>>325108
>>325194
I am the creator of the original version of this. I appreciate you attempting to update it (I think two anons have updated it previously).
I can explain the original categories if you'd like. Atm, you're trying to erase some and treat multiple as the same which is where you're running into logical trouble.
(Disclaimer, don't take this too seriously, the list was just for fun)
>top vs bot, dom vs sub
"top vs bot" is not the same as "dom vs sub". One just refers to position in sex and the other refers to "who decides what happens", there's a difference. Power bottoms want the bottom position in sex but decide what happens, they're in charge and the other obediently listens to what they tell them to do (or they can also lead physically from the bottom position... ). Submissive tops are the opposite, they are on top position in sex but are not in charge and submissive to their partner who are telling them what to do or leading them from the bottom position. Atm you're labeling all tops as dom and all bots as sub, which is wrong. You can have a dominant person who tops or bottoms and a submissive person who tops or bottoms (Example: You can have sex with a woman, and dominantly dictate the motions, while on top of her or her laying on top of you).
>Light Sub, Light Dom
These are not right. The original are "vanilla, but is the submissive/dominant one in the relationship", so mostly vanilla. To say they're "sub or dom" implies that they are minority or not vanilla. The point of those categories is that they are the border groups of vanilla, "vanilla, BUT with a small twist".
>Vanilla
Vanilla.
>Tsundere
It is similar, but tsundere is personality/development type, while the original category was just, "bitch on the outside which would usually imply dom, but is a huge sub". Not quite the same as "tsundere", which devolves into lovey dovey. (Tip, you could have both categories)
>Switch categories
They were necessary and I still believe they are. "Habitual switch" refers to a switch that switches habitually (ie, not by intentional thoughtful choice, they just do it because they're lazy, drunk, don't care, etc.; out of habit or circumstance). Durin would be a habitual switch, or Ling because she gets too drunk. Gavial would be a regular switch (likes both, willingly chooses both, depends on mood). "Super Switches" are extreme switches who can switch on the whim between both ends of the spectrum, usually is crazy unlike regular Switches who are just versatile people. Programmed sexuality is technically beyond a super switch (being a literal computer switch, who can change to anything anytime for any reason), so it was put below them.
>Incidental Gentle Dom
This refers to someone that, due to their physical body and/or sexual nature/capabilities, the act of sex with them would be emasculating or inherently dominant on their part. It is not intentional on their part, it's "accidental femdom", but you are trying for normal sex so it is gentle in nature, so "accidental gentle dom". For example, sex with Hoshi will naturally be, accidentally, somewhat femdom due to her size and strength, but she is not intentionally trying to dom you. It just comes with the package of sex with Hoshi.
>PseudoDom
Doms only in image and at first, who may attempt to dom, but quickly fall apart to their true selves either due to pressure, stress, attitude, etc (and they regress into subs, usually). Different from "Hard exterior", kind of like a sister to that category.
I would not remove categories or try to consolidate them. The point of it is just to be funny, so trying to make it completely strict and too condensed makes it not funny and too boring. The more categories also makes it more accurate anyway while making it funny. I would recommend you add more categories if anything. And Blaze's category also should not be removed (recommendation, make more categories like Blaze's).