>>53062 It's hilarious they started with the feet musk and got around to the extreme loli tickle torture second.

>>53062 >DA is dying, great, less autists in the world and the VERY few good artists will move to Pixiv and be smart enough to post with J tags. DA only has like less than a 3rd the number of users on Pix + they're too retarded to use J tags so a lot of us won't rly see them anyways. (Someone, pls start collecting the few diabolically good arts that Triangles3 made; he's also done some loli in the past and might get banned) >Pixiv isn't about to start banning cause they'd die... very quickly. Everything seems better than usual tbh. I'm a lot more worried about Twitter tho, fuck that rich perfume-name guy. Also if they're banning fake children then they may as well ban FULL fledged furries too, cause those are fake animals. get rid of the more retarded stuff too.

>>53069 kinda based honestly

>>53062 Damn it really is over

>>53070 Deviantart has Been a hub for tickle art for decades, so many artists have lived and died there, now all their art shall be lost, like tears in rain.

>>52811 Pixiv is a decent dumping ground besides from R34 if your worry about losing stuff. Artist setting up shop there though is another thing.

Did DA's search function break?

>>53176 banning of fetish-related tags maybe?

>>52722 Who the fuck cares? DA hasn't been a good source for tickling art in ages.

>>52722 lol they're not going to do that. that's like 95% of their traffic. they do that, the site is going to die

>>53185 >exclusively post on dA and barely on twitter I'm very offended, I thought you liked my drawings

>>53236 Exclusive ≠ Good Art

>>53236 >gets buried under sea of shitty ms paint drawings, photo manips by creepy old people, and rp requests by confused 8-40 year olds in the search results Pick a different website.

Another one goes down...

>>53323 >yes but you see, I don't like the way he draws faces so uhhhh actually deviantart hasn't done anything wrong

With erimoto and boundbandit the latest casualties, it's clear there's pretty much nobody who's safe now. Eventually the only tickling accounts left will be people like homunculuslover and other 'sfw tickling' types. The next generation who come up who will naturally discover DA will only ever discover that kind of art and thus, a dark age is ushered in where non-con is considered a boomer abomination to be shunned and disregarded.

>>53331 >new generation If there isn't an outlet for artists to show their stuff, there wont be a new generation.

>>53331 didn't boundbandit only do super consensual type stuff? that being said, can someone in the UK beat the shit out of HL for us please.

>>53331 >where non-con is considered a boomer abomination to be shunned and disregarded. Isn't tickling inherently non-con? I guess artists either need to make more cutesy art or save their more degenerate stuff for stash.

>>53070 >DA only has like less than a 3rd the number of users on Pix Verifiebly untrue in the case of fetish art.

Bebop looks to have had quite a few pieces removed from his gallery, does anybody have an archive? Checked his pixiv and Twitter but they're not complete archives.

>>53331 Erimoto got her account back, had to delete some art, maybe DA counts actors in character as IRL people. who fuckin knows.

>>53392 Well on the plus side those low grade fakes might get axed.

Hi So I was wondering why I wasn't banned yet despite all my gallery being very noncon and 'le epic torment' oriented. My current theories are as follows : - Don't draw real people or or characters that very obviously look like real life people (TKGEEK, you are safe) - If you're going to draw "underage" charcters that are just cartoon and anime girls, they are to be sufficiently stylized to be unrecognizable from the source material such that they actually look at least barely legal - Stylized characters with no canonical ages or clear childlike settings ( Jimbo's Trixie, RS's Lotte) are fine - Put the strict (not moderate) mature tag over all your works, disclose it as 'nudity, adult content, ideologically insensitive. If children go onto dA and can see your work without creating an account, this can be seen as a bad thing to dA. - Properly tag your work as being fetish art in the first place so that it doesn't end at the mercy of normalfags who just wanted to see One Piece fanart -Leave the question of consent and sexuality unanswered. Try to stay away from evil sex rape dungeon setups and don't disclose the victim's feelings about it. Aka "TS JUST TICKLING GUYS NOTHING SEXUAL ABOUT IT!" This isn't confirmed in any way whatsoever, but I'm pretty sure at least a few of these are at play here. Stay safe

>>53545 my theory is that if you're afraid of getting banned, they'll come for you, and if you're waiting and hoping to get banned, then you won't.

DeviantArt should have been terminated with napalm in 2000 during its inception. Photography website KEKW. Meanwhile people post DMCA'd shit they didn't even edit when like 20 years back you'd get instahammered for this. Very DeviantAntiTheft much technology. I hope Elon Musk finishes his cyberbrainpads so we can annihilate the twittards for real this time.

>>53545 I’ll draw all the underaged cartoon girls I fucking want. No problem posting them on pixiv.

>>53392 How can you delete your art if your account is suspended or banned? I tried doing this but it wouldn't let me access any of my uploads at all.

>>53545 >TS JUST TICKLING GUYS NOTHING SEXUAL ABOUT IT You reminded me how much I hate those people like, clearly you're into it more than just "It cute"

>>53573 Could you please speak English like a normal person and not a 2012 meme because I want to see what you're attempting to say.

>>53782 2012-friendly version: Fuck deviantart and social media

throw in another one.

The art community has taught me that most artists use sites like DA or pixiv or twitter as their primary art storage and don't keep a local copy around.

>>53781 It's NOT sexual you fucking pervert! It's cute! Like paws! GOD you people are SUCH degenerates!

>>53792 Wait for deletion to make backups, lmao. Why someone would upload porn to deviantart is beyond me when there are so many alternatives that literally don't give a fuck about the whole fetish/underage cartoon drama because they are not hosted in Burgerland or Banada. >>53789 Well at least the point on Eclipse and AI is spot on I'll give them that. Pre-Eclipse DeviantArt was... acceptable. In 2000 you didn't have all the core/pro/sub/premium bullshit either when you wanted to post explicit fetish art on it, mature toggle wasn't even a thing and you didn't need an account at all to browse everything.