should point out how it is that your other examples are important to the matter at hand, it is my opinion that they are not, and they all are answered with the quote you are greentexting. A quote that you don't even address funnily enough. >To rally their own people, to get out the vote, to inspire demoralization and intimidation to the other side Are you reading the text you are quoting? Are you really trying to imply people in this board are trying to sway people into voting left? How deluded can you be? >Though most people can't be swayed - as all past elections have shown Americans are insufferable. The rest of your rambles are inconsequential to the discussion and would have some value if you were not a downie and fetishist in denial trying to cope your way out of this board.

>>31227 >Rightoids are the ones who engage with swinging and cuckoldry the most because it goes against family values. Prime examples of this are Marjorie Taylor Greene being in a throuple (while a Democratic House Rep had to resign for being in one), Televangelist Pastor and Liberty University President Jerry Falwell Jr having to resign for cuckoldry (he enjoyed letting the poolboy bang his wife in front of him) and swinging, and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities. Following your logic, this would make leftists more likely to be into racial bnwo style porn because on the surface they uphold racial equality/equity as a main pillar to justify the righteousness of their cause and bnwo goes against such values and implicitly villianizes black males as a regression of western society and values instead of progress.. Since racial fetishizers keep turning up at blm type rallies, certainly a lefty thing they are trying to keep in secrecy. Obviously though, both the right and left mind work differently in how they perceive breaking what society teaches are moral violations(brain scans can detect what politics you support) - I like that you brought up jerry falwell since that was such a scandal because that is not a normal or acceptable thing amongst those circles. Shortly afterwards, he was essentially ousted from campus and banned, and then sued. Of course, jerry falwell says what the pool said was made up and his wife had an affair and cheated on him implying he was not a cuck, and he was blackmailed instead, but most likely that is a lie. If he was in leftist circles it would not be a big scandal, he would just be made fun of by the right just like that famous leftist youtuber Destiny who is also a cuckold. Imagine someone like Joe Rogan being found to have such a relationship with his wife, the right would drop him in a second, he wouldn't last long enough to release another episode. It just couldn't happen - one is acceptable on one side and not the other. On swinging ... eh the left pushes polyamory pretty hard in publications as they do cuckoldry. Leftists partake in cuckoldry so much they (especially at their filthy communes) created something they call 'compersion' where one partner(usually the male) enters such a spiritual state of bliss and empathy for his partner partaking in sex with another partner(usually another man) that he feels what she feels and so while he is in the chair in the corner in his own leftist view he is partaking in sex though it seems a little gay to want to spiritually connect and feel a girlfriend who is having sex with another man, but leftist males are more sexually fluid than most men so eh. Leftist have always been into cuckoldry, bnwo is an extension of that now since they place racial politics on a much higher level than economic politics nowadays. And the left has a hard time separating any of their social politics from degenerative fetishization. As for bdsm, do they push that? Yes, but with a big focus on empowering women through what they call femdom. Hell, nowadays there is dom/sub political play onlyfans where a dominatrix plays a maga women and tortures the lefty male sub into supporting/voting trump. It is a huge hit among leftists. The left has their finger in every kink you can think of but with their own degenerate spin on things. The right built western civilization and all of it's pillars by hand and mind. Pillars that the left did not build and now try to tear down or in the name of 'combating oppression'(seizing power) and now also fetishize into degeneration - western prestige, western economic power, western families, western masculinity. The right has clearly not been oppressive or responsible enough if these degenerates are allowed to flourish in society. At least red states now are putting age limits on porn so younger people don't accidentally stumble upon leftist mental illness such as this board. Liberalism was a nice experiment, but without genetic screening - the left will continue to exist in the western genepool, and so it can not continue without that liberalism being used against the native populace. >>31233 You are getting really boring. You whine that you are repeating yourself, but you go out of your way to essentially post the same things over and over. Whiny little one sentence responses that try to nitpick but just make you look obtuse and dumber in the end and weak for ignoring the huge parts of replies that are too inconvenient for you - responses not able to offer any logical counter points - starting to see you are limited and you might just be a truly simple mind creature with the brain the size of a peanut. Also, this little charade where you pretend to be on the right while arguing with someone on the right about how it is not the left who are pushing cuckoldry/bwno, but the right is beyond silly. And then you say you are arguing in 'good fatih' on top of that while doing all of the above. Tsk tsk. No actual rightwing person would invest so much time, energy, emotion into trying to protect the image of the left especially when there is too much evidence to argue against. Face it, you are just a typical slimy leftist possibly tranny.diarrheaing word vomit all over the boards. Take a breath and then get a new hobby or start posting something of substance that I or anyone can actually reply to.

>>31227 >1. Leftoids, if they’re involved in anything sexual, are by and large fans of BDSM which is why Kink at Pride is such a common discourse topic for them, why BDSM porn Network Kink.com is headquartered in San Francisco, and a lot of Feminist girlboss women are into super rough sex since that’s how they let loose. They simply don’t see the point in swinging unless there’s a queer element involved (no focus on race though, communists and socialists hate overt racism) and they avoid any interracial fetishism unless it’s a woman of color wanting to be submissive. Leftoids also hate BBC Fetishism because they and their racial activist allies see it as degrading towards Black Men. This lead to a lot of snowbunnies who tried to bring up their kink at the George Floyd Protests getting booted out of the movement within the 1st day or 2 (I remember progressives on Twitter being pissed off about it). Leftists say they stand for lots of things, but very rarely partake in what they idealize. For instance, a racially diverse society? Leftists tend to avoid living in asian, hispanic or black neighborhoods, always voluntarily segregating themselves and schools their children go to while at the same time preaching everyone else to live amongst the same people in the neighborhoods they avoid. Supporting refugees? Leftists want americans to let in anyone who claims asylum, but when those supposed asylum seekers come to their neighborhoods they call the police or the mayor to get them out. Multiracial democracy? Right after the election - leftists fantasized about trump deporting any hispanic who voted for him so they can't vote republican again, at their most emotionally distraught they revealed how fake they are. They support the things on the surface they feel will empower their agenda of taking over america, of shifting the overton window to their favor. of eliminating any criticism to their position in society. Also, side note - on the topic of lies - right or the left - what politics you support is in part influenced by your hormone levels, not just genes. Studies show that men with healthier or above average hormone levels of testosterone support more right leaning politics. People with higher testosterone are also more likely to be truthful and less evasive. Leftist males are more likely to be born with less prenatal testosterone. Explains their cucky behavior and the abundance of trannies on the left. All of the above somewhat explains both men and women and the rates of their lying and the rates of deceit among both the left and the right. The leftist(soviet) playbook is all about using deceit to win political power.

>>31227 >and the various news stories about Conservative HOA Board Members being in charge of swinger clubs and use HOA facilities for their after hours activities. Can I see these? The elderly in general seem to partake in swinging on occasion and HOA is fully of elderly. Something about long drawn out marriages tend to make some people antsy for something different. Ideally this wouldn't happen, but at least it is not too degenerate like leftist cuckoldry is. Especially bnwo style cuckoldry that the left and their trannies want to force everyone to see.

>>31242 >Tsk tsk

>>31243 This one is comedy gold because you could have presented this theory at first but you didn't, meaning you came up with this on the spot, meaning you are still thinking of ways to defend the point you want to defend instead of following the truth, meaning as i diagnosed in my first post, your cringe persona is just an elaborate cope and there is nothing good faith about you. The most obvious thing about you is the fact you keep returning to this thread and making posts in this board. You excuse was that you just had to search for interracial porn (and porn is a leftist thing remember) just a different kind of interracial porn despite the fact everyone knows the very specific kind of porn housed in this board.You literally only needed to use google images lmao. And well, you didn't find that kind of porn, you can't argue for shit and each thing you say gives more credit to the obvious idea you are a fetishist in denial. Why are you still here?

>>31243 Just passing by to say that your point on leftists not practicing what they preach is ONE way to look at it, but the boring reality is that they're faced with the cognitive dissonance (i.e. a decently well-researched part of behaviorism, unlike your random claims) of their opinions versus their experiences. Even if they're technically delusional via opinion, they're relatively high enough in intelligence to realize what's happening in front of them and to avoid it. That's just self-preservation by nature, which you can't physically/mentally fight. The only difference is that they're scared to say "hey guys actually" to their little echochambers because we all know what happens when you deviate from the extremism on that spectrum by even one percentile. btw, projection (despite the buzzword connotation nowadays) is another actual psychological phenomenon that's been extensively studied by people far smarter than you or me. That was the whole basis of the other person's argument - people who *obsess* with a very specific topic (NWO/White Replacement/Violent muh dick niggers) tend to be the same ones who indulge. Churches/purity - school/education for both sides of the spectrum when it comes to pedophelia statistics and domination over social weaklings, for example. There's no arguing against that, so I don't even know how this has went for so long when you're just denying reality lol Lastly, another key factor for projection is that it's important to attribute it strictly onto groups with pre-existing psychological conditions, such as paranoics (1:1 definition of modern-day right wingers) and narcissists (kinda broad, but a direct example is trannies/flamboyant gays being obsessed with kids/school receptiveness while having strong pedophilic tendencies) As >>31249 said, it's actually comical how you're exhibiting the exact same cognitive dissonance as a RWer on an interracial board arguing that it's dominated by LWers with some delusional cope that you're right solely because leftists=degenerates is all the 'evidence' you need lmfao

>>31242 Joe rogan already has heat from having a half black daughter (his wives) and people like this and noones kicked out influencers and pornstars like these >>28439 >>31242

>>31249 >>31263 >>31268 I see I have the attention of a great many leftists on these boards(more than several of you posted me so far) and now a great rousing of dunning-kruger effect has developed among you leftists. On one point brought up- why did i not bring up hormonal differences between rightwing men and lefitst males before? Simple, i didn't feel it was needed for the previous discussion of why leftists participate in and create bnwo style porn. Why all of you do the things you do. Since your repeated behaviors of lying and manipulation - trying to act like you participate in good faith while at the same time saying you are someone you are not while at the same time while trying your hardest to defend leftists in various ways such as leftists not being aware of white replacement while they brag about it on their talk shows or media posts - while they popularized a 19th century phrase for modern politics and pitched their tent around it's implications - a roundabout way of saying they aren't aware of themes of bnwo, so could not have possible created all the content. After all of this repeated behavior it was relevant I bring up why many leftists(including yourselves) lie so much and it really goes back to how the subconscious monitors many biological parameters of the body and influence a survival strategy for the conscious mind through instinctual feelings - a way for a person to navigate through any physical or social dangers while they attempt to acquire resources they perceive they need to survive. In the ancient period especially during the times of hunter/gatherers this was a must. Since leftist males tend to be less physically developed compared to their political counterparts - they have to use manipulation to gain what they want(power and influence to access the resources they want). They have to argue distributions practices in the tribe, on how the strong hunters should provide for everyone, not just themselves and their families - while they sit back and coordinate the 'sharing' of these resources. In modern times - they argue this as 'from each according to their ability, to each according to their needs'. They keep up the same exact rhetoric, and now they have a foothold and are scared of the right winning political power and ending the gravy train for all leftists enriching themselves on tax payers dime. Of course, politics is a mess, and politicians - all politicians are more left than their constituents, so little progress will be made unless outsiders - like rebellious billionaires from this administration who don't care for the embezzling charades other billionaires partake in - just want lower taxes and less restriction for growing their business challenge the status quo, but I digress How does the above mentioned fit into why you people keep lying about who you are as an attempt to mislead who is behind the content these boards? Just as simple, the apparent amount of leftists on these boards would clue one in to who is oiling this whole degenerate coombrained operation. The right has been calling you guys degenerate since the days of marx himself - this attack has always pricked your sense of self in relation to your ascendance in influence and how it relates to progress of western society. The problem for you guys attempting this subterfuge is that all of you are here for a specific and very apparent reason - this fetish unlocks something within you - you like getting off on the desecration of western purity - in this case White women and White families. The added effect of White women naturally presenting an air of purity simply through their lighter coloration(even though the amount of porn of all flavors would show otherwise) is a bonus for you. The chart in this post correlates well enough with the other chart I posted to make some inferences. With both charts it is easy to see that rightwing people value purity much higher than leftists; which side-note , is why leftists are more open-minded to all things by the way even many degenerate things. Much of the right values purity, much of the left doesn't, the left uses this to accuse the rightwing of being 'oppressive' or 'discriminating' for an opportunistic reasons while at the same time they want to get their jollies off in the way all disgusting leftist creatures do and so they go for interracial/bnwo, use that as a cudgel to break down western purity and as the previous charts show unlike rightwingers - they get off on that so they create porn out of it. Such a malmutated part of the genepool can't help itself - so a part of the right gets angry at the left desecrating the purity they built and now try to maintain and the left has always been attacked for lowering of moral standards and so leftists self-conscious of their ideology on these boards certainly don't want morbidly curious lurkers coming here and seeing them for what they are - posting their participation on the other side of the internet to mock them - so they pretend they are rightwingers, neutral third party, or that rightwingers are the ones creating all this and they are just conveniently perusing it all. Maybe they even use these lies to cope with what they are deep down and bury it. Neutral third parties don't get off on this, research and evidence shows rightwingers don't get off on this, they get angry, this is a typical degenerative leftist thing. You can't argue that. There is no argument you can put forth, or have put forth to counteract what has been shown and explained. You all will put on willful face of puzzlement or bemusement to keep from revealing you have little to offer in logical pushback. As for cognitive dissonance being the only reason for why the left lie so much - that they are just confused, they are just bleeding hearts who don't know well enough. Well history would show differently, especially recent history with how they called for defundment of police while they paid for private security. Espousing that the police are an oppressive force and how they are not needed, how there is little actual crime and how it is all rightwing propaganda while at the same time increasing their payment for their own security, because they know what will happen to the public. Such manipulation, such wickedness displayed. The truth is they are just opportunistic perverted leeches. On the last note, the reasons why I say the left here is projecting is in combination with the charts provided and with nature of the rhetoric they use to try and convince me that the right catalogued all of this porn on this board. The left is saying that a person who values something deeply enough will in turn fetishize the inverse of those values or the elimination of those values. They say since the right values family and ethnic purity and masculinity -they want the opposite sexually deep down. An inconvenience for leftists is that research shows THEY get off on the moral violation of what values they or others hold dear. The left are unaware that the right experiences feelings different than them and expresses sexuality differently than them, so when i have people on these boards coming up to me and saying that people who hold things dear eventually fetishize them so this is all the right - they don't understand what they are revealing to me about themselves. The nature of their logic is a projection of a leftist onto a rightwinger, a gap in understanding of how both rightwingers and leftists experiencing sexuality and how the right does not fetishize what it or others hold dear unlike the left.

>>31271 Leftist dont make BNWO porn RIightwingers make it, leftist post it

>>31271 >>31271 so at this point my only explanation for you being so dense is that you're one of those right wingers, which actually unironically had themselves brainwashed by this fetish (most likely due to dangerously low IQ) and now you're genuinely buying into the whole "leftists are banding together to turn me gay, better go into the interracial board on the daily so I can tell them their tricks wont work on me!!!!!" even when talking to obvious centrists >Neutral third parties don't get off on this, research and evidence shows rightwingers don't get off on this, they get angry hmmm wonder what the strongest human emotion is hmmm wonder how fetishes tend to get developed? the fucking bible which you probably pretend to follow, references that too btw >the whole wordsalad about cognitive dissonance and police defundment??? actual schizophrenic ramblings, get yourself together. over half the leftists statistically are poor as shit, you're actually living in lala land where the leftist contingent is somehow all cramped in Hollywood, SF and NYC or some shit? >The left is saying that a person who values something deeply enough will in turn fetishize the inverse of those values or the elimination of those values. It's not the left saying that, it's behavioral science. I'm sure you've studied the matter in much deeper depth though, gooning ur mind off some lowtier splitscreen edit or whatever >An inconvenience for leftists is that research shows THEY get off on the moral violation of what values they or others hold dear. Brother, if you think that's what we're doing then we've already won. I repeat, you're a proud right winger checking on the interracial board on a niche site like 8chan daily. every single one of us here already knows you beat your meat to this, there's nothing more for this invisible threat to win from your existence dipshit. Here, let me get your peepee hard - you've already lost. It's so cringe when porn addicts try to be coherent and even philosphical about political intricacies, actual bottom of the barrel dude who likely funnels 20% of his paycheck to onlyfans whores. Fuck, I'd bet on it, considering how you've brought them up completely unprompted in like 4 different replies already :)

>>31281 >>31283 >so at this point my only explanation for you being so dense is that you're one of those right wingers, which actually unironically had themselves brainwashed by this fetish (most likely due to dangerously low IQ) and now you're genuinely buying into the whole "leftists are banding together to turn me gay, better go into the interracial board on the daily so I can tell them their tricks wont work on me!!!!!"even when talking to obvious centrists You know I see right through you right? If I'm the one with low IQ then why can't you or the other leftists argue against what has been shown and explained. Why weak attempts at misdirection? For instance - >hmmm wonder what the strongest human emotion is You accuse me of being dense yet you ignore different emotions experienced by rightwingers and leftists seeing moral standards being tarnished as shown in the research provided. hmmm wonder how fetishes tend to get developed? the fucking bible which you probably pretend to follow, references that too btw For leftists? Research easily shows how fetishes develop among leftists. Same research shows why gen z leftist women nowadays get off on rightwing men dominating them when previous generations of leftists in america didn't before. >actual schizophrenic ramblings, get yourself together. over half the leftists statistically are poor as shit, you're actually living in lala land where the leftist contingent is somehow all cramped in Hollywood, SF and NYC or some shit? Anything you find you have a hard time arguing you just dismiss. It's not clever like you think. I can see right through it. Also, of course many of leftists are poor - it doesn't mean that many of them aren't sheep which is why they support leftist millionaire activists arguments for lax standards on criminal prosecution and punishment when they would over and over experience the consequences of such. >It's not the left saying that, it's behavioral science. I'm sure you've studied the matter in much deeper depth though, gooning ur mind off some lowtier splitscreen edit or whatever The left does say that - not just here - but in general. >Brother, if you think that's what we're doing then we've already won. I repeat, you're a proud right winger checking on the interracial board on a niche site like 8chan daily. every single one of us here already knows you beat your meat to this, there's nothing more for this invisible threat to win from your existence dipshit. Here, let me get your peepee hard - you've already lost. I have explained what brought me here already. Why am I still posting? Because I have not been able to engage in a debate in a good long while. Leftists, slimy cowards that they are tend to be ban all debate that they can't tilt in their favor on sites like reddit. 4chan, the threads only last a day at most before being locked. Here I found is the first chance I have had in a long time to explore and debate with leftists how they feel and experience things. I see that there is little self-awareness and meta-cognition performed by leftists. They don't understand themselves, much less their opposition. They flood the social sciences which should eventually help them figure out such, but instead mainly use it for propaganda purposes on their own end. > >Fuck, I'd bet on it, considering how you've brought them up completely unprompted in like 4 different replies already :) It seems there is much lost on you. I have some leftists posting onlyfan grifters as evidence of rightwing while at the same time in the same pics they are showing me the backlash they experience from any rightwing fan who discovers how many fetishes they sell. If backlash exists from one side - it is obvious that that side doesn't want what the grifter is selling and the other side does. > It's so cringe when porn addicts try to be coherent and even philosphical about political intricacies Yes it is, you should actually try to counteract my points, instead you post an income chart in regards to something I never disputed. A flimsy attempt of making it look like you have anything of substance on your side, how embarrassed I am for you. May your next try be better, or else you are just wasting your time.

>>31284 >You accuse me of being dense yet you ignore different emotions experienced by rightwingers and leftists seeing moral standards being tarnished as shown in the research provided. yeah, I ignore temporary acute emotions and tend to focus on chronic emotional states in order to predict/judge character, correct. You should too, if you knew the slightest bit about human behavior AND sociology. >Same research shows why gen z leftist women nowadays get off on rightwing men dominating them when previous generations of leftists in america didn't before. I agree. Wonder what that could be caused by? Surely nothing to do with the rapidly rising political division (in practice ca. 2016 but technically 2011/12, following Occupy Wall Street) where both sides are leaning on teaching vehement hate/disgust toward the other, right? Surely you're gonna get it and stop arguing for me? >Yes it is, you should actually try to counteract my points, instead you post an income chart in regards to something I never disputed. Good you cleared that up, I'm glad we're in agreeance that your ramblings trying to dispute my initial argument about RW cognitive dissonance, are just that - ramblings of a madman trying to fight some shadowy cabal and ignoring the point at hand entirely. Leftists blindly following elites on false pretenses is the exact same thing as right wingers voting Trump and supporting Elon - nothing to do with cognitive dissonance and everything to do with simple ignorance and well-meaning naivety, both basic human traits. You don't know what the most popular buzzwords even mean, my friend. >The left does say that - not just here - but in general. Incredible counter-argument, bravo Listen, I'm not even American. An Eastern European who generally hates jews, arabs, indians, and nigs in any non-fantasy scenario. I'm just trying to underline once again that you're not arguing against someone who's targeting your kind - I hate leftists for being beta fags just as much, if not more. IMO - them being THE existing real-life white contingent of passive and pathetic "males", as displayed in a lot of great BNWO content, is a large part of what makes this fetish a bit more realistic and subsequently hotter. You can take that as me conceding that leftists are indeed A targeted/significant community within the fetish, but definitely not the driving force of it. My actual opinion is that we're very close to 50/50 and this is a meaningless argument, but the horrific jeet influx of the 2020s is muddying the waters and making it harder to call. Anyways, thanks for at least genuinely being vapid enough to not hide your detailed mental process - I've already drawn my conclusions about you as a human being and have decided that it's incredibly pointless for this argument to continue because you keep resorting to the "this is true because I told you so" bit. Which, funnily enough, is straight out of the "right winger traits 101" book. Like, page 1, first paragraph, third sentence. Leftists tend to squirm differently, so it was a fun case study pushing around an actual facebook-tier NPC with surface-level knowledge of anything they try to argue over (which isn't intellectually far from the reddit leftists either tbh). As a final sincere non-ad-hoc message from me to you >I have explained what brought me here already. obv I don't know you personally, but I'd assume you genuinely have a condition where you have trouble reading the room and social cues. You physically cannot formulate a valid argument for daily visiting a hardcore interracial fetish forum, even if it really does boil actually down to "just wanna have unfiltered arguments" somehow. Just for 30 seconds in your head - imagine explaining that to a complete normie who jacks off to xhamster amateur pov porn like 3x/week; what's 8chan, what's /interracial/, what you do there, and how you'd think they'd perceive that information. It'd be like an early Christmas present for me to see a rationalization of that conversation from someone like you, totally isolated from our argument. I don't doubt your beliefs and intentions here at all, but I do doubt your resolve that you're somehow different from the other RWers in the fetish and you won't be back to helplessly tugging your dick to some very specific humiliation vid/caption that itches you just right. I've also had my doubts that part of the reason you're even into arguing about this, despite all the random personal attacks at you, is to gather mental baggage until you can finally let go and give in again, maybe think of an argument or two mentioned here for that extra edge. Shot in the dark, and you could easily argue projection, but imagine if I'm right lol >captcha fed388

Holy moly that is a lot of text

>>31299 >yeah, I ignore temporary acute emotions and tend to focus on chronic emotional states in order to predict/judge character, correct. You should too, if you knew the slightest bit about human behavior AND sociology. All the porn you and others keep posting in this board shows your chronic emotional state. You guys can't help yourselves, even when you are trying to 'debate' me hahaha. Then you blame it on the right, because you know how bad it looks for one side to be so pathological about this shit. The left has always preyed on the right and their White families and children. More and more of the right is realizing this and is finally fighting back and is making you leftists screech . > Good you cleared that up, I'm glad we're in agreeance that your ramblings trying to dispute my initial argument about RW cognitive dissonance Your initial argument was flimsy and thin based on a false pretense of why I am here, and now you are trying to force the issue that I am some how in agreement with you, so you can tell yourself you have been successful in a debate you stumbled into like a clumsy kid with down-syndrome and didn't know how to contend with. Almost everyone one of your sentences is wish fulfillment of who I am personally without any logical reasoning to pushback against what I am saying. You can't dispute what I say, you can only attack the imaginary person in your head. The cognitive dissonance you are experiencing in trying to convince yourself you are succeeding at this while at the same time your bad-faith tactics and your unrelenting leftist fetish of posting degenerate porn at me to get me angry shows deep down you know you can't contend with the logic put in front of you. Research shows that many more Leftists truly are mentally ill than both the right and the apolitical, and I am seeing it right here in front of me. And before you say again, oh I am not a leftist - I only debate,defend the left, and post porn like a leftist so you are the one doing what you accuse me of. Well, walk like a duck,talk like a duck, pathologically stashes and catalogues bnwo porn like a degenerate duck, probably one fucked up duck yeah. In many ways you are a typical leftist, but one who is also a little self-conscious about how unmasculine the left is and how that reflects on you, so you try to keep from thinking you are, but deep down inside you act and perceive the world exactly like they do, It's genetic. You are displaying it here full-heartedly for everyone here to see, you can't dispute it. >You physically cannot formulate a valid argument for daily visiting a hardcore interracial fetish forum, even if it really does boil actually down to "just wanna have unfiltered arguments" somehow. Just for 30 seconds in your head - imagine explaining that to a complete normie who jacks off to xhamster amateur pov porn like 3x/week; what's 8chan, what's /interracial/, what you do there, and how you'd think they'd perceive that information. It'd be like an early Christmas present for me to see a rationalization of that conversation from someone like you, totally isolated from our argument. If I explained to someone I found a degenerate board and I debated a bunch of leftist coomers who are into a sick twisted fetish, and all they could do is say 'no u' and post a bunch of their stashed porn at me - he would probably laugh. Can you guys explain what the hell you guys are doing though without people giving you disturbed glares? Definitely not. >As a final sincere non-ad-hoc message from me to you Tactical retreat. Come on, you and other leftists are so hellbent on forcing a narrative that the right is the one creating this here and not you guys. I came here to debate and see if what you say is true, I wanted you guys to prove it to me. All you have shown me is the typical projection of the left onto the right in regards to how fetishes develop and when that line of projected reasoning proved very faulty because of how differently the rightwing and leftist mind work(brain-scans can show what politics you support) - you amounted to 'well, why are you here, you must like this stuff' and that's all you got it seems. I will say though - at least YOU tried a little, and I will give you a tiny bit of credit for that. Your angle was on cognitive dissonance on the left and the right - of course all you did with that was to try to relate that to me and why I am here - you didn't do much with it, and then you posted an income chart that did not contend with anything I had said previously as a last resort, but still - at least you tried a little which is more than every other leftist here I just debated with. A very low bar to clear, enough for a toddler to hope over, but still. Credit where credit is due. .

>>31301 He looks like Elliot kek. Incel Asian Chad phenotype lel.

>>31326 Both half white thats the wasian phenotype

>>31301 Where are people getting the schizo theory that Eurasian Tiger is behind bbc cuck posting from? The redpill comics he was known for making were all about how women just want white "Chad" and never had anything to do with bbc.

The reality is that it's a silly fetish that works better as fantasy than in reality. Most women are not obsessed with BBC and the logistics of finding black men to fuck your girl are actually kind of annoying and make the whole thing not hot. The longer you are into this kind of thing, the sillier it seems and so there's not much of a future in it unless you luck out and find a woman who actually goes along with it and stays with you.

>>31324 Dude, y’all have arguing over this shit for almost a week now. Just drop it and move the fuck on. It’s not that big of a deal. Also, if this is a Leftist fetish as you keep insisting on, then why the fuck are their no black women in any of these conversations? The Left literally worships the ground black women walk on and they never get brought up in relation to this stuff and men on the left have no issues with dating a black woman if the opportunity presents itself. Instead, y’all are worshiping white women as the pinnacle of beauty which westerners have been doing for decades. That’s exactly why so many people who are waware of this stuff identify it as a right wing kink. Add in the obvious right wing antisemitism from this websites other boards and it’s obvious which side of the political aisle is pushing this stuff more than anyone else.

>>31356 One, you have to go back and read the posts to understand things. Especially what bnwo is actually all about in the leftist mind. Then you will understand that black women have absolute nothing to do with leftist bnwo in any way. Also, that's funny, you ask people on the right and they would say that the left worship black men more than the women. Also, isn't it only the intersectional feminism part of the left that pushes black women's voice at all? You don't see leftist males or almost anyone 'worshiping' them or putting them in the spotlight as you put it. They are not a group of people that are easy to 'worship' per say. >Add in the obvious right wing antisemitism from this websites other boards and it’s obvious which side of the political aisle is pushing this stuff more than anyone else. The left know that most things the right talks is true and dares them to talk about it, so they can get them in trouble. Don't think the left knows about jews? See tiktok vids about palestine and israel and you will see many of them know how entrenched jews are at the top of many influential industries in western society. Just because the left makes a big deal about never percieving any differences of race or gender on the surface. One thing I haven't seen the left here address at all is the absolute hilarious amount of leftist male trannies that participate in bnwo, they can't help but put themselves into the porn. How do you address that in your bid to blame the right for everything that the left created here on this board?

>>31356 > Instead, y’all are worshiping white women as the pinnacle of beauty which westerners have been doing for decades. That’s exactly why so many people who are waware of this stuff identify it as a right wing kink. You really need to go back and read the posts. You are arguing exactly what the other leftists who were debating me were arguing. The exact same line of thought, and when I showed them evidence of how fetishes develop differently in rightwing and leftist mind and how this line of thinking of theirs is projection of their own way of thinking onto the right - they found out they had a hard time disputing it, they relented and turned around in the only way their egos would allow. If you are not a leftist, then you will in good faith read the posts before addressing this again.

>>31350 Bro, stop trying so hard to downplay it. It may not be BNWO tier, but there are a lot of women that are fantasizing about bbc. Even on legitimate swinger websites you have people making posts complaining about how many women want bbc on there and how it's harder for non black guys to get matches. And on the swinger subreddit there are lots of butthurt posts complaining about how common bbc queen of spades stuff is in the lifestyle. And these aren't posts from guys getting horny about the idea. It's legitimate couples who are hyper liberal and are shaming everyone else for all the race "fetishism" that they see. Like pic attached. And the funny thing about the examples that I posted are that people complaining about the prevalent interracial scene are in very liberal, educated areas, which people in this thread were arguing wouldn't be as into that as right wing places.

>>31370 Swingers in more rural and conservative regions near a big city will commonly go to said big city for a weekend to indulge in their kinks/fetishes. I should know as someone who grew up in a historically GOP-Purple region of California near The Bay Area and the swingers in my hometown did this all the damn time. What you’re seeing from these posts are the left wing swingers and polyamorous crowd that actually live in those big cities and nearby suburbs getting annoyed at all the Trump voting racial fetishists from the surrounding countryside.

>>31369 >>31284 lmao what of grifters getting backlash? these conservative pornstars are mainastream and well established

>>31382 >conservative pornstars You are the moron in oxymoron

>>31381 That sounds more like something you made up on the spot than anything else lol. Anyway, it's easy to see what leftists are into with the research posted and why so many leftist males are into this kind of stuff.

>>31370 Some women have a preference, but most don't care or are unattracted to black men. I WISH women were into BBC and would go down the pipeline of fucking them as much as I wanted, but my experience has been that they don't. A swinger site is more populated with cuckold porn addicts than normal people, so more BBC references will be made. But I like the idea of the average woman getting addicted to BBC, but they generally aren't outside of appeasing their partner.

>>31384 look in the mirror who hires pornstars to fuck again? >>31385 denial is not just a river in egypt >>31385