>>4002 Given two options, the more depressing one is often the true one. I don't think this is real.

Aren't printers supposed to have a built in dot pattern anyways? But it's not supposed to be visible to the naked eye.

I don't understand how they would work. This could be used to tell real ballots apart from fake ones, but how it it help if somebody took a bunch of real ballots, filled them out fraudulently and then counted them?

>>4011 Yeah that's the thing it's apparent that it wouldn't be enough considering all the dead people voting and other dubious activity. However, if say a state actor got wind of the design and started flooding fake ballots into contested areas it would be pretty fuckin' clutch

Americans scream tyranny makes you safe, but reporters, lawyers, protesters, spies, homosexuals, potheads, beggars, Christians, gun-owners, and business people are arrested in a police state and murderers and thieves run the prisons.