I don't know what gay-ass shit's going on at Reddit, but Newton's idea of the faith of MOASS seems flawed
>1. MOASS is a thing
Fair. That probably needs to be a core tenant if you believe MOASS could happen.
>2. Options are bad
Options as a concept is fine. If you have done your homework and know how to reduce risk, good on you. Playing options when you don't even know how stocks work is fucking stupid. You will lose all of your money and your shares because you're dumb. Where he got this tenant is probably from the early days when mouth-breathing retards would ask imageboards and/or Reddit what they should do with their own money, and rightfully get told they are too stupid for options and shouldn't do them because they're stupid and gay.
>3. Research is bad - DD, TA, Predictions
Nigger, what? Who says this? Reddit fucking loved their "wrinkle-brains" coming along and making long-winded posts about how fucky things are. TA was considered stupid because you can't use normal TA on a manipulated stock. And it was always wrong. And therefore also gay. Meanwhile, chartanon was beloved because he was shedding light on real data. You also can't datefag a manipulated stock, because while they can't manipulate it forever, they can manipulate it for another two weeks while selling you calls so they can manipulate it for another two weeks.
>4. Selling the stock is bad
That's because anybody saying they sold the stock were either lying shills or swing-traders, both of which were and are retards and rightfully shunned. Shills because they were shills, and swing-traders because they were picking up pennies in front of a steamroller. Because of the drastic measures taken by a literal Rothschild in order to turn off the buy button, it was a reasonable assumption that something as fucky as the "sneeze" could happen again at any time. Time without shares is time that you could miss the bus to redeeming shares for destroyed Israels. And even back then, nobody was stopping people from selling. Nobody gives a shit about what you do. Bye. Go away. It's when you start acting like a cunt saying "OH BOY I SURE AM GLAD I SOLD MY GAMESTOP (Ticker: GME)! YOU SHOULD TOO." that people get uppity. Stop cunting around and fuck off.
>5. No financial advice, but DRS
DRS is apparently the ONLY way you can own the shares that you goddamn paid for. Remember that article a while back where there was legal issues with the voting rights for that one company because they decided that the DTCC owned everything and thus nobody had any claims to their shares? Someone has the image/article, I'm sure. If was a whole kerfuffle because street name and "beneficially owned" and all sorts of other jewish bullshit. And nothing about that was fixed. It just doesn't come up that often because a certain (((class))) of people manipulate everything so that they don't have to call attention that EVERYTHING in the market is fake and gay. DRS is the currently the best thing to do to get away from that.
>6. Short squeezes have particular parameters
This one's just talking about how all the run-ups we've had aren't actually short squeezes. They certainly aren't the Volkswagon squeeze, which is what anybody thinks about when you say "short squeeze". Sure, short squeezes happen all the time, but they can't have closed their greater-than 100% position because I still have my shares.
>7 Leadership is either for or against MOASS
A company has a fiduciary duty to bring value to their shareholders. They want the company to do good. If their shareholders are being defrauded by shorters selling an excess of shares and flooding the market with shares that don't exist, the company has a duty to fix that. Apparently telling shorters to get bent gets you into legal trouble, and nobody wants to get stuck paying lawyers and fighting jewish slimerats for several years just for doing your job.
I don't have perfect arguments for all the points, so he's probably right on more than one of them, but I don't give a shit. I made up most of my evidence anyway.