With regards to the "royal racism row"
>Much as liberals might not like to hear this, this is in fact what a nation is, and the reason that Fulani is being so defensive here is because she herself operates on an essentially “blood and soil” understanding of politics herself - she runs a domestic abuse charity for black women that among other things blames “sestemic racism” 🙄 - but knows that it is disadvantageous to minority immigrant groups if the native majority act in the ethnocentric way that she does.
>The lady in question isn’t doing this however, she’s actually doing the old imperial “paternal multicultural” routine and wants to know which end of the empire the subjects are from. Whether you see this as condescending or not, she genuinely doesn’t understand why Fulani would take offense to this, because she isn’t operating on “blood and soil” assumptions herself, at least not beyond the fact that in order to ascertain where Fulani is from, she has to be capable of recognising she is not part of the native population.
>But to Fulani, this is perceived as a threat because the politics of people like her are dependent on presenting their own particular interests as universal rights that they are owed, which requires that the people who they claim owe them something - in this case native white Brits - do not recognise themselfs as a particular group seperate to others; this sort of particularity must be defined as “exclusive” which is bad, unlike the exclusivity of people like Fulani which we are told was forced on them, and so they have a right to it. The aristocrat woman isn’t thinking politically - if she is even capable of thinking at all - but to allow people to speak freely, even in a non-political manner, carries the risk of undermining the carefully crafted narratives that people like Fulani are forced to maintain in order to justify their totally incoherent reasoning for what is ultimately a parasitic form of politics.
TLDR niggers are parasites