>early 2000s >eclipse You mean the metal fish that replaced the one that appeared in Fast and Furious?

Government regulations and people buying shitty crossovers got us here. It will only get worst. If the electric car is "the future" then can they at least stop making them all as ugly as they can. Do they need to stand out so much that you can spot the ugly things from a mile away? It's like with Hybrids when they came out, make it "stand out" so people know you're "saving the earth"

>>18122 while OP is a whiny faggot, this is true.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vMW3Q7TQars Shameful

>>18105 I said the same in the 90's and 2000's. They all look the same.

>>18108 >metal fish Nothing wrong with metal catfish.

I yearn for the timeline we left.

>>18122 It's on it's way my dude. Too bad the technology itself is still garbage. They claim 220-470 km range, depending on temperature and if it's city or highway, but we all know that's a scam, like pretty much everything about EVs right now. God save us once EU bans sale of new petrol cars, I imagine the price of old never-rusting 205 1.9 diesels skyrockets.

>>18313 >208 That's a completely fucking new car. It should be called the 209, and the only reason I can imagine it isn't, is because of someone at Peugeot deciding a rebadged Talbot did not deserve the name of "306", so they called it the 309 instead. Also there's no mistaking it, it's fucking huge compared to its predecessors. The 205 and 206 were small cars. The 207 moved up slightly to the same size as the likes of the Civic and Astra Hatch, but it was still maneuverable enough to be a successor. This on the other hand looks like a lowered crossover. No illusion of compactness in any form, this thing is huge and they know it.

>>18122 Honda has the right idea

>>18434 I suppose so. This thing looks as normal as most modern cars look. Still ugly.

>>18434 Rims are too large and still looks a bit too angry. Concept looked better.