>>83450 >B-B-BASED No ones scared of you pansies, you wanted a civil war and are too much of a bitch to start one but still want to act out while throwing a temper tantrum Keep being contrarian because you have no personality and arent interesting in anyway whatsoever

>>83450 >living like asmongold simultaneously Isn't Asmon actually rather "redpilled"? Like PDP and JonTron before him. >>83483 >you wanted a civil war Quick question, who are the groups killing innocent people in mass shootings, and calling for the assassinations of people who just want to talk (Like we're seeing right now in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk)? I won't deny that there are people on the Woke Right who are hoping for a civil war, but they're not the ones actually causing the increasing likelihood of it happening. If you want to know who's doing that...well, then blame the group who's spent the past decade calling everything "-ist" and "-phobic" and "white supremacy" and labeling everyone they dislike as Nazis to the point that the label has no meaning (And by extension, people seeing zero issue to begin calling themselves a Nazi). <But that wasn't us Okay, which person was THE FUCKING AMISH COMMUNITIES voting for in the last election? Do you know what lengths you have to go to in order to upset Amish people? That's a genuine question, because who ever actually thought they would be a significant demographic to consider for a national election.

>>83489 Who are the people that commit the most domestic terror acts in this country?

>>83489 >who are the groups killing innocent people in mass shootings Please tell me who those groups are too

>>83489 >I became a Nazi because you called me a mean word! One of the most predictable and classic cases of a human, is blaming everyone else but yourself, your upbringing, or the fact that you were manipulated in any way and that is why you are the way you are As well, as you want to control what others say, or how they treat you because it hurts your feelings. Its complete mental weakness. Makes sense coming from someone who is manipulated by a far-right agenda

>>83493 >>83494 >Hes going to say the left or trans

>>83493 >>83494 >>83497 Technically, it is the FBI: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=SGG97dDfZ7E >>83496 What do you think is going to happen when you constantly harass, slander, and destroy someone's life for something as insignificant as a slightly politically offensive tweet? <Or drawing a character "incorrectly". >as you want to control what others say And congratulations on being a perfect example of DARVO in action. Because it's always "the Right" who wants to censor people like... <The past decade when social media companies, who were heavily tied to the Political Left and the Democratic Party, censored anyone who expressed an "extreme opinion", including the president of the United States after he told people to knock it off and go home <That time in the Aughts when Hillary Clinton led a massive campaign to censor video games sold in California, with the backing of The Governator, and her being imortalized for her work in GTA4 <That time in the 90's when Democratic senators tried to censor video games <That time in the 80's when Tipper Gore, wife to later 2000 Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore, led a campaign in an attempt to censor music <That time in the '54 when a bi-partison senate committee consisting of two Republicans and two Democrats called for the censorship of comics <That time in the 1915 when a Republican majority SCOTUS declared unanimously, including the two Democratic members, that films are not protected by Free Speech Yes, it is very clear who the people are that want to control other people's ability to speak. On that note, let us all take a moment of silence to honor Charlie Kirk, a Far-Left political activists who "only wanted to talk" and was killed for it be a Far-Right extremists who was living with a tranny. When will the Right realize the errors of their ways and end this attack on Free Speech?!

wtf is the schizoposting shit.

>>83502 The FBI goes into malls/stores and shoots people based off race as well as kills school children? >Thinking anything on tumblr or anything from twenty+ years ago is relevant at all/today So the right wanting to cancel pokemon and harry potter is irrevelevant now Cancelling Kaepernick for kneeling Cancelling any republican who critiques Trump Cancelling out boos at sports events where Trump is at Cancelling shows/news networks that criticize the right Cancelling porn Cancelling people from making jokes over Kirks death (not even the libs did this with the Hortmans) Cancelling musicians for critique or joking about Trump Cancelling feds that didnt tow the line for trump Cancelling experts on vaccines due to feelings Cancelling science in general because it doesnt fit your "beliefs Cancelling other religions other than christianity Cancelling "woke" and "dei" May I go on? Those are real things, not some tumblr garbage.

>>83506 >The FBI goes into malls/stores and shoots people based off race as well as kills school children? Oh, you mean something like the shooter in Evergreen, where we don't know anything except that he was "radicalized": https://archive.ph/GxbH6 Or previous shootin in Minneapolis, where the shooter had "kill Donald Trump" etched on the gun: https://archive.ph/Za3DZ Or the shooter before that at the Oxford Valley Mall, where we don't know anything except: https://archive.ph/Pj8cF <The suspect is described as a thin Black male younger than 30, with dreadlocks and a distinct gait. Or the shooting before that at the NFL headquarters that was apprently over football injuries: https://archive.ph/P2iFU What exactly are you trying to say? >Thinking anything on tumblr or anything from twenty+ years ago is relevant at all/today It does set a president. >So the right wanting to cancel pokemon and harry potter is irrevelevant now Did they actually attempt to cancel it, like you see with Senators Lieberman and Clinton leading massive political campaigns to prevent the releases of Mortal Kombat and Manhunt 2, or was it just a bunch of nuts making noise and which no one paid attention to? >Cancelling porn Hold the fuck up on that one!!! Which groups ridicules people for getting angry over risque content in Japanese games receiving censored in their Western releases? Because yes, companies like Sony and Nintendo are TOTALLY run by Republican nutjobs. The rest of your points are "tit for tat" back and forths that go nowhere, for example... >Cancelling people from making jokes over Kirks death Are the people on the "Political Left" infamously the one's who started declaring that "Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences"? Like you see famously in fourth pic? >Cancelling experts on vaccines due to feelings What happened to "My body, my choice"? >Cancelling science in general because it doesnt fit your "beliefs You mean like that the medical establishment has been doing for the past 50 years when it comes to people's health and nutrition: https://redirect.invidious.io/watch?v=vvIfIRMuVks >Cancelling other religions other than christianity >Cancelling "woke" and "dei" Yes because we practice an "insane" concept in this country called "religious tolerance". I understand the fact that your religious beliefs find the presence of other religions than your own to be an intolerable act where you're from, but we don't care. We're going to defend Christianity because people have the freedom to practice it here. You can practice your religion to, which we will defend, so long as you're not trying to impose it upon others like you are currently doing with religious activism known as DEI. To put it simply, all your doing is trying to list stuff as "proof" where none exists.

>>83509 Denying reality is why no one cares about you anymore Please, keep crazy posting as you try and excuse every single thing the right does while claiming anyone else is doing the same Cringe as fuck

Deport violent Niggers with the illegals

>>83509 Ugh this is all so cringe >Oh, you mean something like the shooter in Evergreen, where we don't know anything except that he was "radicalized": https://archive.ph/GxbH6 Or previous shootin in Minneapolis, where the shooter had "kill Donald Trump" etched on the gun: https://archive.ph/Za3DZ Or the shooter before that at the Oxford Valley Mall, where we don't know anything except: https://archive.ph/Pj8cF assumptions, never looked into the interviews with the police >Which groups ridicules people for getting angry over risque content in Japanese games receiving censored in their Western releases? Is there a fucking law saying to do this like in Texas? Jeeeeeesus >What happened to "My body, my choice"? Spreading your plague to others isnt your body my choice, but also itll just lead to more death including those of the anti-vaxxers I just feel bad for any kids they have >You mean like that the medical establishment has been doing for the past 50 years when it comes to people's health and nutrition Science cant be cancelled no matter what, the "medical establishment" is the same as saying "the deep state" >We're going to defend Christianity because people have the freedom to practice it here. You can practice your religion to, which we will defend, so long as you're not trying to impose it upon others Just like you are doing with christianity You have the right to practice any religion, in America one is not greater than the other Jesus fucking christ no matter what I show you, or say youll just try to redirect to some retarded bullshit that has no laws, no basis in reality, or is just feelings Annoying little knat

Go tell Arcta to get a personality or just draw some art, this shit is gay as fuck

I like how you brought up the videogames being censored because yes that is literally the choice of the company making the game I guess adult games or even sexy games dont exist in America? Bayonetta, neir, stellar blade were just all censored too Fucking hell its like you read an article from some 8chan board, and believe its true as they give you a few examples but completely ignore games that arent censored Like focusing on black violence but completely ignoring white violence Just fuckin stupid, actually you cant think shit

>>83520 >Denying reality What does that even "mean" anymore in the Post-Modernist landcape we live in, where one of the constant arguments being pushed is that reality and truth is subjective? >>83522 >assumptions, never looked into the interviews with the police Those news reports ARE based upon what's reported by the police. >Is there a fucking law saying to do this like in Texas? Texas and five other states, including California, which could mean a couple other things. Like for example, censorship only "matters" and people "care" about it when it comes from the "Right" but not whenever the "Left" participates in pushing censorship. >Spreading your plague to others isnt your body my choice, but also itll just lead to more death Oh, so I see how it is. The immigrants coming in from third-world countries, with piss-poor hygene practices, can have whatever ailments they want because it's "racist" to prevent them from entering a country and potentially releasing a plague. But how dare a "white person" do the same exact thing. >including those of the anti-vaxxers Why do you care? If your claims are correct, all that's going to happen is that the anti-vaxxers will all die out because of the simple process of "natural selection", leaving only the vaccinated to survive. You won. So what are you trying to argue? >Science cant be cancelled no matter what Yes, it can. It happens all the time. Scientists are told that they either move in lock step to "The Science" or they will receive no funding for their projects and be excommunicated. >Just like you are doing with christianity And THERE'S the conspiracy theory. That because I refuse to practice DEI, that must mean that I'm "forcing" my Christian values upon you. Because "how dare" someone refuse to do what you say. Whatever happened to "questioning authority"? >>83524 >that is literally the choice of the company making the game Oh, so because a company is told that they have to censor a game if they want to release it on a platform, then it isn't "real censorship" because the company "chose" to censor it? Or does it "not count" as "censorship" because the censorship is being demanded by a company as opposed to the government? >Bayonetta, neir, stellar blade were just all censored too They unironically are, though. Bayonetta was censored for her appearance in Smash Bros., Nier Replicant reduced the size of Kaine's breasts and ENTIRELY removed her dong (She's a canon futa), and Stellar Blade received a day-one censorship patch that removed costumes, gore effects, and in-game graffitti. >Like focusing on black violence Except, I wasn't. I was just looking up "recent shootings", and it just so happens that two of the four "most recent" mass shootings were committed by niggers. It's like declaring that I must "love" Mexican food because two of the last four meals that I had was a quesadilla.

>>83527 >Based upon BASED ON A TRUE STORY right? >Entire thread is whataboutism again The fact that you cant refute my points and just go WHAT ABOUT WHAT ABOUT WHAT ABOUT shows you arent a serious person to have a dialouge with >The neo-nazis were FBI!! >Tublr is the government! >Japan and America are the same and japanese companies are lead by americans! This is some of the most crazy nonsense I think ive read in a long time, people were right its scizoposting Funny how you had to go THE FBI when people called you out for wanting to call out the left for commiting domestic terror and shootings (they dont commit the most, and you know that but how dare you critique the right, right?) All your views are just LEFT BAD but when I turn it around on you, you go WHAT ABOUT WHAT ABOUT like a child You arent serious and, knowing people like you I just want to say this before you have the chance to. Looks like I "WON" this online debate

Weird how you focus on race too while crying about racism, almost every WHAT ABOUT point is about race for you And yes game companies censor themselves, it is up to them Platinum is not Nintendo. Mai also wasnt in Smash Bros and that was either Sakurais or Nintendos decision since smash is for "good boys and girls" They also made Tifa look different like Kaine but it doesnt take away from their character or how big their tits actually are. Kaine is still a hermaphrodite in the remake, but everyone got different models. Her tits arent much smaller, she is still wearing the same clothing. Weird how when talking about cencorship, its all sexual to you as well. Its like you completely fit a certain type of person. One thats termanilly online, porn addicted, probably a virgin, and scared of anyone and anything that isnt white. My guess is you might be gay, or trans and have some self-hate, that happens all the time with people that are very focused on sex. Stellar Blade, the devs are not Sony once again. Some skins were altered, out of the 70 in the game and from what it seems like, due to how awful it and unrealistic it made the models look. Even then looks like Sony was in charge of that. Now lets talk about games that havent been censored in America Vivian being trans in TTYD remake RE7, more censored in Japan Callisto Protocol banned in Japan in general Baluders Gate 3, japan removed a torture scene with sexual undertones Looks like theres censorship everywhere, for any amount of reasons but the ones that you focus on, the sexual ones always get censored due to a country or cultures "purity". If you want to get mad at censorship you should look to the people who deem themselves "pure" and if you know anything about America it isnt the gays, it isnt the left at all. The left are the people trying to stop this from happening. The problem are people like you that focus on the nothing-burgers that literally no base cares about except the pent-up virgins. You're crying about sexual censorship, without acknowledging that the reason why this happens is because of purity tests Sony and Nintendo make those decisions usually based off the purity testing going on in America as well as ersb ratings which has been going on for a long time and is still continuing to this day I know youre going to call them a feminist group, by the group in Australia Collective Shout are, once again religious TERFs that call for censorship of anything they deem "sexual" or "not pure" I feel like im reading /v/ from 10 years ago again, when very minor censorship was talked about but actual games being banned? Fine with that if its "woke" like what the fuck

And no, reality is still reality The whole "reality is subjective" bs comes from people like you that gaslight, and try to blur the lines or reality in order to fit an unrealistic narrative The sun exists Vaccines worked Food is something you need to eat And people will always lie for any reason

Anyway im done listening to the whole WHAT ABOUT when ive been giving context, and actual examples of things while you pull shit outta your ass and try to pass it off like its anything notable Ill probably see your WHAT ABOUT next post but this has been annoying and exhausting. Especially when im talking to a person who gets their feelings hurt over being called "-ists" when every point you make, you make about race when it doesnt even apply. Talking to you I thought might be good because you clearly have the energy, but the more I speak to you the more I realize youre some 4chan, probably virgin, that has all the same views as people like them and many of those views are either complete nothing-burgers or blaming others for problems where race or anything else isnt even a factor. You should know that, seeing how you spend a lot of your time debating, that no, race isnt a factor when it comes to crime. Theres so many other factors that have been historically shown to lessen crime, which is why crime is the lowest its ever been in America even with the existence of black people and hispanics. This has been a little eye-opening, that once again people like you always go WHAT ABOUT when I refute your points. Its terrible debate tactic, and usually the ones that sea-lion or go to whataboutisms are people that know they arent speaking the truth. If you were speaking the truth, you wouldnt have to do any of this, instead you WHAT ABOUT everything, and throw your feelings in there when none of that is based in reality in any capacity

Joe Mama! Strike down these retarded niggers in this thread and my life is yours!

>>83527 Why not post the news reports? What laws are being passed? Just racism and accusations You spread diseases to other people which leads to them being hurt/killed What is "The science?" Science doesnt care about your views You are the one who is telling others that your religion is superior. You are the authority that others are questioning. Censorship happens for many reasons. The other anon said you're focused on the sexual aspect as opposed to every way a game can be censored. It is up to the company, usually going along with the culture of that country. Other anon already explained. School shooter on the day of Kirks passing as well as the guy who shot Kirk was white. What you posted is a lie.

I originally had a long post that explained things in minute detail, but the site just axed it before I could post it. So don't make any new responses until this evening because I already wasted enough time this morning on a post no one is going to see.

Thread should be nuked tbh. No one is posting art, it is just shit flinging. But It is nice to see Artca or his community acting like this though

If you’ll allow me, I’m going to try something different for an argument. Rather than directly refute talking points, as is provides nothing except a constant back and forth with no end, I am instead going to present my views on matters and where I stand. Addressing the points from the most repeated to the least. And in case you guys haven't figured it out, I'm not Artca. I'm a guy who's been native to this site since Day fucking One, when it went online back in 2020. >You're engaging in whataboutisms >You're sealioning I do not see a point in arguing with a person who presents such refutations whenever a point is presented. In my experience, and every single time I’ve seen the card played, it affirmatively declares that anyone who ever has anything to say is arguing from a place of deceit and lies. It creates an environment where a discussion, and any attempt at learning is incapable of taking place because there’s only “two sides” from that point forward, “your side” and the “lair’s side”. And I think that’s exactly why such Thought Terminating Cliches are often thrown out in today’s environment. Because it does shut down all discussion. No one can ever have a nuanced or moderate opinion on a topic because the cliché assumes that “everyone” must by lying. That is it “never” possible for a person to just be uninformed on a subject or mistakenly seeing parallels on a topic where none exists. It also presents the trick that a person never has to actually declare their thoughts and opinions on a subject. Which is also the exactly the point. Some people are so ashamed or embarrassed about their own beliefs, that they can never admit them to anyone else. So the moment someone finally asks for them to present a take on a subject, all they have to declare is that the person is “sealioning”. However such a tactic does nothing except show the weakness in one’s own argument. In the case of “sealioning”, it would only ever be a valid fallacy to throw out there in a world telepathy exists because nothing would ever be a secret and people would be an open book. At least, hypothetically. You wouldn’t have to ask for someone to voice their views because you “would” already know them. Then with the case of “whataboutisms”, it’s just an excuse to declare that things are “so complex” that it’s “impossible” for two seemingly similar situations to compare and therefore a waste of time to discuss such topics. But I see there also being another layer to this argument. It presents and reaffirms the idea that “truth” is a subjective concept. That it’s impossible for anything to be at all similar because there’s a near-infinite universe out there. But if one actually studies various subjects across various domains, the world is much more similar then people tend to realize. Let’s take the example of the Asian game of Igo. It’s a game played on a 19x19 board where players place black and white stones for the purposes of one player gaining more territory than the other. There is more complexity to how you can achieve this but that is the main principle. So when a player is placing the stones on the board, the guiding principle in their decision boils down to: <What action can I take that would further my ability to gain territory Pretty simple concept, right? Now let’s consider something like...the subject of one’s fitness goals. You would not think such a principle carries over because one is a board game and the other is a lifestyle. But consider all you have to do to become healthy. You just begin asking yourself: <What action can I take that would further my ability to lose weight/gain muscle/increase my metabolism/etc. And you can do this with almost anything. <What action can I take that would further my ability to increase the size of my purse Now I am NOT trying to say that becoming a fitness guru or a multi-billionaire is going to make you a “Go master”. You still have to learn the different rules and tactics of whatever game you play. But what I AM saying is that the principles that set you down the path to become whatever person you want to be is what’s universal. If you want to see more examples of these “universal truths”, people like Dale Carnegie have written entire books showing the similarities in the principles and actions people taken to succeed in life and human relations, and showing how they “work” regardless of the person, cultural age, and even the geography. And that’s ultimately what declaring something to be a “whataboutism” seeks to deny. It’s an appeal to the complex and the denial that people are intelligent enough to see similarities. Now, of course, we have to address the “elephant” in the room. The possibility that someone is a genuine “bad actor”. And sometimes that is the case. However it is such a rarity for someone to intentionally be making arguments in bad faith that going into a discussion assuming this to always be the case is just asking for trouble. Like I said earlier, you’re assuming that the other is lying and being deceitful. And as a result of that mindset, you’re going to see everything said as being a lie or a misconception no matter what points or topics are said. It’s a self-fulfilling prophecy. But if this is the case, then how do you honestly tell when a person is not being genuine? Short answer, you don’t. All you can do is go in assuming people are of the best of intentions, and see what happens. They’ll more often then not surprise you. The only exception I can probably see being acceptable is if there’s a (personal) history with person as they have repeatedly shown and proven to be distrustful. However at the same time, what brought on that distrust that you now hold? Was is it the person actually being dishonest, or is it an expectation that the person was dishonest and that painted that view of them from that point forward? >You see Christianity as being superior >You oppose Leftism Based on everything else that I have seen regarding other religions, I do believe Christianity is the best belief system that exists. And as I am a person who has this view, I will tell others about it for the purposes of spreading the message. Such a thought makes people angry. I don’t exactly know why, but I can provide my theories. The first has to do with a bad experience. Nothing much I can do there other than find out what happened and hopefully correct whatever wrong occurred. The second reason has to do with the fact that is just so massive and you get tired of constantly hearing about it. That I can relate to on some level. A lot of people do not to know when to just shut the Hell up. I get the idea that you want to spread the word of God, but you don’t have to keep trying to stuff it into every moment of every day. There is a time for worship and study but this is not it. But then again, such a complaint would be equivalent to going to an Asian country and complaining about how everything is surrounded around Buddhism. The third has to do with the fact that you fundamentally disagree with it. Okay, I can see a discussion taking place in this regard. What is there to disagree about regarding Christianity? Out of all the reasons out there, I believe they all boil down to one simple fact, you are a person who’s practicing a different faith. And depending on what that faith is, there’s nothing wrong with that. You could think Christianity is wrong and Zoroastrianism the way, and you have every right to believe that. However where things do go wrong is when you’re religious belief concludes that nothing else can ever exist except for your belief system. Islam tends to be one that’s most associated with this concept, but there’s also the religion of Leftism (Or, more specifically, Hermetic-Gnosticism). From what I have come to understand, unlike Christianity and most other religions for that matter, Leftism is a very anti-theistic religion. Do not mistake this for Atheism, which is the outright denial of any pantheon or esotericism. Instead, Leftism lives on the idea that humanity is God, that we are already perfect but essentially “asleep at the wheel”. And that is it the job of “awakened man” to fix this imperfect reality by awakening everyone else. How this is done is through concepts like “equity” (The “E” in DEI), where we must artificially change the outcomes (Which will require everyone to participate in order to succeed), to fix the “original sin” of reality, in order to change reality to where it is “equal” and “perfect”. And as a Christian, I will not deny that I cannot be anything except outright opposed to such an ideal. Christianity does agree on the concept that the world is imperfect, but how to treat such an issue is handled entirely differently. It is believe that we have dominion over the world (Genesis 2:15 and 3:23), but we are never in charge of nor can control the world (Which was the entire point of Job). The cause for our imperfect world is that we turned out backs on God (Eating the fruit), and so we are cursed as a result of that action. But there is an “escape” from this Hell and that is follow Christ and his teachings, and this “escape” only requires that you (And you alone) believe. And that’s where the philosophical differences get heavy. Leftism requires everyone’s participation to achieve paradise, Christianity does not. Therefore Leftism cannot coexist with Christianity. And this makes followers of Leftism angry, because, as a result of my refusal to participate, I’m dooming them to this “Imperfect Hell”. This can also be construed as my “imposing” my religious values upon theirs because their religion demands everyone’s participation while mine does not.

>>83660 >Censorship I am firmly against censorship in all it’s forms. I do not ever see it as being justifiable and always abhorrent in practice, regardless if the censorship comes down from the government or a corporation. I see is as the immature belief that people are “too stupid” to think for themselves on what they can handle so someone else has to step in and “think” for them. This applies whether the censorship be in regards to sexual content or grotesque images or even ideas. Even the appeal to “cultural differences” isn’t an excuse because it’s still an appeal based upon the idea that people are “too stupid” to possibly experience cultures that exist outside of their little corner of the world with a reasonable mind. But that isn’t the only reason for censorship, it also exists for the purposes of control. To a lot of people, they do not see the difference between what is “legal” and what is “moral”, often conflating the two on the basis that law sprouts from moral views and vice versa. And as a result of this mindset, they believe that making something “illegal” will result in society no longer having these “bad thoughts” about whatever the thing is that is now a criminal act. I fundamentally disagree about this being the case. Laws exist for one reason, and “reason” is that they are “club rules” you are required to follow if you wish to participate in society. That is it. Morality is a whole other subject. But I cannot deny that these people are correct to an extent. If it was illegal for me to...say, talk about my religious views in public, I would think twice about every next word that comes out of my mouth. Not because I don’t firmly believe in my religion, but because I face a choice that effects my life. The choice of either being able to continue participating in society, or having my life destroyed. And that’s exactly the environment censorship breeds, regardless of whoever is enforcing it (Right or Left, company or politician). The creators faces the problem that they can either make the work they truly desire and be ruined for it, or make whatever the bipolar moral busybody deems as acceptable for today. So if these are my views on the topic, why do people “like me” only ever tend to talk about censorship from a singular perspective? The answer is simply because of where I live, how I live my life, and what has historically happened. Since I am an American living in America, I tend to focus on censorship from the perspective of an American, and recent American history has displayed that the Political Left have been the most prevalent in pushing censorship for the past half century. From music in the 80’s to video games in the 90’s and Aughts to social media in the 2010’s and 2020’s. And as I am an American who likes Japanese video games and anime, what I tend to focus on in regards to censorship discussions is the removal of sexual content because that is the type of content that is most often effected by regional censorship. Now with all that being said, it is not a declaration that other forms of censorship do not occur occur or that they’re unimportant. The Political Right censoring films in the 1910’s and comics the 1950’s is just as despicable as what the Political Left is currently doing. The fact that console games released in Japan have to censor grotesque images in addition to sexual content is just as maddening as the exclusive censorship of sexual content here in America. However the key difference is that this censorship does not effect me or there is nothing I can do about it. Films finally escaped the censorship imposed upon them in the 1950’s, and the Comics Code Authority hasn’t been relevant since the 60’s. Meanwhile with Japan, there is nothing that I can actually do about changing the state of affairs in a country that’s an ocean away and that I am not a citizen of. Granted, I can try to talk to Japanese people, but there’s nothing I can actually do beyond that. And even then, I don’t want to. The people of Japan have the right to control how their country evolves and progresses, and who am I demand otherwise. I can disagree with their decisions all I want, but that’s it. Or is it? As I pointed out earlier, PlayStation has effectively become an American company since 2016. And as other people have pointed out, Nintendo is becoming more influenced in company decisions by their American branch and Treehouse rather than their HQ in Kyoto. So since these are now “American” companies by proxy, being influenced by “Americans”, isn’t there something that I can do as an American? Yes, there is, and I’m already doing so. First off, I’m not supporting these companies in any way. The most recent PlayStation that I have is the Vita and the most recent Nintendo system that I own is the Wii U. In addition to that, I spread around information to other English-speaking people about what these companies are doing for the purposes of encouraging them to also drop any further support for these companies. And this is on top of attempting to inform people of censorship that happens in general. You guys brought up the subject of Texas’ new bill, but most are not aware that it’s not the ONLY bill of it’s kind. As Acid, this site’s owner, reported back in March: https://archive.ph/5YXkp#10103 <Beginning on January 1st, several countries and US States had laws go into effect concerning AI generated porn. Think like the law currently being debated in Texas, except there's already 12 States that passed it, and many, many countries. This snuck up on us, as it wasn't widely reported in any free-speech channels and we never saw much protest or other dust kicked up that would draw attention to it. Most of these laws are surface aimed at Deepfake images used for harassment purposes, but several, like the one in Texas, also pose a serious threat to the existence of *any and all* fictional content that so much as resembles a minor. The retardation that we saw years ago in Australia went International, and nobody was the wiser until it was already in effect all over. However that’s the last I ever heard regarding this discussion, and haven’t talked about it since as a result of that. No one ever seemed to look into all these other states and countries who imposed similar laws. They’re only focusing on Texas, especially after what happened to JAST a few weeks ago: https://archive.ph/u2URf However, despite this all being said, let’s engage in a little thought experiment. Let’s assume that Texas “was” the “only” place that had implemented such a law. Would I still be speaking up about it? Yes, I would, and have been ever since people found out about it. Would it suddenly, in my eyes, make me want to go out there and ridicule the everyone on the Right and dismiss everything having to do with them? No. I’m not going to dismiss an entire group because of a “few bad apples” (Asubject for a little later), and when this is their “first” actual attempt of such an act in comparison to the Political Left who have been pushing for such laws for the past four decades. Thought experiment over. And when compoundes with Texas not being the only state with such a bill, it exposes the fact that it doesn’t matter whether it’s the Political Left or the Political Right who is attempting to censor people. Both are trying to do it. Stop playing politics like it’s a team sport and throw these people out regardless. >The Science Science is one thing and one thing only. You have a theory about a subject, you create an experiment to test said theory, and the experiment either proves your theory to be valid or flawed. Nothing more as that’s been the scientific method for over a millennia. The funny thing about science is that it’s a field anyone can participate in. Regardless if you’re a child or someone with 10 PHDs, science operates on the understanding that everyone should be capable of repeating the same experiments and receiving the same results. However that isn’t what science actually “means” anymore, and really hasn’t for the past few centuries. Every since the “Enlightenment”, “Science” has become a term used as a means to establish legitimacy. That you’re no longer analyzing politics, you’re studying “Political science”. You’re not a historian, you’re studying “the science of history”. And this has culminated in the environment that we have today, where science isn’t about science anymore. It’s about people pushing their political views, and calling it a “science”. Man must give up all his necessities and live like an animal. Why? Because “science” says so. We need to give all our money to poor people in order to end poverty. Why? Because “science” says so. Why do I need to give up porn? Because “science”. All anyone ever hears today is “science”, and they believe anything that follows. “Science” could declare that the sky is yellow and the grass indigo, and people will go right along with it when they can clearly see with their own two eyes that it’s blue and green. And this is the situation that we’ve seen with everything from climate studies to Corona-chan. Since the 70’s, “the science” has declared that “green house gasses” is the reason for bad weather despite every single study performed all the way up to the 60’s declaring that weather patterns were more closely tied to solar flares and generational cycles. In 2020, we’re suddenly suppose to treat a coronavirus, which is one of the leading causes for the “common colds” in adults and we have been dealing with since the dawn of time, as a deadly disease that will kill everyone unless you take an experimental vaccination method that has never been tried before. I cannot speak for everyone, but no one believes “science” anymore because of people twisting it so much to suite their goals.

>>83661 >Racism Has anyone ever stopped and asked what “racism” actually is? I man genuine actually “racism”. Because it seems to be a thrown around term today to the point that it’s become meaningless. X happened because of “racism”, or you’re only noticing things because “racism”, or something of the sort. As far as what I define “racism” as, well it’s simple as the dictionary explains it as: <a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race (C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights reserved Okay, but what’s actually wrong with that? The latter half of that definition is true. A perfect example of this is the Japanese. Because of their constant exposure to seafood and sea cultivation, they’ve developed a racial trait where their bodies releases a special enzymes that allows for them to be better capable of consuming foods like seaweed than other races of people. What’s wrong with acknowledging that certain people are better at other things than others, and that the reverse also happens to be true? Like the memes about how Asians act like they’re on life support if they come down with a cold. But then again, from what I understand, a lot of people don’t tend to look at racism “that way”. Instead they focus upon the other definition: <racial prejudice or discrimination (C)1996 Zane Publishing, Inc. and Merriam-Webster, Incorporated. All rights reserved Okay, simple enough. I can agree that we should not look at people as a whole “group”, and judge them for that, because people are not some unified “whole”. We are all individual persons, and as such we should all look and treat people as an individual. However that being said, we cannot stop people from noticing certain patterns. If you constantly meet a series of people who look and act the same way, people are going to begin associating people who look that way as “always” acting that way. And while some like to ridicule this activity as being “bigoted”, they forget humanity developed certain survival techniques. Man has spent the past 6000+ years of recorded history trying to live on a planet where everything is designed to kill us. One of the methods that we have used to survive this long is something called “pattern recognition”, in that we see patterns in all things. Sometimes those patterns are proven to be wrong, but it doesn’t matter so long as you’re still living and breathing. And that’s what ends up happening. Even if we don’t intended to do it and want to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. So what can be done about it? Nothing except to act like a model representative. No matter how intelligent or reasonable people are, people cannot stop themselves from instinctively judging you based on how you look and act. So with that in mind, why not live like the kind of person you want people to treat you as? >Where is your source? If you haven't noticed, I tend to provide links using archives and third part services like Invidious. The reason I do this is for the purposes of preservation and adblocking. And because the links are much shorter. >You must be a virgin >You must be gay >You must be trans Does no else see the irony that insults never really change? I mean consider that today’s world is suppose to be more “progressive” than past ones. You can express yourself as being a homosexual, transexual, or even asexual. Yet for some reason, people keep hypocritically sticking to the “classics” for insults. Why is that? Is it really that bad of an existence being a virgin? I mean, you don’t have any commitments, you don’t face a risk of catching an STD, and you don’t have “other thoughts” clouding up your time. Even on the occasion that you have a “mighty need”, you can fap one out in 10 minutes and continue with your life. Being a fag, I can see the issue. Sticking your dick up someone’s pooper isn’t sanitary, no matter how much you give it a power wash. But still not a bad existence. Unlike a woman who has zero idea what it’s like being a man, you have a bro who can sympathize with you 100%. In addition, there isn’t any chance of an “accident” popping out nine months down the line because you forgot to use the condom. And being a twink is perhaps the best outcome. Because instead of someone looking for some hags pussy, you can instead become the someone’s dream girl without all the baggage tied with actually being a girl. So what’s the actual issue? What’s with the meaningless insults? >You're crazy >You cannot be serious And you have nothing to contribute to the conversation, other than thinking that an expression of "shock" is going to leave some impression on people. But, let’s be honest. If your only contribution is expressing a reaction, then don’t even bother posting. It’s a waste of time, and not worth following up with a response. If you actually do want to continue this discussion, then do at least one of the following: <Quote a section where you think I may have misspoken about something or you think needs clarification Given such a long response, and trying to rush this out before I hit the sack, there’s the likely possibility that I missed something when posting this. I’d be happy to correct the matter or attempt add detail. <Explain where you disagree with something I said and explain what your beliefs are on a matter This is a discussion after all. All I’m doing is expressing my views, and I do not expect other people to believe the same things I do, or even come to the same conclusions that I did. The best thing would be for you to explain on how, where, and why you differ because then it creates an environment where we learn about different ideas and viewpoints.

For crying out loud, let this thread die please🙏

>>83665 Artca have figure out how to shut down piracy once and for all: shitting up the piracy with politics

>>83669 I think he just does it because he desperately craves any kind of attention, that, snd he spews stuff here because he’s too scared to actually visit “those other” parts of the World Wide Web.

>>83665 Yes, let's kill this super active thread because my opinions aren't being validated? Fuck off, faggot!

>>83711 No, Im not saying your opinions arent being validated. This thread was MEANT for the art of Artca. Not for constant fucking arguing

Artca9 is the kind of person who gets triggered when you point out that Charlie Kirk's death is frankly a relief for so many people that he hurt and spread misinformation about. Artca9 is the kind of person who sees the above paragraph and basically tries to tell you "ooh, ahh, be scared of the big bad internet man, the mean actual Nazis are coming". Artca9 is the kind of useful idiot that launders arguments for the worst people in the world with exactly zero self-awareness. But hey, Charlie Kirk dying is a net positive for the real world, and Nick Fuentes is a little bitch boy.

Heeeeyyyy, wait a tick, this isn’t /pol/!

Hey all im a moderate also fuck all blacks the holocaust didnt happen and if you hold your head underwater for 5 hours you wont die

>>83711 >“super active thread because my opinions aren't being validated” This is supposed to be a vore thread, on the vore section of the site, of which said part of the site revolves around vore, in a thread that is supposed to be about vore, on the vore section of the site, of which vore is the priority.