>>321910
>Why Rapp?
Honestly?
My money's that it's a mix of coincidence and the Rapp defense force who attacked Nintendo over firing her without knowing the story.
Take a look.
https://archive.is/gzlzx
https://archive.is/Qc0T7
https://archive.is/Fv24a
The drama around Rapp's pedo defense thesis came around
after the first archive and a few days before the second. Then there's a steady drip until it became publicly known on kiwi.
You can see other archives for the dates but the fact is archiving had already begun well before she got fired, even before her last controversy with Nintendo. What seems likely is that somebody looking for escorts found her, realized who she was, and began archiving. Maybe one of the people who gave her a low rating.
This person could've revealed the facts anytime they wanted to. Archives from February 14th says if he wanted to start drama back then, he could've.
If he wanted to start it from her pedo defense, he could've, that was late February and early March. He didn't. He may be who tipped off Nintendo on the second job to get her fired but
still didn't reveal the truth to anyone else and it was kept as private information.
Only after things were getting out of hand and people were attacking Nintendo did the information get released. Based on this timing, I'm led to believe that
this is what prompted the release of information as a direct response. If people want to know the true reason why Nintendo fired her and not try to fault them, this was the only way he could do it.