>>300280
That poses a different set of problems to it though. They have the same mentality but instead of huddling around
one cult leader they'll do it around various that get propped up and then fall one after another, never with a short enough period of time for them to collapse under their own weight.
Gradually that kind of system will break down but it's almost like a more decentarlized version of the Red Guard since they can keep rotating figureheads and leaders in different arenas every couple years. In exchange for the weakness they get from various separate firebrands they gain the strength in being able to bounce back from a lot more than they otherwise could've
and get to play with more subversive tactics. The biggest benefit is that if things ever get
too out of control the larger numbers can pull support and focus on someone else instead. Of course, they won't do this until it's too late, which is quickly happening to BLM as despite having a more and better decentralized structure, there's just too many radical aspects and damaged goods involved.
For vidya, I see the transition of Phil Fish to Zoe Quinn to the current prop of Nina Freeman as the same exact thing repeated in different terms. For larger ones you've got figures like Rebecca Watson and Anita, though due to her longer term and success (3-4 years, FemFreq business) she's become very difficult to replace and has run over wannabe contenders like Suey Park. The biggest problem being faced there is that as she continues to collapse and tighten her base with more radical ideas, there's going to be a vacuum and nobody's really proven capable of taking it.
A lot of that is just musings in my head but I think it's fairly consistent with reality. They ultimately become a decentralized Red Guard and while it takes longer, it works better, especially in our society versus China's 50 years ago.