>>31176
>Nice try, but you are hurting your own argument and favoring my own in your own post.
No, i literally pointed out the fact in my previous post that having leftist social values doesn't imply an attraction to an specific set of fetishistic content. This is true the other way around too, for the sake of clarity.
>but for this specific topic it suffices
No, an appeal to vague genetic components that somehow divides the entirety of humanity within the two options of the political landscape of the us doesn't suffice, it doesn't explain or come close to begin explaining the varied aspects of human sexuality nor the particular aspects related to this fetish. You are literally implying humans are genetic machines that are coded since birth to vote elephant or donkey, and that it somehow is also related to fetishes in a way that just so happens to add to the narrative of the """right""" for the particular political landscape of western countries in the current year, never mind the fact this crude analysis doesn't hold to scrutiny in historical or foreign contexts. Maybe communists in cuba are secret bbc fetishists, right.
>You and other lefitsts
This is where you show your hand, your intentions are quite clear, instead of trying to argue in good faith, you are adamant about painting everyone with the fetish you don't like as "genetic leftists". This is the conclusion you arrived at the start and you are merely trying to rationalize your way out of that with faulty logic regarding incomplete genetic studies on politics, a lot of them don't even replicate. Just to be clear, i am not a leftists and others reading this will probably tell you the same thing, they are not leftists either.
>it is leftist publications that put out dozens of articles on 'how to be a good cuck'
Now that you are being picky and bad faith, you should realize the fact we are not talking about cuckoldry here, we are talking about a very specific fetish that at best is subset of cuckoldry. You will never see any publication of any kind talking about BNWO. They will even say this kind of fetishes are dehumanizing for blacks, that is besides the point anyways.
>I am here because I thought this was an actual 'interracial' board that served what 'interracial' is in a broad possible meaning
It only takes a banner or the sticky to realize that is not the case. Why do you feel the need to lie? Aren't you the same guy that is arguing that porn itself is a leftist thing? You must be a fellow genetic leftist too then if you are looking for porn and interracial porn at that (low in group preference)
>Also, leftists don't believe in white replacement? Do you really believe that?
Yes, they quite literally say that and argue that all of the time. You must be able to read their minds if you doubt they are being sincere. You actually believe people that disagree politically with you are not uninformed but literally evil too? Pick a struggle man.
>Leftists came up with the term 'Demographics is destiny' to sum up their perceptions of what their longterm outlook on their preferred political party is
I doubt your average leftist knows who Comte is, i doubt that quotes is specifically talking about race, i doubt all or even most leftist agree with the meaning you are trying to assign to the quote here or with the quote itself within its original meaning. Are you able see how this looks from the outside? You are grasping at straws.
>They obviously know and the more you leftists post such obvious lies about yourselves in order to protect the image you have conjured up for yourselves, the more you discredit whatever you say here
Stop projecting, nobody is trying to protect an image here, except maybe you, why are you so pissy about the topic? If everyone here is a leftists except you why do you believe anyone would be trying to protect an image here? From whom? The neutral third party casually browsing this thread filled to the brim with black on white sexual imagery?
Message too long. Click
here
to view full text.