>>31890
that's really smart. with a bit of testing getting really good results.
very cute gens too
>>31882
I experimented a bit with looking at what some of the neg tags did in positive prompt and then comparing with and without those tags in neg. chromatic aberration seemed not actually useful, I think there are too many good images in the dataset with that tag for it to be meaningful. it was almost the same as negging amazing quality, composition would just change a bit without being better.
neg artistic error seemed to make an improvement. blank page also suprisingly good in neg.
having both worst quality and bad quality in the negs also seemed to make it adhere to the prompt a little less without a quality bump.
in no particular order, I found these neg tags to be good: lowres, artistic error, film grain, worst quality, very displeasing, dithering, halftone, screentone, canvas texture, stippling (texture), signature, watermark, simple background
there's also a huge difference in tag behaviour between 4.5 full and curated. I accidentally did some testing on curated and it did not transfer at all.
>>31883
this is interesting. I'm still a bit confused about -1::tag:: in the positive prompt. but -1::sketch:: definitely turns up the detailing by a lot!
>>31889
I used to go for DPM++ 2M or 2Sa, but euler a seems like the only usable one now