I'm fugging well not left-leaning. >:(

>>1558 What matters is if the cute boys are left-leaning. Are you a cute boy?

>>1559 I have been called a "twink" & a "cuteboy" several times. :<

>>1555 Nice trips OP. :>

More like why are they left wing and also irrationally butthurt at pedophiles?

Just hide his posts & don't feed him after this post.

>>1563 >don't engage with wrongthink It is a legitimate question you fag.

Because rigid political identities are retarded and most people are retarded. When you're defining "right wing" as hates niggers and jews and "left wing" as wants to get cuckolded by a gang of muslims everything becomes meaningless. Politics is just the new sportsball where people pick the team they think has cool aesthetics then they adopt those aesthetic positions to be apart of a cool social in group. There's a minute amount of people in the world that actually take the time to flesh out a moral framework and analyze how each individual political policy feats into said moral framework. Most people aren't capable or don't have the time to invest that much into constructing these mental systems. It's the entire reason religion exists, inheriting moral and political frameworks is infinitely more efficient for both society and the individual.

>>1555 Because those on the left are the most open & accepting of any & all sexual acts. No matter how promiscuous. So the sluttiest whores among the gays will gravitate towards that. With that said however, right wing femboys do exist.

>>1565 I hate how if you fall into one category then that basically defines who you are and what political side you belong to. Like if I tell someone I'm bisexual they'll most likely automatically assume I'm a left-leaning person. Try to say you have right-wing politics and beliefs and you get met with the "how can you be gay and right-wing?". I think that line of thought has really fucked up the younger generation. Everyone just makes assumptions about everyone and once someone assumes something about you then that's it they've already made up their mind, no arguing against it.

>>1572 Wrong. They love pushing pedophilia onto kids through drag queens.

On a semi-related note, the world needs more nazi (or any other notorious political party/alignment) twink and femboy porn.

>>1574 We can make some together, anon.

>>1574 >the world needs more random politically charged shit that has no reason to be politically charged

>>1576 I firmly believe that a lot of problems could be solved faster if the involved parties just had sex with each other.

>>1577 Shotacons are not pedophiles.

>>1579 You're responding to a herd nigger trying to derail about pedo shit.

>>1580 Where's the moderation when we need em?

>>1563 Maybe the baiting will increase PPH?

>>1569 State your positions proudly since it's a mindfuck for them.

>pedo derail Ignore the nigger. He goes in every thread with this shit. Don't respond to him and if anyone does then it's just him talking to himself.

No mameys wey

>>1591 I'm pretty sure he is.

>>1555 By proper definition, to be right-wing is to favor that which is traditional and well-established in the social order. It is true that attitudes and policies toward homosexual behavior have varied, often rather wildly, between different times and places. But the assertion that homosexuality, in any form, can be equivalent to the heterosexual, (overwhelmingly) procreative norm is an emphatically modern, radical, historically unprecedented phenomenon. As is the construction of an identity based upon any particular sexual proclivities or behaviors. >boypussy is boypussy Are terms such as boypussy and mangina not euphemisms that at once both gloss over as well as implicitly acknowledge the unpleasant and dangerous realities of treating what is a structure of fecal elimination as if were the (exclusively female) copulatory orifice? Males don't have "pussies" (vaginas). And females do have anuses and rectums. >>1568 >right wing femboys do exist. OP's question was, >Why are a majority of homosexuals left-leaning? >>1575 Females don't have penises. Such grotesquery ruins what would have been a decent work of art, making repulsive what would have otherwise been appealing, titilating and even whimsical.

>>1555 You may find this site of interest: https://gaypatriot.org/ The Internet home for American gay conservatives.

>>1744 Imagine being a cuckservative.

>>1744 Ehh those are probably all middle-aged men though I want the right-wing femboys

>>1754 I'm basically half of these 2 things

>>1758 You're a middle-aged femboy?

>>1555 You're craving acceptance of people that simply just gassed you or use you as a shooting dummy (maybe not if you were deep down in the closet) and in this time a vast majority of them are people that dont worth have contact with them. You can have values, but please have some self-respect.

>>1767 OP knows the left hates him. It's why he's lamenting the fact that most fags are left leaning.

>>1768 To be specific, I'm lamenting the fact there's probably a fraction within a fraction of cute boys who are right-wing.

>>1763 Nah I'm young but not super fem and not super right wing even though I'm on the cultural right and a fucking bigot too Wish I was cuter however... I'm too tall/hairy/manly or something...

Are gays in other countries just as left-wing as they are in the west? I think gay people being like women mentally, are susceptible to media and want to avoid conflict. Most women, if not all women, are left-wing, even conservative types are still up for all sorts of welfare and inclusionary policies.

>>1772 Consider this. Actual leftcucks turned into trannies. I stand as witness of a hard core of venomously transphobic cuteboy community. Many cuteboys are racist, even homophobic (because of LGTBRAAP & pridefaggotry). I also contend that the community at large of cuteboys & cuteboy appreciators are not specifically gay as much as bisexual because most of them consider the clashing of two masculine (hairy, burly, etc) men in a sexual relationship to be disgusting, hence the "cute boys" æsthetic here: it is a complimenting of feminity within the male person, and concerning the gay relationship, an aspect of feminity makes the sexual and romantic relationship to be wholesome because æsthetically validated by nature. I want you to note that by "masculine man", I mean virile and manly male, hairy, bearded, the works. Thus meaning: it is alright for a feminine boy to be with another feminine boy *as well as* with a masculine boy/man, but not for a masculine man to be with another masculine man. This core distinction is what separates the cute boy from the tranny throng: indeed because if they were truly leftoïds, they would have trannified already and sunk down into the mental filth we are already familiar with known as the tranny movement. Essentially what the trannies really did was polarize the remaining gays that at best do not give a fuck about the globohomo perspective, and at worst hate its guts for how degenerate and retarded it is, including how it claims to represent the very people that certainly hate it to shreds or just don't care in general. In the meantime, the real /cuteboy/ or/and /cuteboy/ enjoyer is capable of appreciating the feminine AND masculine dimension within the attractive cute boy, something that the leftists and their trannies cannot, in their warped understanding of traditional gender roles, comprehend. Indeed it is a partial avowal of the validity of the traditional "interpretation" of gender that trannies are "mtf" or "ftm", but the fact that they think it is quickly switchable and easily interchangeable within a person's identity displays their crucial inability to truly appreciate the beauty of a gender's character. This is why I might also contend that the cuteboy community is not gay, but rather a unique form of bisexual; not attracted to both genders separately, but to both in the best possible form: an androgynous feminine male, with a femininity-evoking body, with delicate features - combined with the masculine dimension of the male body, with an often athletic condition and muscular body, as well as this particular "bro-ness" that one may also find in the femboy's companion, the tomboy (in terms of can-do, reliability, activity, usw.) The fact is that the tranny blend of leftists cannot truly comprehend gender, and that the appreciators of cuteboys while also really involved in the contemplation of gender, is not built from the ground up within the rotten dirt of political cult-building, and largely ideologically independent, making them less likely to be leftinoïds in the first place. I would like to add, finally, that one must consider the realities of the expectations of a person with this kind of æsthetic and broad characteristics; that cuteboys may be more frail as well as attracted to men, and that they thus come to the logical ideological conclusion that the system in which they live should provide a non-tolerant security for them to feel safe in, and being attracted to men (possibly) may also shape the image of the kind of political belief they will be attracted to. Since pozzed, tolerantist leftizm is not really "the manly position" by any means, they will gravitate more towards the right, also in part because the LGBIBBY pissed them off. Sensible cuteboys are also racist as fuck perhaps because they, as almost all humans do, evaluate everyone they meet (even just subconsciously) and the fact of the matter is that white men are just more attractive on average, and niggers are fucking shite not just overall but especially in the feminine homosexuality identity and appreciation aspect. Also as cute white boys going out with men and not women, they don't often contribute to the White birth rates, and may feel some sort of guilt about it. There is a wonderfully surprising amount of racism in the broader cuteboys community, and it's not a baseless meme that the alt-right has got some skirt-wearing anime fuckboys in its ranks. Personally I just find it lovely and fucking awesome. Of course I have not touched on what is perhaps the most important part which is the psychological-ideological relationship aspect of the right and alt-right spectrum and its characteristics, but I'm pretty sure nobody is going to read everything I typed out, so it doesn't even matter.

>>1773 >I'm pretty sure nobody is going to read everything I typed out, so it doesn't even matter. Cut it down, jesus. >cuteboys are transphobic >guys who like cute boys are straight >cuteboys are feminine but they understand they aren't women >jbw is universal Now with that shortened, what was the point of mentioning all of this? I already said cuteboys were girly and would prefer a protective harem than an everyman for himself, system. What did you add with your wall of text?

>>1774 >What did you add with your wall of text? Your reply

>>1555 Putting politics in gay stuff is like putting dihydrogen monoxide on water.

>>1773 Where have you see racist cuteboys? Wish I knew some. Although honestly when it comes to fag relationships you almost always see cuteboys with White guys, or unless they're Asian they're either with other Asian guys or White guys. Niggers are literally bottom of the barrel for sexual partners.

>>1827 >Where have you see racist cuteboys? Wish I knew some. There might be some in this very thread! >Niggers are literally bottom of the barrel for sexual partners. This is true. However, niggers are not the only ones with dark skin.

>talk to some guy online >ask about the book hes reading >tells me is folklore "but with african themes instead of european" >can't just say hes reading some african book, he has to mention how its a step up from europe >the guy is white Why are gay people so gay?

>>1931 You can be a fag without being gay. Soyboys are proof of this.

Quite frankly I do not like boys who post naked pictures of themselves on the internet. Whores should be universally hated no matter the sex. I want a monogamous relationship with another cute feminine boy. Not feel like a cuck that's just an accessory to a whore. Who shares their body to the whole world. This shouldn't be so controversial but feels like it is with how loose so many boys are.

>>1995 I don't think it's controversial. I'm not offended by fags whoring themselves out but I'd also not want to be in a relationship with them.

>>1995 By virtue of your mental illness, that just can't be.

>>1996 Is it just too much to ask for some standards from people? To just save themselves for a real relationship & respect their bodies more?

>>1998 Are they really whoring themselves out if they aren't having sex? The way I look at it, I watch porn, a ton. Sometimes the kinds I like don't exist and I'd like it if there was more. Now how can I expect something like that, people to go out and make porn for free if I don't myself? Homos aren't a large part of the population and most people having gay sex aren't even gay. So its not like women saving themselves since they're practically guaranteed a loving husband if they keep pleasant. Its not the same for men.

>>1999 It doesn't take having sex to be a whore. Look at women. They can make mountains of cash without even taking their bra off but they do anyway. The power of the lusty simp allows men & women alike to sell their bodies through a screen. It's the same shit really.

>>2000 <Now how can I expect something like that, people to go out and make porn for free, if I don't myself? >BUT WOMEN MAKE MONEY OFF DESPERATE MEN SO YOU'RE WRONG

>>2002 You shouldn't be making porn unless you're drawing it in the first place.

>>1999 3D porn is degenerate.

>>2004 All porn is inherently degenerate lol

>>2006 And degeneracy is a sliding scale.

>>2009 No, it's a flat line.

None of you are married, so ether your having sex casually or you're jerking off. Are you really telling me you're jerking off to nothing? >inb4 its 2d /cuteboys is inherently 3d or this board wouldn't exist. I know this thread is about how annoying it is that people who engage in homosexuality are massive faggots but hating porn isn't what makes someone right wing in anyway.

>>2012 /cb/ being 3D doesn't mean I have to like 3D or want to date people who post images of themselves online. >I know this thread is about how annoying it is that people who engage in homosexuality are massive faggots but hating porn isn't what makes someone right wing in anyway. Why would I care about what makes someone right wing? Are you telling me you adopt positions based on how you perceive they land on the false dichotomy rather than your own observed reality? You sound like a fucking retard. There is no contradiction in using /cb/ while disliking sluts, or liking porn but disliking 3D porn. All of these are compatible positions.

>>2013 >Why would I care about what makes someone right wing? Its what the thread is about kinda. >You sound like a fucking retard. kek. Posting media of yourself naked doesn't make you a slut.

>>2013 I think you should have better comprehension of the thread. It's not about adopting different beliefs to conform with someone else. It's about you being less likely to find a partner (in this case a cuteboy bf) because their politics are probably more likely to be left-wing and the type of people to not like right-wingers. The only way to adapt to this is just hide your powerlevel around your partner or pretend to share their beliefs. Also I think there's a difference between porn and naked pictures.

>>2012 2D is always superior. 3D just makes me feel disgusted.

>>2016 I agree, I literally live in a two-dimensional world and i'm typing this from my 2D computer on my tiny beautiful little drawn world

>>2014 >Posting media of yourself naked doesn't make you a slut. Looks like you don't just sound like a retard. >>2015 >Also I think there's a difference between porn and naked pictures. An anon expressed his discontent with people whoring themselves online. Then faggots come around talking about how it's noble to be a fucking cam whore because else no porn would ever exist. It's a brain dead position. There is nothing wrong with not wanting to date cam whores you fucking losers.

>>2017 The point is 2D is just better. They're just lines on a paper or a screen. No real people debasing themselves.

The boy in OP pic deleted some stuff off his twitter :( Wonder why

>>2020 probably realized how much of a tease he is kek

>>2021 All his twitch videos are gone too. Poor boy probably received attention he wasn't expecting.

>>2019 Yeah I never disagreed with you, as I am a 2D person.

Hello everyone,if you need some pictures send me message brahimzakry01@gmail.com

>>1767 >>1568 >Because those on the left are the most open & accepting of any & all sexual acts. Nope. Most leftists not from the West will say that all of your good attitudes toward various sexual preferences are capitalist imposed views for the sake of increasing profits from condoms, dildos, lubes, drugs, music, clothing - you are literally slaves to the ideology of the bourgeoisie. Socialist society requires freedom of opinion only at the beginning of revolutions; afterwards, society is subject to total control and purging to create the ideal of a communist human being. >You're craving acceptance of people that simply just gassed you or use you as a shooting dummy Lol. All this was in the USSR before Nazi Germany. And in Stalin's time it was even a criminal offense. Literally the American Left with all their LGBT stuff are Trotskyists, and the Russian and Chinese Left are Stalinists. Even add up all the leftists in the world and you get a horrifying number of people pushing away cute boys who are willing to kill and rape them en masse. And they can easily justify all this with their political views on the revolution. And the Nazis had Ernst Julius Günther Röhm who adored cute boys, of course not least he was killed for that.

>>2565 Then explain why leftists are all about sex workers, onlyfans, or stream whoring?

>>2567 >>2567 I have no idea. Maybe because it's the Western left? Maybe because most propaganda methods have moved to the Internet? Maybe because a Twitter post is more important than blowing up a bank? Maybe because they've become so embedded in the capitalist system that whining about bigtech, gaming, streaming, onlyfans, about how little left agenda there is in a new Netflix movie is the position? Maybe according to modern concepts of Marxism they are doing an important thing, choosing effective points for pressure?

>>2569 All commies are cringe larpers that worship a pipe dream ideology that always ends in fascist dictatorships & mass murder. The point is right now the western left are the current big larpers that are the issue in the world right now. And they're huge fucking whores. Probably because all of them are sexpests, pedophiles, & so ugly they can only realistically get laid by normalizing promiscuity to get people's lust going.

>>2573 >the western left are the current big larpers that are the issue in the world right now. And they're huge fucking whores. Probably because all of them are sexpests, pedophiles, & so ugly they can only realistically get laid by normalizing promiscuity to get people's lust going. LOL! As if that doesn't describe a huge percentage of the alt-right. https://affirmativeright.blogspot.com/

>>2614 The altright does not exist. It is & always has been a glow nigger psyop.

The left supports whores because women are the foundation of "naturalistic" morality. Women with their monopoly on reproduction want to have chads kids and have other men raise them. All of leftist and authoritarian ideologies exist to make this possible, the ones that succeed are the ones that interfere the least with women's ideal reproduction. Sexual promiscuity and abnormalities are bad when they get in the way of this. So pedophiles are bad, porn is bad, sex tourism is bad, because these things give lower tier men options to women before or independent of chad. Where rampant homosexual sex or women being whores and single mothers or protections and higher prices for older sex workers is good , since this keeps lower men docile and out of the way of women and chad.

>>1770 Just shave frequently, wear feminine clothing, and smell feminine.

I love how some leftists try to dress up as right-wing extremists, but make the simplest mistakes, like the Strasserist flag in the background. It's cute and funny. This shows that the left feels that the right is right in its theses, and tries to accuse them of hypocrisy, of betraying their own views. And if they are hypocritical in their own views, you can then dismiss them all as stupid, wrong, and dangerous. This guy here is not ironically a Pol Pot fan. But he likes aggressive right-wingers. When the left sees that, they start their favorite game - it's not the left, it's the right. It quickly becomes clear that Pol Pot is right-wing and all crimes committed under the banner of the left are instantly attributed to the right. It's always a lot of fun.

>>2772 I have heard rumors that the person in those pics is underage so I have deleted the files.

>>2773 No problem and thanks for your work.

>>1743 >It is true that attitudes and policies toward homosexual behavior have varied, often rather wildly, between different times and places. Not really. Outside of references (That have no origin) to the Spartans sodomizing their soldiers before they hit puberty, almost every culture classified homosexuals as men who abandoned their masculinity for being a woman. Where the difference lay was whether they then executed the fags, or forced them to become women in society. >>1772 >Are gays in other countries just as left-wing as they are in the west? From what I've seen, particularly in second and third world countries, no. They just want more freedoms and less authoritarian rule. >>1773 Nigger, condense that to 20 words or less. >>2002 Anon, I'm not sure if you're aware, but some of the biggest consumers of gay porn are women. >>2012 >but hating porn isn't what makes someone right wing in anyway. Need look no further than how Feminists are doing everything to get even slightly lewd images banned because "Muh soggy knees". >>2565 >Most leftists not from the West will say that all of your good attitudes toward various sexual preferences are capitalist imposed views for the sake of increasing profits from condoms, dildos, lubes, drugs, music, clothing - you are literally slaves to the ideology of the bourgeoisie. You DO realize that the "free love" movement was actually started in Soviet Russia with Lenin's full approval, and only came to an end 20 years later because society was in shambles as a result of it, right: https://yewtu.be/watch?v=FfNibO4aTDY >>2567 Because countries like China pay for their continued existence for the sole purpose of destroying Western values, and to make their country look even more appealing to Conservative minded folk.

>>2855 Yes i DO. https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/История_преследования_гомосексуалов_в_России#Декриминализация_в_Советской_России But it was stalinism that introduced repression against this that is now popular in the countries of the East. What did Stalin do? He destroyed the leninists by calling them trotskyists. As for the destruction of society, it occurred during the civil war unleashed by the bolsheviks. However, all this does not mean that Stalin himself is not a closeted gay and pedophile. His signatures to paintings where he was very frank are known. His contacts with a gay British diplomat are known. All this is to say that the left is always hypocritical.

>>2853 Hot

>>1565 Those stances originate from old america which is regressive by default.

>>1555 Sexual liberty as define by the American society leans left by default.

>>1568 The only government that had a NatSoc system forbids the construct that is homosexuality.

>>1569 Its an umbrella term a catch a catch all wing.

>>1573 This is not true at all or an anecdotal scenario. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Is_the_Army A historical film which includes drags. I only reference this because of historical context however this mention of movie maybe irrelevant and have no authority about contemporary contexts.

>>2567 Sexual liberation thats it.

>>1578 Too much love will kill you.

https://lawsuit.org/general-law/republicans-have-an-obsession-with-transgender-pornography/ This is about the point of view of the right side so although yeah its wrong to conflate although it is also valid due to these prejudices.

>>1587 Didn't ask.

>>1743 I didn't care.

>>1743 Women and girls can have penises though.

>>1769 Most of the right (I guess american right since this is an american website) disdain the act of homosexuality.

>>1772 Because its an across the board concept.

>>1773 >Consider this. Actual leftcucks turned into trannies. I stand as witness of a hard core of venomously transphobic cuteboy community. Many cuteboys are racist, even homophobic (because of LGTBRAAP & pridefaggotry). I also contend that the community at large of cuteboys & cuteboy appreciators are not specifically gay as much as bisexual because most of them consider the clashing of two masculine (hairy, burly, etc) men in a sexual relationship to be disgusting, hence the "cute boys" æsthetic here: it is a complimenting of feminity within the male person, and concerning the gay relationship, an aspect of feminity makes the sexual and romantic relationship to be wholesome because æsthetically validated by nature. I want you to note that by "masculine man", I mean virile and manly male, hairy, bearded, the works. Thus meaning: it is alright for a feminine boy to be with another feminine boy *as well as* with a masculine boy/man, but not for a masculine man to be with another masculine man. This core distinction is what separates the cute boy from the tranny throng: indeed because if they were truly leftoïds, they would have trannified already and sunk down into the mental filth we are already familiar with known as the tranny movement. Essentially what the trannies really did was polarize the remaining gays that at best do not give a fuck about the globohomo perspective, and at worst hate its guts for how degenerate and retarded it is, including how it claims to represent the very people that certainly hate it to shreds or just don't care in general. In the meantime, the real /cuteboy/ or/and /cuteboy/ enjoyer is capable of appreciating the feminine AND masculine dimension within the attractive cute boy, something that the leftists and their trannies cannot, in their warped understanding of traditional gender roles, comprehend. Indeed it is a partial avowal of the validity of the traditional "interpretation" of gender that trannies are "mtf" or "ftm", but the fact that they think it is quickly switchable and easily interchangeable within a person's identity displays their crucial inability to truly appreciate the beauty of a gender's character. This is why I might also contend that the cuteboy community is not gay, but rather a unique form of bisexual; not attracted to both genders separately, but to both in the best possible form: an androgynous feminine male, with a femininity-evoking body, with delicate features - combined with the masculine dimension of the male body, with an often athletic condition and muscular body, as well as this particular "bro-ness" that one may also find in the femboy's companion, the tomboy (in terms of can-do, reliability, activity, usw.) The fact is that the tranny blend of leftists cannot truly comprehend gender, and that the appreciators of cuteboys while also really involved in the contemplation of gender, is not built from the ground up within the rotten dirt of political cult-building, and largely ideologically independent, making them less likely to be leftinoïds in the first place. I would like to add, finally, that one must consider the realities of the expectations of a person with this kind of æsthetic and broad characteristics; that cuteboys may be more frail as well as attracted to men, and that they thus come to the logical ideological conclusion that the system in which they live should provide a non-tolerant security for them to feel safe in, and being attracted to men (possibly) may also shape the image of the kind of political belief they will be attracted to. Since pozzed, tolerantist leftizm is not really "the manly position" by any means, they will gravitate more towards the right, also in part because the LGBIBBY pissed them off. Sensible cuteboys are also racist as fuck perhaps because they, as almost all humans do, evaluate everyone they meet (even just subconsciously) and the fact of the matter is that white men are just more attractive on average, and niggers are fucking shite not just overall but especially in the feminine homosexuality identity and appreciation aspect. Also as cute white boys going out with men and not women, they don't often contribute to the White birth rates, and may feel some sort of guilt about it. There is a wonderfully surprising amount of racism in the broader cuteboys community, and it's not a baseless meme that the alt-right has got some skirt-wearing anime fuckboys in its ranks. Personally I just find it lovely and fucking awesome. Of course I have not touched on what is perhaps the most important part which is the psychological-ideological relationship aspect of the right and alt-right spectrum and its characteristics, but I'm pretty sure nobody is going to read everything I typed out, so it doesn't even matter. Who ask you to speak?

>>1773 You do not define the collective whole of this community nor you have the authority of it.

>>1825 h2ophobic kys

>>1931 Did you ever think what was the book? Is the author non african? Subjectively the book is better than euro based literature as state by the person. Race obsession is a problem and you need to get help.

>>1995 <this board quite the projection innit bruv

>>1996 We are all whores we just sell different parts of the body. >>1997 Yeah. >>1998 Talk about humility for real.

>>2000 is this actual stupidity

>>2003 <What are references? Dumbfuck.

>>2014 Do you even know that word?

>>3740 And how to use it specifically?

A list of nolifers. >>2023 >>2019 >>2017 >>2016

>>2018 Why the hypocrisy and mental gymanstics?

>>2565 The Chinese left are Maoist not Stalinist. Also its policies are quast de facto socialist.

>>2566 bussy

>>2565 >conflates two different ideologies can you try to be non partisan or a moderate

>>2569 You see the tree but not the forest.

>>2665 This post reeks of self insecurity which does not reflect the historical matter at and contains prejudicial narrative.

>>1770 Take a diet go exercise. >>2769 smell is only a small factor here

>>2853 Remove your hair properly imbecile also your arm girth is too fat in my opinion.

>>2772 Nationalism is objectively an american rightist stance.

>>2772 Some of the ethos and mores of strasserism leans towards left empirically. And yes it is still truthfully right wing.

>>2855 Well that is because as society economically progresses the people want more freedom. This is a common pattern from first world nation states.

>>2855 <last reply This is slander without any evidential proof.

>>2855 There are many sides and positions that are need to account for. Some lewd imagery or pictures that are lewd may contain misogyny hence some would condemn it.

>>2872 A contact with a gay british diplomat may not have relevance to this context.

>>2855 Lenin and Stalin had different beliefs.

>>2565 >Ernst Julius Gunther Rohm The context of death is because of treason politically not socially.

>>2566 >hermaphrodites ???

>>2569 Or maybe you can not see the whole thing itself. American left [north and south] is inherently different when compare with British left or any European left factually.

Welp this is my last reply to this forsaken thread. Why do I reply to troll thread? Why do I know the answer to this post and still do it with no sense of regret?

>>1555 I can't speak for other countries, but in America "right-wing" tends to be synonymous with Republican, and the Republican Party has been vocally anti-gay for the majority of my life. Only recently have they shifted to being anti-trans or whatever. But if you poll them, the vast majority will tell you they are against basic things like marriage equality.

>>3888 >vast majority statistically around half of them support gay marriage

>>3888 Don't you have the log cabin republicans or whatever the gay caucus in the party is called?

>>3897 yeah, they sued the government to overturn the ban on gays in the military

im a left leaning hrt boy and i kinda want to date a right wing guy as a fetish. idk if that helps

>>3954 >im a left leaning hrt boy and i kinda want to date a right wing guy as a fetish Pass as a woman, and then we'll talk.

>>3985 So true, king.

Salutations, cute comrades. I am trying to reach out to pro-White LGBT people and give us a platform to rally around. Rather than Fascism and Nazism, I am seeking to build a more centrist, yet still ethnocentric movement to represent our interests that takes cues from National Bolshevism, Strasserism and National Anarchism. Please feel free to visit the home thread, here: https://zzzchan.xyz/pol/thread/4079.html and hangout with us.

>>4063 FBI-kun I don't see anything worthwhile

>>4065 Why would I be the FBI? IMO, I think White Nationalism should become less "radical". And of course you don't see much; that's why I'm trying to shill, to get more activity since it's in its infancy.

>>4066 whatever no good pics and even then I won't shoot a school for you

>>4067 >whatever no good pics I mean, you're not wrong. White Nationalism could certainly use more sexiness and cuteness. >even then I won't shoot a school for you Well, good, I would hope not.

>>4070 your politics are gay and retarded, but nice pics

>>4071 >your politics are gay and retarded Why do you feel that way?

>>4070 >>4072 nice pics. Retarded politics because focusing on skin color is retarded while the real ennemies are the one from the 1%

>>4073 >Retarded politics because focusing on skin color is retarded It is objectively not retarded, though. Any difference in appearance correlates to an internal difference, such as mentality. Skin color isn't just superficial. We have an overwhelming amount of scientific evidence that has virtually proven physiognomy to be true and it is a biological law that things that appear different also behave different; this is easily demonstrated with Belyaev's foxes, where selecting foxes to breed based on behavior correspondingly changed their physical appearance and this applies to every other species including humans - it's why we all have different cultures. If two things look different, it is because they are fundamentally different, not just superficially different and this has been further proven with cognitive and forensic science . Thus, race is not just a matter of skin color. The reason you are even able to look at pictures of cute femboys on the internet is because of the overwhelming contributions to technological progress from White people, with some East Asian contribution, as well. That's objectively important and is worth valuing. >the real enemies are the one from the 1% And the funny thing is that the 1% uses immigration as a weapon against the poor. Immigration is used to devalue labor and create a never ending cycle of consumption and environmental destruction. Multiracialism is largely a result of the 1% and they are who stand to benefit most from it. Multiracialism is the end goal and optimum state of capitalism, where consumption and production is the primary measure of success, not meaningful and non-materialistic life. Listen, I don't actually hate other races, but I know who benefits me the most and who I have the most chemistry with. White people provide the most benefit to me and the most chemistry. Why would I want to live in a city of 500,000 of 50% White people when I could potentially live in a city that's 90% White people and thus more beneficial and attractive to me? It is "ethnostates" like Japan, the various states of Europe, White America, China, etc that have brought us the coolest and most useful shit as a species, so how can you have the audacity to say such a thing is "retarded"?