>>5746
My delusional mother was talking about how the globalists were working towards 'eugenics.' This extreme ignorance of THE most important scientific discovery of mankind is disgusting. eu= good, genics = genetics. Eugenics then literally means GOOD GENETICS. The present
(((elite))) in the West at best doesn't care about good genetics, and at worst, is actively working to promote BAD GENETICS or dysgenics (in reality this is obviously the case). Population reduction isn't necessarily eugenic, it depends on what the precise definition of eugenics is according to the group attempting to implement it, and upon what groups are facing population reduction. A population reduction could only be said to be eugenic if those with inferior genetics face greater population reduction than those with superior genetics nya~
I suppose a certain group, such as the Kikes might have a plan to select 'good' genetics for their goyim slaves. They might even call this 'eugenics.' In reality, according to the founders of the field, this would actually be dysgenics. True eugenics as emphasised by famous proponents such as the Third Reich supported the proliferation of beauty, strength, intelligence, and talent. Therefore any deviation from this goal could be said to be dygenic. Indeed, if you do not actively support eugenics, you are at least passively supporting dysgenics. There exists two main forms of eugenics, negative and positive. The most extreme form of negative eugenics is killing (or more moderately, exile). Sterilisation or limiting reproductive options is another less extreme form of negative eugenics nya~
Positive eugenics is far easier to support. Positive eugenics essentially states that the more (and especially the MOST) beautiful, strong, smart, and talented should have more children. For-example, under such a system, Nicola Tesla should have had more children than any other man on Earth in his time. Instead, he had none. This is a tragedy for humanity nya~