https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tF1VPIV9CsY >>17304 >>17305 It's a shame Hunt disappeared 2 years ago after his identity was discovered. Then his one-of-a-kind prototype-turned race car F40 that featured in vid related burned to the ground a year later.

>>17312 aww why did the identity count so much? I mean it's Ucuck but is the government the problem?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyYBzGFZu38 >>17305 >>17312 >>17319 More drift

>>17319 The UK probably has some law against reckless driving, even if it's on "private property".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jB7-0QehTE Is there anything in the world of wheeled machines that's better than the fun machine incarnate, aka the buggy? I don't think so.

>>17312 he still has his secret second youtube channel and some of the stuff is pretty nice but nothing like taxtherich100

So they're going to be making 50 of the not-R36. In a weird Bayside Blue/Gold full body two-tone no less.

>>17417 would ride

>>17079 Black Mans Wheels are for niggers and pedophiles. >>17058 Is that some pop up headlights I see? >>14907 German car owners man. >yfw the LED headlights they all have are way higher colour temperature than the UK regulation but they get off scott free

A lil truck aesthetic contest just for kicks: Cabover (flat) or conventional (long nose)?

>>17490 Aestheticwise, long nose From a practical standpoint, cabover.

Oh hey, remember that Stratos concept from 2010 that everyone hoped Lancia would make and never did, based on an earlier Stratos concept from 2005 that everyone hoped Lancia would make and never did? Looks like we'll be getting 25 production examples after all, nearly a decade since the concept's debut. 2 have already been built. Shame about the headlights though.

Anyone ever noticed how decent styling Dacia Duster actually has? It does not look overdesigned like everything else these days, lights on it are practical and manage to look good, and they apparently let a 12year old with scissors in their blueprint room and now they have a pickup coming out this year. I refuse to call that a pickup truck, that's a pickup car

>>17738 sauce on that? I really doubt it's FCA building these so I'm wondering how they got to do that. I agree with you about the headlights, that's pretty sad, even if now it looks like a micro Ferrari. >>17740 The first one looked less bulky and seemed less cheap imo. As for the pick-up car (nice name), I hate the height of the car belt. And it keeps going higher throughout the car until the rear end, which makes the whole design look absurd.

>>17741 >sauce http://archive.is/VYVIu http://archive.is/W1AJb http://archive.is/Z9zLg It's not Fiat themselves (since they haven't done anything fun on their own accord since the Coupé), but it's a private company that have already delivered a little of their proposed goods. No real difference between it and the last few years of X1/9s (which were badged and sold as Bertones since Fiat were no longer interested in selling them). And the Ferrari resemblance is intentional; they're based on the running gear of the F430. The original Stratos did have a Ferrari engine, so it's not entirely unprecedented. Maybe one customer will be daring enough to retrofit pop-ups.

Who's your Valentine, /o/?

>>17746 My riced out German shitbox.

>>17740 Go to bed James, you're drunkposting again.

>>17746 I was supposed to ride my bike hard but the chain snapped halfway through

Found this on /tv/

>>17768 Ain't got nothin' on my pristine French Royal Cheese fueled with Heineken beer.

Bike engines might be easy to understand, but then you stumble on a bolt rusted in so tight it breaks yor screwdriver.

Anyone else think the F40 is the rare exception where pop-up headlamps just look, I don't know, wrong? For years I thought what are actually the high beams/foglamps were the full headlights. Even now it's a mindfuck.

>>17834 Still looks kind of cool, though.

>>17834 I've never seen that car before but it looks so familiar

>>17834 I was going to say it was the angle, but you might be right.

>>17831 Still trying too tear the thing apart, just found out about 3 screws behind the clutch plate. Found them 10 minutes after i made a gap between both sides about 1cm wide. Now trying to figure out should i try to undo the screws or just keep spreading both pieces apart until the screws hold together nothing.

>>17846 I'm afraid rebuilding the metal after the screws are destroyed would be a bit tough

>>17847 I did not take up on restoring a 1960s soviet bike because it's easy. I will do it because it's cheap. And i really wanted to get into real vintage shit, none of that casual 90s japanese bike business Seriously, those things were thrash quality, but simple to fix even half a century later. No exotic parts, the carbuerator needle is really the only thing you have to figure out yourself, as everyone offers different ideas. Those 3 bolts were probably not mandatory anyway, will keep you updated.

Is anyone else absolutely disgusted by how this thing looks?

>>17849 Seeing all the crossovers every day made me immune. >>17848 I'll be waiting

>>17850 Cracked it open finally, only to find a /gore/ worthy scene. The crankshaft and connecting rod were completely bust. Guess that sitting in water for some years with no oil does a number on old parts. Will look for a replacement engine or maybe parts if they are available, but no sooner than late May. I also found out in some instruction manuals that i manged to translate from moonrunes to human letters that it runs on 63 gasoline. Sixty-fucking-three. Not sure where i am supposed to get that. Lowest i can get here is 95. Will still try to restore the frame/wheels/brakes in the meantime. Will probably but some chink 2-stroke bike kit and jam it on there. The other bike i will be trying to restore is a Minsk 125 from late 80s, it at least is supposed to run on 92 gasoline. It will accept 95 just fine. And the engine and wheels actualy turn, which is a good sign.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYdvcqAc-88 >Jumping >Wheelies >Trucks are tough as nails, crashing doesn't end the race Thoughts?

>>17953 That's why they just call them Shelby now. Even though Carroll Shelby is dead and has nothing to do with the cars anymore.