>>3362 On the public front, it's pretty much over. That's why I want to turn this place into a resource where people have the ability gen whatever they want in the comfort of their own home.

>>3370 I think people can practice genning or other stuff. And practice Loras without nudity

>>3371 Exactly, this place can be a good resource to help people do that. You can still gen sfw stuff here as well.

>>3370 I wanna gen but have zero idea how. Zero

>>3373 Once the lewds are clear, I'll take some time revamp the board

>>3362 That summary says it has more holes in it than swiss cheese but It is pointless to not read the actual law.

>>3376 Whether the law has holes in it doesn't matter. What does matter is that it gives the police the impetus to arrest and search at will. While you can go through the court system and fight the charges, you already lost money on stress, monetary damages, etc...

>>3377 That's what the guys at /b/ don't understand. At the end of it you could be declared innocent but all your family and friends would know you generated pictures of Taylor Swift getting fucked in the ass by black men lol.

>>3379 I showed my brother the pics of taylor swift getting spitroasted by white men that I made and he really liked them.

>>3377 I'm hoping for a challenge by some group and have it go to the Supreme court to at least differentiate free speech genning and intent to hurt me revenge porn. Maybe could be back in a few months

>>3362 So where will people go to get pics now? discord?

>>3393 discord is literally the worst choice possible

>american "freedom" kek

Well, it was an honor. Fuck you for bending the knee you little bitch.

>>3440 It's the 8chan admin. He lives in the USA and doesn't want to be sent to El Salvador to be anal graped.

>>3442 >what are you in for? >allowing fake pictures of celebrities on my site <El Rompehuesos backs off slowly

>>3442 Well he's a pussy. All he has to do is remove images in 48 hours when someone complains.

Is this allowed? I think so right

>>3453 This is fine.

and americans will go right back to yapping about muh freedoms and muh constitution. NPC country

>>3453 >>3453 The law has this weird "we know it when we see it" shit

>>3420 How did you come up with this definition of lewd? Why are bikini images banned?

>>3393 >So where will people go to get pics now? The onions.

>>3463 Any good sites in particular? I don't think Dread has a board for it yet

>>3469 I have no idea. I just know that's where people will move to since there won't be any alternatives. This type of thing was always going to go underground, celebrities simply weren't going to put up with it.

From Congress' website: (emphasis mine) Once both chambers of Congress have each agreed to the bill, it is enrolled – that is, prepared in its final official form and then presented to the President. Beginning at midnight on the closing of the day of presentment, the President has ten days, excluding Sundays, to sign or veto the bill. If the bill is signed in that ten-day period, it becomes law. If the president declines to either sign or veto it – that is, he does not act on it in any way – then it becomes law without his signature (except when Congress has adjourned under certain circumstances). Essentially, we won't be saved by trump simply not signing it

>>3495 When is the 10 days over?

>>3496 end of day, 8th of May, EST.

I just found this article, what do you think the odds are that she claimed it was AI when it was really her? I feel like a lora trained on an individual would be trash, just based off of photo quality and amount available to train on https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/elliston-berry-deepfakes-social-media-b2566806.html

>>3499 No bro. It looked like the classmates used those shitty nudify apps. The ones that let you nudify an image or replace the face with a nude body.

>>3500 Those zoomers had to ruin everything.

>>3495 >>3496 >>3498 Congress can pass a bill but still withhold sending it to the president until the end of the year. It isn't enrolled until it's actually on Trump's desk, which, as far as I know, hasn't happened yet. So, we don't know when the bill will actually get signed into law.

It's Trump's wife's bill of course Trump is gonna sign it

I want to add that the bill also allows someone to force content to be taken down if it cases harm (including "physiological" harm) to the individual, even if there's no nudity or sexuality involved.

>>3532 So you also go to jail for a troll picture of Ryan gosling for example? If he's dressed like a pink fairy and the real Ryan gosling complains? ( Is that what psychological harm means?)

I just wanna make videos of IRL women getting blasted with semen man. Fuck this gay Earth.

>>3532 >>3543 >even if there's no nudity or sexuality involved. Nevermind, this part was incorrect. I'm stupid.

Trump just signed it. https://archive.ph/5AzNq

https://archive.ph/w7t4X Every EU country must make deepfake nudes illegal by June 2027. This is hardly a US-only problem.