>>67306 I really don't care so long as shemale stays around.

>>67309 Anon, anon pls

>>67306 Really adding the important stuff

>>67305 Absolutely. They're also usually super horrid OOCly. Like they let their their stick up the ass dom attitude bleed into OOC which means they'll just be crude and abrasive and will get genuinely incensed if you suggest anything that doesn't have them be treated as le "GIGADADDY UBERGODSTUD DOM"

>>67296 No, it's not wrong at all. >>67309 Switch life good.

>>67307 True switches are the rarest thing. Usually they very heavily lean into one direction (sub)

>>67307 My profiles set to switch barely get any play. People seem to heavily prefer having your profile set to dom or sub

>>67307 For switch, it usually means that my characters swing one way or the other by default and don't really sweat it. They're more like your average hedonist, preferring pleasure (or connections) over worrying about the means. Bit different than a dom hard-domming or hard-subbing.

>>67315 >>67316 I haven't had too much issue getting play as a switch, though I'll admit most like me to dom >>67317 I guess for me it's more about the setup for the play! Sometimes my characters can be hard-dom or hard-sub with the right partner and story. You all do actually do more than just typefuck and have stories attached right anon?

>>67319 Fucking hell...

>>67318 There's a certain appeal (for me, and some of the thread will hate me for saying it) in parading as a hard dom and being a hard dom, but also in parading as a hard dom and ending up being a sub. In both cases, I guess they're inflexible, though I guess some people with true dom intentions could end up subbing because of the allure. I would separate that from regular switching, though. Which feels more unfettered by expectation. But everyone has their own take on it, so I'm not gonna say you're wrong.

>>67291 me when it's about parasite infested bugs impregnating brains

>>67291 What is the fetish? Domming doms?

>>67321 Nah I get it, it's not like I don't think that's good from time to time! Though really, whatever is the most fun to you and whoever you write with works best

>>67324 I run the gamut, *sorta*. I will switch, I will dom, I will sub. I do kind of gravitate towards subbing more as of late (moods can be mercurial, and sometimes you just have a period where you prefer one over the other). I'm not necessarily committed to specifically one way of doing a thing, but I do have an appreciation for certain dynamics. Which probably is me being kinda picky because that ends up resulting in a limited selection of pairings that I vastly favor over others.

If literally everyone fell for the papertiger meta, then who is even domming nowadays?

>>67327 People who papertiger also have times where they wanna dom paper tigers. I have a paper-tiger domming dom, and I have a paper-tiger dom. The concept is hot to me, and I don't necessarily need to play one side of that equation specifically to enjoy that.

>>67327 BIG BUG COCK

>>67325 Sometimes that's why I just vanish on certain profiles for a long while. Just can't get into the headspace to play out scenes with them for those interested in the character. I think that's perfectly fine, and that our tastes gravitate with time!

so fucking based

>>67330 Hooo, I know that feel. Sometimes I really get into x or y profile, and then there's time I just don't feel it for extended periods of times. And then I eventually cycle back to it. What I meant more so that for example I end up picking one or a small few combinations to pair together. Like with purple, I will very much want the dom with dom thing over just a dom and a sub, or two switches, or any other permutation. Within that box, things can change. The dom can be bigger than the sub, or it could be a small dom with a big sub, but I will very much lean towards the uncompromising dom on dom thing where the sub in this situation is just the one that is "the loser", so to speak. And it stays that way throughout the RP. I have more of these hard-prefs. Like for when I play femboys? I will generally always flock towards masculine men that tower over them. Sometimes a shota partner, rarely a shemale and pretty much never a female.

>>67331 Totally fine by me. FtM and MtF trans and intersex will literally just be treated the same way by me as oranges are now.

>>67332 An actually gay femboy? Waow

>>67333 Yeah I'm fine with it too. I'm just glad they decided to keep shemale as a term because a lot of retards were pushing for it to be changed to "gynomorph" which sounds fucking stupid

>>67333 >have to update 100 profiles to put all those in No now

>>67332 Ok, I get what you mean now! Huh, guess I usually don't have such hard and fast specifics for what I desire! Been talked into plays that I probably wouldn't like kink wise, but done in a way I actually didn't mind. Despite the stonetoss memes, for me context from story matters

>>67334 One of my first OCs (tied to a game) started out as kind of a twinky shonen protag-esque dude that was very much straight. Hard-straight, if I recall. The kind of cocky, chuuni cringe type (because I was also younger). Over time, I feminized him as my interests started expanding and he went from bisexual to ultimately mostly gay. Kinda kept the sardonic nature for him, though. I wanted there to remain a spark of who he originally was, and that's generally in his attitude. I still love sub/bottom femboys with men, and I probably always will.

>>67337 I've definitely had eureka moments, but generally, I kind of know the things I like. Naturally, I do like a bit of story (though I do ultimately go to f-list for smut, so it's not like I'd call myself story-driven), but I don't really wanna roll the dice on whether I'll end up liking the pairing based on the story. I need to like the pairing and setup to begin with. It can't grow on me after the fact. Contrasts tend to be pretty high on the list. I considered it just recently and I think most of my pairings have some amount of size difference. Then there's cultural stuff, physiological stuff, age differences, etc. And yes, skin color differences, race differences and species differences as well when they apply. Masc men dominating smaller femboys, shortstack shemales dominating bigger women (or shemales), hulking shemales dominating more average sized shemales, shorter shotas dominating femboys, monsters dominating smaller men, women or shemales, etc.

>>67339 >shortstack shemales dominating bigger women (or shemales) imagine

>>67340 Not had the pleasure that often, but it is fun, yes. Especially with pet play. Being forced to go walkies alongside a much smaller dom that should by all means be easy to overthrow.

>>67339 Oh like, of course I have to like the pairing before I play I'm just able to be pushed into focusing certain kinks with the right backdrop! I'm not gonna play with someone I don't at least find the character attractive in some way. Don't care if the FUB comes up with a story that would tickle my fucking taint, I don't want to fuck him

>>67342 Oh, yeah. That has happened to me. A few of the "fringe-ish" kinks I like or am dipping into nowadays are because one or two of my saucier partners / friends talked me into it (typically by emphasizing the degradation angle).

treddy

Lazy fucks >>67345 >>67345 >>67345