>>36552 I'm not necessarily talking about recent times. Jazz was pretty big once upon a time, there's also RnB in 80s and 90s though it wasn't really big with white people like rap and jazz. There were some pretty popular black pop artists too like Michael Jackson. >>36558 Nine times out of ten, a white woman who strictly goes for guys is probably a whore. Especially if her only reasoning for like them is because of their dicks.

>>36551 Logic mainly based on the fact that Africans had like 3x the population, which was almost entirely armed with superior weapons (bowmen vs spearthrowers lol). That leads to everything under general war readiness (more pop = more conflicts = more experience) being significantly more advanced. Europeans mostly beefed between each other whenever hunting the same animals. Only the occasional large conflict over like a nice valley once every x amount of years (i.e. seasonal and sporadic). Africans had less uncontested zones, so a type of early guerilla warfare was actively practiced. We can keep going into more niche factors but you get the idea. If you were asking more like WHY the Africans would wipe the Europeans - I'd assume the whole sudden resource sharing with weird looking people part wouldn't be taken diplomatically by either side, so it'd be no different than just a much larger scale tribal (but actually racial) conflict Even if we equal the population numbers for some reason, Africans still would've had the genetic advantage. Traces of Neanderthal DNA make Europeans stockier/shorter + 10s of thousands of years of evolution for colder climates. Sure, the differences weren't as stark as today, but we know they were there at the very least. That and Africans having developed poison arrows/darts at the time - no such thing for Europeans yet. I'm no anthropologist, but the facts/evidence we have from so long ago ain't much and the conclusions are cut and dry. Was doing some research of my own while writing and came across an interesting piece - apparently we don't have any direct evidence of 'aggressive' spiritualism by Africans for that period, while a good portion of European sites come with evidence of cannibalism/scalping/skull-cups. We do have evidence of infant graves and constant red ochre use (for fertility) in African sites from back then though. So I'd keep assuming that the Africans would almost certainly keep at least a few females for their fertility obsession + comparatively more enlightened spiritualism and stronger kinship. This bit also kinda answered my question on how the mulatto offspring would be accepted by the Africans

>>36637 TLDR but the second the west stops sending aid and food to Africa they will suffer massively from starvation.

>>36637 What would you say changed that lead the Europeans to end up becoming much more advanced?

>>36670 Has to be the fact that Africans remained largely tribal and fragmented, while Europeans started developing civilizations with specific focuses + politics. Thracians, Celts, Greeks, Romans etc. The trade-focus got them goods from developed societies like the Egyptians/Turks to get the wheels turning. Arms focus from the Central EU barbarians, then later militaristic focus from Ancient Greeks; and the African's days were numbered till we got to the colonization bit. Theoretically if the Africans weren't naturally so low IQ, and also had more of a reason to venture north, they would've developed much more advanced civilizations and eventually conquered Europe before the Greeks/Romans propped up. >>36543 race realism do be going both ways though, exactly why this fetish is so fucking hot. Most other fetishes' popularity groyperls down to breaking societal tabboos (domination-submission mostly), which were core for society to evolve, while I'd argue the only reason interracial didn't explode earlier was an innate male fear of a rare biological tabboo getting exposed during a period of social progress (i.e. when modern-ish porn was growing, post-1950s). Imagine the post-2011 or 2016 or 2020s growth of BBC (including offshoots like chastity/bnwo/cuckold/hypno) combined with the civil rights movements between the 50s and 60s. Our world would've been veeeeeery different by now. Also exactly why racism is rooted in biology and will be around for thousands of years to come - we are naturally afraid of Africans due to their sexual/sensual prowess threatening our existence, while Africans are afraid of Whites due to a massive rift in intelligence (incl. handywork, tactics, technology, coordination etc.) threatening their existence. Gay, scat, feet, bdsm, fur, you name it - can't hold a candle to BBC. Memes aside, it's genuinely closest to bestiality, except rooted in realism, rather than fantasy. Combined with the accessibility/free choice for sex between White and Black men, rather than just Men and Animals - of course the thought is terrifying for most whites. The only way blacks don't come out as victors after 100-1000 years would be if they have a generational fumble. And they almost certainly will fumble because they're so naturally simple and instinctive, like glorified pets/tools for ((anyone)) with a brain

>>25312 That's not what that study is saying, it's saying that even discounting socio-economic differences, which usually lead people to be less careful, white wife-black husband couples are still more likely to have UNINTENDED pregnancies. It doesn't mean the sperm is more likely to cause pregnancy, but that they're more likely to do it without protection even if they weren't intending to have kids.

>>36552 billboard isnt a barometer of quality, i feel like you arent white so i wont continue talking to you

>>36519 >>36529 >>36543 >>36637 >>36639 >>36670 >>36685 >>36687 OP here. This thread is getting too far off course. Like I said before. This is a thread for quality information sources. Having half assed discussions with no data or quotes except half baked ideas of history combined with twitter goon Blacked images is shitting up the discourse here and ruining the thread. Either post quotes from books or studies or shut up. I hope the mods will help kneecap these conversations from here on out.

>>36691 Report the posts then, I just see individual posts slide by from day to day and don't take action if there isn't anything overtly unacceptable. Anything sensitive to context is gonna have to be pointed out.

>>36670 Not inherently. But it is indicative of who is having success in the industry, which is dictated by what many people find to be quality. What I was saying anyway, was that black people are over represented in the American music industry, but rap is obviously their forte. I wasn’t saying that I think the music is of high quality (I don’t) I am white, though I was never replying to you specifically.

>>36691 What are you even talking about, it's literally a discussion about a hypothetical in regards to "black sexual and physical prowess" in human history. Fits your OP to a T. I could link boring scientific wall of text sources for whatever facts I mentioned earlier, sure, but random animistic cave drawings and artifacts pics wouldn't really get your neurons going like Black Men Fuck More graph #8973, would they? Would also love for anyone to provide me something more concrete than half-baked ideas of history during the Mesolithic/Paleolithic eras on an interracial board. Or, you could be less of a whiny bitch and actually provide something to the conversation to either shut my half-baked ideas up, or provide something more thoughtful to the topic. If the mods want to make this board even more dead and leave the street shitters to hold discussions, I'd be more than happy to dip for good. 3 dogshit-quality goon replies per month like in 2024 is more preferable than a short semi-relevant conversation you can ignore for a few days, I guess? Also curious to see the fuck you've been doing to keep this thread healthy and relevant in the last year, oh revered OP lol

>>36685 >it's genuinely closest to bestiality Wtf? Not surprised, but I'm guessing you're on that side of this fetish.

>>36713 Cringe American NPC left/right generalities aside, which fetish would you say BBC (i.e. mainstream shit like Blacked) compares to the most? BDSM mainly fits the offshoots like cuck/chastity, so that's clearly not the root

>>36782 That's a good question. I've always thought of normal interracial porn as just the same as normal same race porn. There was a taboo element to it for several decades, but that was when race relations were worse than it currently is now.

Why can't black men cum? >Black men had significantly lower semen volume, sperm concentration and total motile sperm counts than White and Hispanic/Latino men. >Semen parameters were very similar between Hispanic/Latino and White men, but Black men had significantly lower values for semen volume and sperm concentration. Percent motile sperm was also slightly lower in Black men, although the difference was not statistically significant. Consequently total sperm count and total motile sperm count were almost 50% lower for Black men compared to men in the other two groups (P<0.0001). Morphology showed little difference by race/ethnicity. The percentage of men with semen volume, sperm concentration and total sperm count below current WHO reference values (WHO, 2010) was greater for Black men compared to White and Hispanic/Latino men (Appendix 2). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3812375/

>>36962 There are studies that show that more attractive men have lower sperm production due to some sort of evolutionary trade off in mating strategy. >UCL researchers discover attractive males release fewer sperm >Attractive males release fewer sperm per mating to maximise their chances of producing offspring across a range of females, according to a new paper on the evolution of ejaculation strategies. >The findings by researchers at UCL and the University of Oxford suggest that, paradoxically, matings with attractive males may be less fertile than those with unattractive ones. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2009/jul/ucl-researchers-discover-attractive-males-release-fewer-sperm >Consistent with previous voice research, women judged lower pitched voices as more masculine and more attractive. However men with lower pitched voices did not have better semen quality. On the contrary, men whose voices were rated as more attractive tended to have lower concentrations of sperm in their ejaculate. These data are more consistent with a trade off between sperm production and male investment in competing for and attracting females, than with the phenotype-linked fertility hypothesis. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0029271

An article on the perceptions of blacks in South Africa. Has a couple of interesting parts. First, was white boys were afraid to play rugby against blacks because they seemed impervious to harm. Second is a white woman who wrote an entire story about falling in love with a black activist after seeing her black maid having sex with a black guy and imagining herself with him. https://sci-hub.ru/https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/pcs.2010.38

>>36637 Ötzi is proof that Europeans fought a lot. Pleanty of proof of cannibal tribes in Europe - both Neanderthal and human. Whenever a cannibal tribe would win a conflict, they'd eat even the bone marrow. They drank from the skulls of their enemies - these kinds of remnants still survive. Other stone age conflicts would have likely ended in animals just eating those that wouldn't be carried. Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck at the cusp of the Bronze age? Only 5% of the Y-chromosomes survived in most races. Sub-Saharans still retain a wider range of variance, as do the Native Americans - though they had earlier bottlenecks. These two races are the more popular ones in women's eyes, as sex tourists prove. Even admixture is enough to become hot in women's eyes - like Southern Italians. Women may just want a larger y-chromosome variance, having grown bored, hateful or scared of the known types. A big dick helps, but there's a reason they aren't all hogging the BWC types.

This has always been a fascination

>>18753 >pointing out the fact that study is retarded >cope

>>36558 A lot of the elements are LARP but it's all rooted in truth. I'm in my 40s now and grew up in California. Every female family member and friend has hooked up with a black guy at least once (even if they were outwardly racist, would never date a black guy, or family would forbit it, etc). White, Asian, Latina - all of them. My sister told me it's something young women try/sample like it's pineapple on pizza or something. She said the one black guy she hooked up with wasn't anything special, but she still ultimately fucked a black dude out of memes, curiosity, and YOLO. Nobody treats or even thinks about white/latino/med dudes that way in the US. Almost all of the "I only like sex with black guys" and "I only like huge cocks" shit is for white male fantasy, but the average woman in the US definitely has "bang a black guy with a big dick" on her sexual bucket list. Unless you're obviously into it, she's never, ever going to tell you and will aggressively deny it if asked.

>>37712 I've said this before, but if you're a black who's looking for a genuine connection, it would suck to treated as a sample to once and never again. It is what it is though.

>>37712 This is true, but it's not really the same as the fantasy that women all lust for black men and that once they have one, it's all they ever want, which fuels a lot of the posts here.

>>37742 Yeah agreed. The common female version of this fantasy is "I'm curious and want to be a little naughty once by defying social norms" not "I want to end the white race"

>>37742 As much as Freud was full of shit, he seems to have hit a kernel of truth when it comes to penis envy, which appears to be the driving force for this fetish from the male perspective (it definitely is for me).

>>37712 "Unless you're obviously into it, she's never, ever going to tell you and will aggressively deny it if asked." Yep, you have to go out of your way to make them feel like they won't be judged for their admission. If they were as porn-brained/horny as men, they would simply expose themselves. Given that there is a small sample of women taking testosterone nowadays (not for trooning out, but for restoring normal sexual function), I wonder if these broads would be open about their sexual escapades.

>>37751 penis envy is supposed to be a female psychosexual stage, it doesn't pertain to males genius

Interesting part of a study I found. The main study wasn't focused on black men, but on outgroup identity attraction that was more social based. However there was one study that did include black men where the author was establishing a sexuality index based on women's perceptions of men as highly sexual and good in bed. Black men came out on top. https://trace.tennessee.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=2313&context=utk_gradthes

>>18688 I'm surprised this study hasn't been posted yet “Big Black Cocks” & Interracial Attraction: A Quantitative Study on Stereotypes in Pornography & Black Men’s Sexualities Malmo University in Sweden https://mau.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1794168

>>38937 I would have found it hot, but as expected, she's a rejected landwhale. https://www.facebook.com/iidasophiaceo/about/

>>36782 Swingers, the answer to that question is swingers. Amongst white folks, it's a fetish for far right men (women are much more sexually racist than previously thought and they usually g for white men if they date out anyway) who are afraid of other races and want to preserve the family unit. Since people sexualize their biggest taboos and fears, it becomes obvious who's most into this stuff as far as white people goes. As for other races go, it's mostly Indian dudes who usually have no clue where they stand in the hierarchy and the black dudes who have a fetish for white women.

>>38937 Probably because it’s a student thesis which says pretty much nothing other than “people like it when others say they have bids cocks”

>>38971 Do you have any science or reason on why people sexualize their biggest taboos and fears? I don't think it's that common and mostly extreme outliers.

Any old things about white gay boys loving BBC?

>>39108 This is not a request thread. Do your own research