>>539072
I skimmed that, didn't really think much about it. but after taking a peek to jog my memory, Andrew says that he sees Nick clips, but doesn't actually watch the whole show. so he's missing explanations for things
for example, Daily Stormer pushes a pro-Russia/China message, and Nick used to as well. the idea was that maybe, if there are external pressures, that will help the collapse of anti-white, Jewish regimes. also, maybe these other countries could provide free speech infrastructure or asylum for dissidents. none of that has panned now, and instead it seems like we're seeing a seismic shift in the minds of the intelligent young white men, exactly what we need to take power in the future.
basically, it seems to me like Nick's approach is to reform, rather than entirely reject, the Atlanticist, American Imperialist, Washington D.C. Think Tank, Deep State etc. foreign policy program. where it actually can be argued that it furthers American interest, he would continue, and where it doesn't (Israel, Middle East, Russia) there it would be changed. NOT being blatantly pro-Russia/China because "US bad", because that makes it harder to get into power in the US. Anglin's explanation of Nick's position on this is like, that he has to be owned by the feds and that's why he's promoting a pro-American foreign policy. it's like he didn't hear Nick's explanation, so he doesn't get it, and calls him "NATO Nick", to attack his credibility. it all comes off to me like sour grapes because Andrew plugged away for years and years writing up a storm and never got the relevance he deserved, and now Nick has done that. Andrew came first, he's older, he inspired Nick, Nick used the Stormer as a source for news for his show... but now in 2025, Nick is rich/famous/relevant, Andrew is washed and knocked up a bunch of Asian hookers. so I can imagine that's difficult to deal with, but for me it's all about our race and the movement, not specific guys or their legacy...
another one is that Nick is dismissive of alternative Charlie Kirk assassination theories, whereas Anglin says that because the bullet 'got stuck in the neck', the official story can't be possible. I don't know what's true, but the fact that the guy that is blamed as being the shooter is alive and in custody, that seems to indicate that it isn't a Jew op. because if it were, they would want the guy dead, so he can't testify in court. major, unnecessary loose end. the bullet in neck thing is weird though so idk
and then he's criticizing Nick using Telegram. platforms are a problem for the right, what are you gonna do...?