>>1353 Have not bothered to, I do not think they will announce anything unexpected. If they do not mention chainlink I will be disappointed, but it would not be unexpected.

>>1353 I did cause why not. A bunch of other neets are going to tune in as well. But it's just a handful of us compared to other banking institutions so it's not like they're gonna send oracle assassins after us, right?

>>1353 i did, and im gonna watch it so i can see how the price is dumping in real time once again it is what it is

>>1353 we'll dump immediately back to 12 as soon as the stream shows to be a nothingburger, and back to 13 if it does show chainlink involvement also rolling for black swan killing this pump

bro one of the intro animations is blocks being connected by chains

For anyone interested, they will show a fictional bank called "Margin Core" over a 24h period as it faces substancial balance sheet changes, liquidations, etc. Probably a play on "Margin Call", the movie, that showed a bank during a 24h timeperiod facing the 2008 crisis, just that this time, i guess they show how blockchain would have helped. Or this is some satanic signal

huh https://chain.link/hyperledger-besu-interoperability

ngl looks super similar to chainlinks website, seemingly use the same font and table sets

crosscheck with some previous ccip transactions?

>APPLE >INTC hmmmm

>>1842 what L2 are they using?

>>1841 >>1845 theres no L2, the only actual named blockchain products besides chainlink is hyperledger besu which is an opensource ethereum client. If anyone can dig up the AAPL or INTC transactions on ccip testnet a few months ago, that would help. I do seem to remember avalanche but not totally sure

>>1849 This?

>>1849 yea thats it. CCIP can also do private transactions which they did with the ANZ partnership. tho no idea if that means they would even appear on ccip then

>Polygon >Avalanche hmmmm

i just want to reiterate how much the interface looks like chainlinks design language, if this shit doesnt have any connections at all, i will literally shit a cat

>>1853 I assume theyre saying theyre using ava as an example of crypto trading? You suspect they might be looking at poly? >>1854 Im not familiar with CLL dev tools so I'm taking your word on that

>>1857 not talking about the dev tools specifically, look through this for example. https://data.chain.link/smartdata >I assume theyre saying theyre using ava as an example of crypto trading? You suspect they might be looking at poly? polygon/avalanche/base are the most used for testnet transactions by chainlink instutional partners sofar, so its interesting to see a lot of stuff cover

>>1859 Huh. It does look a bit similar. But I also desperately want this to be a correlation so I'm bias

>>1854 Sorry to burst your bubble kid. I've been in the front end app development space for 10+ years, and can code in complex software languages such as typescript and react. I can tell you that this is nothing more than lazy/incompetent devs using the same pre-built UI library. Google "free crypto admin template react" to see for yourself.

>>1870 Its over i sold

Nothing too juicy yet, huh?

>>1930 Nope I'm going to an hero. Goodbye everyone

>>1854 Yes anon it's Chainlink's tech they're using to jump between chains ( what interoperability protocol connects Polygon and Avalanche with other inhouse banking Hyperledger Besu blockchains?), tokenize their stocks while maintaining a "golden record" of the history and every aspect related to each tokenized stock.

Who did this?