May the session spammers not come here.

>>8378 I think someone made a board specifically to contain session spamming, lol.

>>8377 >>8378 >>8379 Sorry about jumping the gun yesterday with that deletion. I had been informed that these threads were used specifically to share CP, and had just witnessed the thread on /b/ being deleted by global moderation. These threads will be allowed so long as they stay within the rules. Session links will be deleted and banned.

What did happen here?

>>8400 I was expecting a husky dressed as a grandmother, not this.

>>8401 What about now?

>>8400 Not a clue.

this board is so fucking slow

>>8414 We can make it not slow.

>>8420 How /cun/ was fun but now 4chan is back it'll just be there

>>8433 >sample

Is finding video/photo reference to practice drawing impossible unless you're japanese?

>>8441 Did you mean to post this in the /momcest/ thread on /h/ or something? Or maybe the willy board /sm/?

>>8377 For some anons, it was like the Trail of Tears For us, it's like the Trail of Cunny I guess this is it, this is our home

guess this is our home now. The fuck happened in /b/?

>>8451 Repeated breaking of global rules resulted in the thread being nuked by global moderation.

>>8451 global mods nuking /cun/ because of the discussion of 3dpd it's understandable but annoying because then I get the blame even though I haven't banned a single person for loli

>>8462 it's alright. we gathered those we could and made a group on S until the mods calm down about it. or until they dont and we'll just continue with what we do yknow

>>8463 I'm a mod myself there but I can't really do much to protect the thread, I can understand vamp getting crappy about it due to it attracting actual pedos. If I was BO I would just patrol the thread instead of nuking it. However at the end of the day it's not my board it's Vamp's and he makes the last call. Most I can do is just avoid them. You're probably just better off making /cun/ threads here since I don't think his stance will change. All I can really do is apologise for it.

>>8464 Most I can do is just ignore them*

>>8466 >on where? 8/b/ >No it's fine, like i said, it will continue until morale improves, until mods calm down or we'll just stay on sess and post an image or two here without the "evil discussion" so to speak I guess that's fine then

>>8472 But morale is already sky high, after all, you got banned again!

Guess it's time to improve morale a bit.

>>8474 Here's an idea, why don't you call the threads cuteness appreciation threads?

>>8451 The cunnybros went to /b/ first, because loli was legal in 4 /b/. But the mods start getting asshurt from all the loli and Ai gen threads. I'm sure there some mods that understand our situation and that these threads were use for a rally point for all the refugees. >>8464 You had a global mod that recently made a board called /ausch/ and sent one of /cun/ threads there with a star gold post calling us a jew. Like WTF? Oh boy, nothing make me feel more welcome like knowing there's a global mod who's a neo-nazis. The more I spent time on this site, the more I understand how the moderation work on this site. If it's one thing I learn is that we need to stay in our lanes. I seen how fast some of those boards are on 8chan, they can jerk themselves off in their dead board for all I care. I bet they will be asshurt again if loli become a top board.

>>8463 Knowing there's a group waiting to come over makes me want to make a parody of the song "All My Rowdy Friend Coming Over Tonight" and call it "All My Cunny Frens Coming Over Tonight".

I would like to ask you a few questions. I have searched all over the Internet, but I cannot find any “places to draw and exchange loli illustrations without requests”. Is the place to exchange through loli illustrations in the English-speaking world already almost extinct? If there are places where these activities are active, I would like to know about them.

>>8476 >You had a global mod that recently made a board called /ausch/ and sent one of /cun/ threads there with a star gold post calling us a jew. Never knew about this damn wtf, I thought those threads were allowed there since they aren't really breaking any rules (for the most part) Although i'm a cuckfugee myself so I'm not too knowledgeable on the people whom run this site kek

>>8481 From what I learned, you have global rules which is "Don't do illegal shit". Then you got the board owners and volunteers who got their own rules and if you don't like them, then you just leave. The reason why I assume a global mod did that is because I'm not 100% sure if board owners got the power to send threads to another board. Do I know 8oldfags are having a culture shock. /a/ board owner recently quit, because of all the refugees. All I know is that the refugees out numbered the old guards so it's going to be interesting how this is played out.

>>8475 Used by pedos before that were even more egregious. If someone makes that thread I will nuke it on sight. >>8476 >But the mods start getting asshurt from all the loli and Ai gen threads. No, the thread repeatedly broke global rules. Loli and AI is fine on /b/, and it was global moderation that deleted the thread. Ban/Deletion logs are public. >You had a global mod that recently made a board called /ausch/ and sent one of /cun/ threads there with a star gold post calling us a jew. This is news to me, and doesn't feel like standard procedure. As >>8482 said, it could have been at the request of the BO, however he doesn't hate loli and I've dumped it on /b/ before for years, which means these threads must have done something else to piss him off if that's the case. I'll ask the admins and /b/ about it.

>>8484 So it seems Vamp did request the thread be moved to /ausch/ for funsies. That was not a decision of global moderation. He also recently change the rules to ban porn dump threads, which this thread mostly was, however, that just seems like a gay excuse to not micromanage the GR1 violating posts that regularly occur in this thread. What is a global decision, was globally deleting this thread once, but then not doing so again. I presume Global moderation changed their decision, which is why this thread isn't nuked here and on /ausch/, because they decided nuking a thread over one or two shitters was jumping the gun.

>>8484 Is there anymore names we should be aware of? That way we can avoid the instant nuke? >>8487 >GR1 violating posts that regularly occur in this thread As a newfag, I was would like description of GR1 violating posts so I can be aware and also inform other anons who could also be new about GR1.

>>8489 >I was would like description of GR1 violating posts The global rules are linked at the top and bottom of every page. Due to the nature of this board and /b/, and to discourage people who want to continuously break GR1 and GR2 from coming here, both boards have even more restrictive anti-pedo rules as the first local rule. Further, as I cannot verify all links, and people in these threads have explicitly talked about sharing illegal materials via links posted in these threads, I have had to add local rule 9 and lock the circlejerk shilling thread. >other anons who could also be new about GR1 Negro, are you serious? Global Rule 1 is literally "Don't break the law." >Is there anymore names we should be aware of? Can't recall any off the top of my head, and besides, I don't think anon's choice is (((pure coincidence))). He was likely well aware of what that thread title meant when he suggested it, which only pushes me one inch closer to blacklisting these threads.

>>8490 >Further, as I cannot verify all links, and people in these threads have explicitly talked about sharing illegal materials via links posted in these threads, I have had to add local rule 9 and lock the circlejerk shilling thread. Verifying links, that shit sucks. That totally understandable. Of course anybody talking about sharing illegal materials is a glownigger and should be ignored(and reported). >Negro, are you serious? Global Rule 1 is literally "Don't break the law." Of course I know that, but the meta broad said about keeping the hosting company happy which is a total different ball game. Since things are always changing in the world, it would be nice to have an update about GR1 and keeping the hosting company happy. >I don't think anon's choice is (((pure coincidence))) That's how they name their loli threads on 4/b/, I don't know what to tell you. It's just a thread to rally people from /b/ and also a meta thread to talk about the board and rules. But if you do decided to pull the trigger and blacklist these threads, then we should have at least a meta thread.

>>8491 I think talking about sharing and simply discussing either the existence of it or other adjacent subjects that are somewhat relevant should be allowed to some degree. This zero tolerance nuke approach isn't helpful to really anyone or anything. I'd rather hear directly from the hosting company rather than hear or be spoken to from the perspective of someone interpreting the hosting company and its SPECIFIC concerns, wishes and whatnot. We've had all sorts of names for them in the past and currently. Depending on who makes them, it is pure coincidence or not, hard to tell but i guess that's the crux of it all. Once again i think being on the side of good faith and tolerating a degree of shitposting regardless of what it disguises, is more optimal than the supposed current approach. This is not something i believe can be fully contained, many before have tried and all have failed. You can have the blacklist approach but all that does is delay the inevitable. It's alright for a time perhaps to put up a dam, so to speak but, long-term? Definitely not.

>>8492 >I think talking about sharing and simply discussing either the existence of it or other adjacent subjects that are somewhat relevant should be allowed to some degree. This board is for cartoon porn, not discussion of 3DPD. The same policy has always applied to other 2D boards to a lesser degree, and those boards discuss 3DPD little if ever, far less than the supposed "good faith pedos" that always try to set up shop on loli boards. The /hebe/ experiment has been tried and failed, and it left this board and /b/ with the necessity of the zero tolerance policy. Good faith has already been repeatedly abused here. If you think it's inevitable and uncontainable, you can fuck off to somewhere else like the darknet. You are not welcome here.

>>8492 I say we head over to /animu/ and call it a fucking day. They allow loli. At least the board owner is run by a 4channer so I trust him. >>7688 Look this circle jerk thread. They merged an older thread to it and then locked it. It got a thread with links to groupchats for 4 fucking years and the board owner didn't had a problem with it until 4chan refugees start coming over here. Since then they been running a tight ship all of the sudden. I'm going to be blunt. I starting to not trust board owner and I don't think we are welcomed here. The red flag should of been when the board owner had a problem with our rally thread name.

>>8494 >It got a thread with links to groupchats for 4 fucking years This board was abandoned until late last year. Many of the shill thread links are explicitly about 2D only, and it wasn't until this thread appeared that there was any discussion of using links to share CP. It was a non-issue until now. But yes, please take your very likely pedo circlejerk, which I and the globals have probably already humored too much, to some other site. I'm sure they'll love you over there much more.

>>8493 I know what it's for but you cannot deny the reality, as you yourself argue, that there's overlap in the venn diagram and that simply talking about that subject without explicitly stating things about desire or possibility of sharing anything, i think should be allowed to a degree because people shouldn't get banned or fear getting banned for simply mentioning "that which shall not be named". Something you're doing right now for example would be bannable when i argue it shouldn't be. I think it's still just kicking the can down the road and not actually solving anything, very few zero tolerance policies ever do, this one included, i would say. I dont think it is inevitable or uncontainable, i dont think reasonable minds can disagree that it is so objectively speaking

>>8494 Perhaps. I just really dislike this game of whack a mole that mods with a vengeance feel the need to perpetuate all day everyday forever because "personally, i'm tired of it". I would accept a genuinely sound reason stated by the hosting company themselves like; "Hey, we have fucking gorillions of complaints about this shit being so prominent on your site that it's starting to look like that's all you people do, cut that shit out immediately, nigga, or find some good long term solution, or we say bye bye" but like, in corpo-speak ofc

>>8494 It does seem like blatant hypocrisy or at least some weird sudden change of heart that can only be easiest explained by infiltration, possibly by personal vendettas that grew during the days after the hack

>>8496 >I know what it's for but you cannot deny the reality, as you yourself argue, that there's overlap in the venn diagram and that simply talking about that subject without explicitly stating things about desire or possibility of sharing anything, i think should be allowed to a degree Then go to ATF. They have a subforum specifically dedicated to this. These discussions can never thrive on an imageboard that doesn't want to openly break the law on the subject, because the pedos inevitably begin sharing CP. Such discussion can only be had on an account based site where moderation can be more easily enforced. >>8497 >It's okay to post and/or link CP until someone reports it to the host I've had enough. /hebe/ niggers go home. These threads are now blacklisted. This thread will remain locked as an example and further threads will be deleted on sight with bans.