>>81804 A fundamental right for who? It's already insanely easy to ignore AI art and other "brainrot" if you really don't want to see it.

>>81768 Maybe i'm not some trilobite that consumes detritus shoveled out some soulless corporate machine that insist on charging me to use imagination and creativity. Go fuck yourself, or should I say go get your Iphone to fuck yourself.

>>81813 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7_I6kj9fTc

Personally, feetgen feels kinda revolutionary and it's most likely only gonna improve over time. Can't say much about NovelAi as I have not used it once. However, as fat as chatbots go, I feel like there wasn't that much development over the last months. The only ones improving seem to be spicychat.ai with their news model. That costs money though.

>>81813 Sure, you can enjoy the benefits of the ever improving AI. Sure, you can go "That'll do". It's easier for smut anyway. As for me, I always liked the personal aspect of it. I like discussing stuff like that with living breathing human beings. Like you. I'd probably be more serviced by talking to an AI, but I'd never completely switch people like you for it. I talked to and met interesting people and even had live sessions within the community. It was a rare occasion and even if she wasn't a tall slender Elven princess with ridiculously ticklish size 10s whom I could generate by the dozens for smut thanks to AI, I'd have never got there if I was talking to chatbots instead of finding one of her stories and sending her a praising message. I don't even remember half of the smut I generated yesterday as an experiment. I do remember those sessions. It has always been a little bit more than consuming content to me. Don't get me wrong, if that's as far as you're concerned, you do you, I can easily understand why you're hopeful that you'll be able to make do with nothing but AI one day. As for me, surrounding myself with AI -while it's getting better for just a wank- it just feels kinda lonely. Even more so than having a fetish regularly does. Am I really going to start praising people over writing a prompt? What will happen to our beloved hate/cringe threads? Where will be the drama when mediocrity becomes the new low? And the new peak as well? What will we discuss? Are we supposed to stop chatting with each other only because AI writes a better smut and won't be much to discuss or many to discuss with anyway? I may be an old man yelling at clouds, but I really hope that the community will be able to protect itself from the effects that take the human element out of something like tickling. Without that, I see a very lonely, very sad future for the people who are supposed to be the tickling community. I don't want to say one day that I liked talking to and meeting people before AI made dead internet more than just a conspiracy theory.

>>81828 As far as roleplay is concerned, I do think that on average AI is wayyy better than humans are. A lot of the people in the community are 1 line andy's who barely put in any effort. There are exceptions of course, but I found them a lot more rare than the 1 liners. The community will still be a thing, and I doubt every artist will just quit on the spot for it. We can still hate on artists like Moekeki who is putting his shitty AI stuff behind a paywall now. We can see wtfeather go from same image handdrawn to same image AI generated. I do think you are old man yelling at clouds to since I doubt it's going to be as bad as you think, because people will seek others who are interested in it. I also doubt that AI can't just exist alongside the normal artists and people. I like that there is the option for both. Wanna put in no effort or something instant? use AI want something more personal? hit up an artist or make a rp request in a discord server.

>>81833 >trying to find RP partners on fucking discord of all places Well there's your problem. Discord is just barely better than deviantart in terms of overall literacy. Go lurk on f-list or something if you really want to find a serious roleplay partner. But yeah, for what it's worth, AI does tend to be pretty good in terms of playing out various scenarios like that.

>>81833 I feel like this is just a small facet of a far greater problem People are spurning human interaction and aspects of the human experience in favor of machines that will just tell them what they want to hear and show them what they want to see

>>81836 Agreed, and part of the problem is real connections take work and energy. You have to put yourself out there risking rejection, failed relationships, and worse yet, outright hate. The payoff is far greater, but it's much easier to settle for a shadow of the human experience.

>>81836 >>81837 Why you guys so negative? Pixels are Pixels no matter where they came from. Also Would you guys prefer to live in a fake but perfect world or in a imperfect but real world? I prefer the fake one.

Does anyone have good prompts for feetgen? I dunno where to start and don't wanna pay for credits

>>81839 A world that is fake will never be "perfect", and you are fooling yourself if you think settling for a shadow merely imitating the real thing will lead you to a fulfilling existence.

>>81843 If something imitating the real thing is exactly like the real thing, then is there even any difference, and what are the implications of that? That's a known paradox anon. A known one we all know the answer to. If you feel like its' the same thing, then it will never matter.

>>81844 yes anon, we may very well be brains in jars but how many jars deep do you wanna go?

>>81844 Men who do nothing but dream, should just stay in their dreams forever!

You lot sure like to overthink things.

>>81836 Exactly, why would I put in effort for something I might not enjoy when AI can give me a quick nut? The real people are still there for when I do desire it, but that can't satisfy my needs in that exact moment. There can be balance, it's not one or the other.

>>81849 THIS All this mumbo jumbo about what is fake and what has the touch of humanity or not when it's just LITERALLY THIS >>81845 Let me tell you a secret, anon. Both the predicament in question and the "brain in jars" one, only make a difference if you think about them.

idk man, i can fap to this

>>81868 I mean I could too, but tbh the longer you look at these the more empty they feel. I'd rather fap to something made by an artist that has passion you can feel through their work. I don't have all the time in the world to consume porn, so when I do I want it to be good. Satisfying.

>>81890 Nta but you can only say that if you're aware that the drawing you're looking at is Ai or not. Right now I can agree that it's not good enough because even if it looks good, all it takes is for you to spot one mistake, a weird finger, weird background, weird lighting, etc. Whatever gives it away that it's Ai generated for you go quickly lose interest in the image and go look for something else. That's just for now though, give it a year or two more and we'll be no different from those Twitter people that get into argument with artists because nobody can tell if an art piece is using AI or not.

if you're not a footfag, ai is pretty much already there on the tickling, and if you are, it's getting there. you guys just need to actually follow the ai tickling people with custom models they train themselves and start looking into that instead of hoping bing will let you make the pictures or some shit.

>>81921 who is the artist for the fourth?

>>81926 It's this guy right here.

>>81921 This still has that shitty plastic feel inherent to AI porn. Feels like it was made in an assembly line. There's no style to it, no love. Why tf would anyone ever fap to something made by a machine when you have real Humans sharing your kinks and putting out good stuff? I won't ever understand what's so appealing about this crap. It's gray slop. It can technically sate the hunger (I guess) but you could go for a nice steak with a glass of wine and have a way better time instead.

>>81934 I kind of understand your point, and agree actually. So while I support AI porn, I definitely agree with you. I would have a way better time fapping to an artist's work, at least with the current state of AI. I think the whole point is that the person fapping feels in the freedom of coming up with their own images quickly, images that follow their exact instructions, whereas if you're not an artist all you could do is hope someone made what you wanted or pay a lot for a commission. Don't get me wrong, I would way better prefer a steak with a glass of wine. But This is much cheaper and faster, and at some point in the future it might even have the same taste.

More...

>>81768 Actually it is the first one for me. I'm not gatekeeping or shitting on AI smut, but it's hotter when the scenario I'm jacking it to is something a real person came up with

Just wanted to mention since nobody has - Flux is making decent tickling images, at least for my taste :)

>>82046 >Just wanted to mention since nobody has - Flux is making decent tickling images, at least for my taste :) Care to share your prompts? :)

Did Feetgen stop giving free 50 coins for new accounts? I wanted to try it out, and it's asking to purchase coins.

bump, because yeah... AI is getting so good, videos are almost impossible to tell apart from real life, and tickling images are STILL only HALF decent? what gives? has something good come up and I just happened to not be told?

This thread is evil

Are you Willowsbuggy ?

Really liking infiniteworlds for ai generated stories. Give it a try!

I’ve been considering a subscription to NAI to gen some tickling art, but I also hear tensor is a decent option. Which is the better option?