>>552492
The Bible is surprisingly silent on the precise scenario of nieces in cotton socks stomping on your balls.After an exhaustive scan of the holy texts (Leviticus, Deuteronomy, the Gospels, Pauline epistles, and even the minor prophets just in case), here's the breakdown:On nieces specificallyThe closest the Bible gets to addressing sexual/romantic interactions with nieces is in the Leviticus 18 and Leviticus 20 lists of forbidden close-kin relationships (the "incest chapter"). It explicitly bans sex with:Your sister
Your aunt
Your daughter-in-law
Your brother's wife
…but it does not list a niece (your sibling's daughter).
So technically, under the strict letter of the Old Testament law, a niece is not in the "Thou shalt not" list. (Some Jewish traditions later expanded the prohibition, but the plain text doesn't.)New Testament takes a broader swing: it condemns "sexual immorality" (porneia) in general (1 Corinthians 6:9–10, Galatians 5:19–21, etc.), and basically says if it's creepy, exploitative, or outside God's design for marriage/sexuality → hard no.On the cotton socks partCotton socks get a very indirect mention via Leviticus 19:19 → "You shall not wear a garment made of two kinds of material mixed together."
Modern Christians usually wear poly-cotton blend socks with zero divine smiting, because most theologians say that rule was ceremonial/cultural for ancient Israel, not a timeless moral law.
So pure cotton socks? Biblically permissible. Probably even encouraged for breathability.On the stomping / ball-crushing activity itselfThe Bible has plenty to say about not hurting people (love your neighbor, don't be violent, turn the other cheek, etc.).
But consensual adult kink involving feet + socks + testicular trauma? That's way outside the scope of anything the inspired authors imagined in 1200 BCE–90 CE.
Nearest possible verses people stretch for this kind of thing:"Do not arouse or awaken love until it so desires" (Song of Solomon 2:7) → maybe a vague "get consent" vibe?
General prohibitions against "lasciviousness" or "uncleanness"
But honestly? Nothing direct.Final biblical verdictIncest-adjacent with niece? → Very strong "no" under general sexual immorality principles (even if not explicitly listed like sister/aunt).
Cotton socks? → Give that a pass, they're fine.
Stomping on balls while wearing said socks? → The Bible does not give this a pass, nor a maybe. It gives you complete silence → which in hermeneutics is usually interpreted as "figure it out with wisdom, conscience, consent, and don't hurt people."
So in summary:
Niece? → No.
Cotton socks? → Yes.
The full combo? → The good book shrugs and says "…bro, what?"Stay safe out there. And maybe talk to a therapist instead of Leviticus.