>>548259
>He wants White Americans to have little ethnic apartheid hovels separate from the brownoids ala South Africa, which is a failed evolutionary strategy which has always failed longterm in every single society it has been tried over the last 5000 years
I watch his every show, and that is not what he calls for. what he calls for is for White American Nationalists to become wealthy and powerful, displacing the Jews, and then shut women up and remigrate shitskins and put niggers in jail
it's Aarvoll that wants us to go out in the middle of nowhere and waste all our time building a log cabin and milking a goat. Nick has said something like 'maybe we should have white-only areas? I don't know', which would be a good step forward but it's not the focus of what he's about
>He considers niggers and spics to be American
we are constrained by what is possible. if you wouid please consult the chart, what we have to do at this stage is obtain power. once we obtain power and start improving the cultural and demographic situations, then we can expand the scope of 'who needs to get the fuck out of our country'. there's no use in saying "we should be 100% white" impotently to an audience of 50 people. Nick has achieved more success than anybody that has preceded him in amassing a large following of young white people, breaking into the mainstream, normalizing our views and changing the culture
he doesn't actually WANT niggers and spics. rather, he is intelligent enough to understand that a bit of "I'm Catholic, I love everyone, BUT" works magnificently and breaking the conditioning and getting people to listen to what he's saying that otherwise wouldn't
>At one point he's dickriding Trump claiming god annointed him to save America, a few months later he's saying Trump is a puppet
it's called an incentive structure. when Trump says something good, he says "this is good, but we need to see follow-through and I'm not convinced we will". when Trump does something bad, he complains about it. that's not contradiction, it's feedback
>seethe seethe
yawn
>He's almost 100% CIA too
no evidence. Tucker is CIA and constantly attacks him, after pretending to cozy up to him
>>548260
he calls for young white men to get rich and infiltrate institutions, particularly Turning Point, Young Republicans, local politics, etc... the system doesn't want that
>channelling youth anger away from revolutionary causes and into a sterilised "based" political movement that appears white nationalist but in realpolitik involves preserving the current system
the revolution shite is a LARP. there's no plausible scenario where that ever happens. path of least resistance is to either take over the GOP or wipe it out with a third party, and registering a third party is prohibitively expensive and practically impossible