>>71529 >It was used by people to make fun of morons in the same context as the dipshits who came up with the term okay boomer' Except I never said that. >Finally, we arrive at 'It was used endlessly with videos making fun of progressives throwing a pissy fit, but it stopped being funny after the first week AND the real term is salt mining and normal people don't use cringe to describe those compilations despite the fact that the term has seen consistent and continuous use". Doesn't it show the weakness of your argument when you have to put words in my mouth that I never said?

>>71532 >put words in my mouth that I never said >>71523 >>71525 Anon, we call it paraphrasing.

>>71533 >we call it paraphrasing By making a longer post than what I actually said?

>>71534 By combining your statements into one? Yes. Would you rather my post have been: If I'm understanding this correctly. We've gone from 'Because the ONLY people who I see unironically and literally using words like "cringe" are Progressives. No else talks like that. It equivalent to how you can tell the difference a Canadian and an American by how they pronounce words like Toronto' to ">the usage of cringe online started with people making fun of morons online You mean the very same idiots who started the "Okay, boomer" meme?'. Finally, we arrive at 'You mean the endless vids of Progressive screaming at the top of their lungs because they don't get their way? That stuff stopped being funny after the first week, especially when they've been doing it in everywhere, from public square to literal senate hearings, have been doing it nonstop for the past decade. Also, normal people still never used words like "cringe" to describe those compilations. It was always referred to as salt mining." Because I can certainly start doing that, if that's what you want.

>>71535 >Yes. So you have no argument and have to make one out of thin air in order to defend your point? On top of showing that you have zero ability to understand how an imageboard works. Who's the newfag in this scenario?

>>71536 I don't think I've called anyone a newfag, or implied I frequent boards often. I just wasn't sure if you were over the age of 18 considering you aren't aware of common language and online trends. This is all especially moot when an anon who presumably the guy you threw a hissy fit over has come out and said he isn't into dipshit progressive crap.

For fuck sakes, can we stop just ranting about shit that people aren't even talking about. This is the third thread I've seen where someone brings up something and then someone else has to start shit becuse they see a hidden message that wasn't their to being with. All these messages over someone saying "non-cringe race play". They were adding on to the discussion, not trying to start shit. I don't even know how you can believe those words would indicate their beliefs and then claim it as a "Progressive mindset" on a fucking fetish board talking about their fetish. He isn't saying he wants a black dude to cuck him for equality or some shit like that.

>>71537 >I just wasn't sure if you were over the age of 18 considering you aren't aware of common language and online trends. I'm sorry but I have a life, with bills to pay and shit to do. I don't see it as productive nor beneficial to care about that latest drama over what some jackass said on Twatter, or the latest Titkok challenge that retards are doing. >>71538 >This is the third thread I've seen where someone brings up something and then someone else has to start shit becuse they see a hidden message that wasn't their to being with. Where do you think you are? >I don't even know how you can believe those words would indicate their beliefs Because the words and terms you use in conversation DO indicate your own beliefs and lifestyle.

>>71542 >because I am better than you kill yourself

>>71544 >I am better than you How did you get that out of my saying that I'm too busy for social media?

>>71542 >drama over what some jackass said on Twatter, or the latest Titkok challenge that retards are doing How exactly did we get to that from only progressive people use the word cringe?

>>71546 >anon1 expresses his kinks >anon2 you should be ashamed of your kinks! >convo devolves

>>71542 >I'm sorry but I have a life, with bills to pay and shit to do. Then why are you on here starting stupid arguments?

>>71542 Where do you think you are? You're on a fetish board. You're the only guy here making it political, and people are sick of it. 90% of this board is about vore, sharing pictures of vore, things similar to vore and talking about vore, you think this is fucking 4chan or some rage bait baord but it's literley just a fetish board for vore. Your arguments are as bad as those people who think art is political. You see something that could link to an argument and focus on that one detail rather than any other part of the conversation. I don't care, and I doubt anyone but you cares about your or anyone else's beliefs on this thread or 90% of threads. This is a thread about opinions on vore and discussions on vore, not about how retarded you think people are. So please, just shut the fuck up and take it somewhere else. Make a thread for this shit rather then derailing this or any thread. Or better yet, go to Off Topic; that is what it was made for.

>>71547 >you should be ashamed of your kinks When is this never NOT a rule to live by, if your kinks are anything more than pregnancy and sex in the missionary position for the purposes of procreation? >>71549 >Where do you think you are? A imageboard that's an offshoot of the original offshoot created specifically for the people who are "too extreme for Cuckchan". >You're the only guy here making it political, and people are sick of it. Isn't there like five other threads on the board's first page that have devolved into political shitflinging? >Your arguments are as bad as those people who think art is political. Those people are correct, just not for the reasons they want. >and focus on that one detail Because details matter? >This is a thread about opinions on vore and discussions on vore <not about how retarded you think people are Isn't that exactly what opinions are, though?

I love slimy insides. Goo-stuffed stomachs are amazing. Haven't seen lots of it but would like to.

>>71551 I like it too, but there's an upper-limit to it for me. It's nice when it's got a very specific type of viscosity to it, but when it starts looking like phlegm, I find it a little off-putting. Also feel like there are too many artists that make slimy insides look too much like drool.

>>71550 >>71544

I haven't been part of this autistic argument but I honestly think you may be retarded if you genuinely can't tell the difference between "monster girl eats humans and calls them inferior" and BLACKED

>>71555 True. It's fiction at the end of the day. If you enjoy characters eating and digesting other people, there really should be no problem with fictional racism. Being racist in real life is bad, but eating people in real life is also bad.

>>71557 >Being racist in real life is bad No, it's not.

>>71557 >but eating people in real life is also bad. Source?

what's better? An artist drawing 7 to 8 quick and decent sketches a week. Or An artist drawing one fully coloured and finished image a week. Also, would your opinion change if each sketch was a different character or the same character? Personally, I prefer multiple sketches. If there are different characters, then it means a higher chance of a character I like being used, and if it's all just one character, then I still agree as long as it's a character I love to see.

>>72241 the best time investment (provided the artist is creative enough for it) is b&w comics a sketchy looking comic with a good concept is much better than a fully rendered belly pinup

I know people won't agree with me on this, but I think Jaiden vore is not as good as Wolfychu vore Jaiden Vore is so boring, as her design is dull and leaves no room for creativity seen with how the only shit you see of her is story time vore which is overdone and not that interesting. It's also more questionable to draw Vore of her as her content is SFW, and her character is meant to be her and not just a stand-in for her. Wolfy, on the other hand, has a better design and personality for vore, does some NSFW art with her OC, and her OC doesn't really represent her fully, acting like a vtuber model. This is why we need to do more with Wolfy and less with Jaiden.

navels turning into outies fucking ruins images they should at least be easily editable into an innie

>>44747 I hate how good co ma stuff is. Just saw a comic he did and I love how the prey looks, but hate how she is the prey.

>>72814 And not to mention Jaiden having mental issues. IIRC she said she wasn't comfortable with artists drawing corn of her character, so best to respect that.

>>75163 >corn

>>72241 depending on the artist. someone like kiyoa on aryion is has the best "sketches"

I've been wondering this for a while. What do people prefer? When the pred makes a mistake, which causes them to eat the prey, or when the prey makes a mistake and gets eaten by the pred? For some examples, the pred could simply have made the mistake of not looking where their sitting, tripping over and eating someone mid-trip, or even jumping to conclusions and eating someone because they believed the prey did something bad when they didn't. For the prey, it could be them not paying attention and accidentally agreeing to being food, hiding in something the pred eats, or maybe the prey aciddently pissed of the pred like spilling their drink on them. The main reason I'm asking is that I personally don't know what I prefer, as both can be great. The idea of a pred accident resulting in the prey becoming food is hot as the prey had so little control over the outcome, they just become an accidental meal, and they die over a mistake. However, on the other hand, the prey making a mistake is also pretty hot as a simple accident with the wrong person means they become lunch and having them accidentally agree to be food can be hot when they beg to be let out but are refused since they agreed to it.

>>76058 I’m a fan of unaware vore so I definitely lean towards the latter of a prey fucking up.

Mini-Giantess/Amazon is the best type of pred.

Pregnant prey is hot, and there needs to be more of it in vore as it's criminally underused.

Slime preds are the best when used in vore with darker tones. They have some of the best stuff when it comes down to the more gritty side of vore, and can have some great stories when used for that purpose. One of the best vore stories I've ever seen is a hentai about a slime that takes on the form of cute girls for her lover. It just does a good job at leading to the reveal and with the implications of what is happening. It just made the whole story so much better, and the voreish implications were perfect.

>>72241 To add to this, what about an animation or multiple drawings? I'm mainly asking as I've been thinking about how there are some great animators who make good animations fast, yet I've been wondering, if they can animate that fast, then if they just did drawings, imagine how many images we would have. We could probably have 2 very well-made comics in the time they do one animation or a ton of great images. On the other hand, we don't get many animations, so having some is nice, but they also tend to feel a bit all over the place or simple, which makes sense since it's just one guy animating. Alternatively, if you prefer animations, would you like 10-second animations once or twice a month from an artist or for them to take their time and come out with 3 to 5-minute animations that could take up to even a year?